BACKGROUND: To investigate foot pressure distribution parameter-power ratio (PR) difference between pre-obese and non-obese adults subjects during standing and show the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and PR value. METHODS: We examined 22 healthy adult subjects aged from 20 to 45 years were classified into two groups according to their BMI values, as 11 non-obese and 11 pre-obese subjects. Foot pressure distribution image during standing was obtained using PedoPowerGraph system. Pedopowergraphic parameters such as percentage medial impulse, forefoot to hind foot pressure distribution ratio and PR were evaluated and compared between the groups. Correlation between BMI value and PR value was assessed. RESULTS: Our result shows significant change in contact area between the groups in mid foot regions. Also we found significant differences in mid foot PR values (p<0.05) between the groups, but no significant differences in hind foot and forefoot PR values. In addition BMI value was found to have positive correlation with right and left mid foot PR value (r=0.60 & 0.61) for all the subjects. CONCLUSION: This study provides for the first time new insights into foot pressure distribution difference in mid foot among pre-obese subjects as compared to non-obese adult subject while standing. Hence knowledge of high mid foot PR value among pre-obese subjects can provide suitable guidelines for designing orthotic devices.
BACKGROUND: To investigate foot pressure distribution parameter-power ratio (PR) difference between pre-obese and non-obese adults subjects during standing and show the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and PR value. METHODS: We examined 22 healthy adult subjects aged from 20 to 45 years were classified into two groups according to their BMI values, as 11 non-obese and 11 pre-obese subjects. Foot pressure distribution image during standing was obtained using PedoPowerGraph system. Pedopowergraphic parameters such as percentage medial impulse, forefoot to hind foot pressure distribution ratio and PR were evaluated and compared between the groups. Correlation between BMI value and PR value was assessed. RESULTS: Our result shows significant change in contact area between the groups in mid foot regions. Also we found significant differences in mid foot PR values (p<0.05) between the groups, but no significant differences in hind foot and forefoot PR values. In addition BMI value was found to have positive correlation with right and left mid foot PR value (r=0.60 & 0.61) for all the subjects. CONCLUSION: This study provides for the first time new insights into foot pressure distribution difference in mid foot among pre-obese subjects as compared to non-obese adult subject while standing. Hence knowledge of high mid foot PR value among pre-obese subjects can provide suitable guidelines for designing orthotic devices.