Literature DB >> 23103383

Diminished but not forgotten: effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits.

Patricia M Simone1, Matthew C Bell, Nicholas J Cepeda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Age-related changes in memory performance are common in paired associate episodic memory tasks, although the deficit can be ameliorated with distributed practice. Benefits of learning episode spacing in older adults have been shown in single-session studies with spaced presentations of items followed by a test. This study examined the magnitude of the spacing effect benefit in older adults relative to younger adults when given a multiday spacing effect paradigm.
METHOD: We examined the impact of spacing gap (~15min vs. 24hr) in younger (N = 51, Mage = 19 years, SD = 0.6) and older (N = 54, Mage = 65 years, SD = 8.8) adults with a 10-day retention interval.
RESULTS: Spacing of learning episodes benefited both younger and older adults. There was an age-related difference in the magnitude of this benefit that has not been observed in earlier studies. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that spacing benefited the long-term memory of older adults, however the effect was diminished and qualitatively different from that of younger adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Memory; Spacing effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23103383     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbs096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  9 in total

1.  Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Kalif E Vaughn; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05

2.  Auditory Training for Adults Who Have Hearing Loss: A Comparison of Spaced Versus Massed Practice Schedules.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Joe Barcroft; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Pattern and predictability in memory formation: from molecular mechanisms to clinical relevance.

Authors:  Gary T Philips; Ashley M Kopec; Thomas J Carew
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Between-list lag effects in recall depend on retention interval.

Authors:  Mary A Pyc; David A Balota; Kathleen B McDermott; Tim Tully; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

5.  Very similar spacing-effect patterns in very different learning/practice domains.

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Manfred Spitzer; Zrinka Sosic-Vasic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  When twice is better than once: increased liking of repeated items influences memory in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Rocco Palumbo; Alberto Di Domenico; Beth Fairfield; Nicola Mammarella
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2021-02-06

7.  Judging the credibility of websites: an effectiveness trial of the spacing effect in the elementary classroom.

Authors:  Vanessa Foot-Seymour; Melody Wiseheart
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-01-17

8.  The Effects of Distributed vs. Condensed Schedule for Robot-Assisted Training with Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Spastic Upper Limbs in Chronic Post-Stroke Subjects.

Authors:  Jen-Wen Hung; Yen-Wei Chen; Yi-Ju Chen; Ya-Ping Pong; Wen-Chi Wu; Ku-Chou Chang; Ching-Yi Wu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Spacing Repetitions Over Long Timescales: A Review and a Reconsolidation Explanation.

Authors:  Christopher D Smith; Damian Scarf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.