Literature DB >> 23102878

Utility of combination of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay in diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy.

Marek Šramko1, Miloš Kubánek, Jaroslav Tintěra, Dana Kautznerová, Jiří Weichet, Jana Malušková, Janka Franeková, Josef Kautzner.   

Abstract

We evaluated the clinical utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) combined with a novel high-sensitivity troponin T assay (hs-cTnT) in the diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy. CMR, measurement of hs-cTnT, and endomyocardial biopsy were performed in 42 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and a short-term history of heart failure (median 2 months, interquartile range 1 to 3.5). The patients were followed up for 25 ± 9 months for events. Endomyocardial biopsy revealed myocarditis in 15 subjects (36%). The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the individual CMR tissue parameters for myocardial inflammation was 40%, 96%, and 76% for early gadolinium enhancement, 87%, 44%, and 60% for late gadolinium enhancement, 47%, 89%, and 74% for pericardial effusion, and 67%, 85%, and 79% for any 2 of the criteria simultaneously, respectively. An assessment of myocardial edema on T(2)-weighted imaging and/or hs-cTnT assay were inadequate for the diagnosis. The extent of late gadolinium enhancement and increased hs-cTnT concentration were significant predictors of a composite end point of cardiac death, urgent heart transplantation, and hospitalization for worsening heart failure (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 1.2, per percentage of left ventricular mass; and hazard ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 3.5, per ln ng/L; p = 0.008 and p = 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, the results of the present study have demonstrated a modest performance for CMR and a limited use of the hs-cTnT assay in the diagnosis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Nonetheless, in these patients, CMR and/or hs-cTnT assessment seems to be useful for the prediction of the clinical outcome.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23102878     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Myocarditis in the differential diagnosis of cardiomyopathies. Endomyocardial biopsy or MRI?].

Authors:  C Besler; G Schuler; P Lurz
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Meta-analysis on the immunohistological detection of inflammatory cardiomyopathy in endomyocardial biopsies.

Authors:  Julius L Katzmann; Peter Schlattmann; Angelos G Rigopoulos; Ewa Noutsias; Boris Bigalke; Matthias Pauschinger; Carsten Tschope; Daniel Sedding; P Christian Schulze; Michel Noutsias
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Blissett; Yehuda Chocron; Bojan Kovacina; Jonathan Afilalo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Combined electrocardiography, coronary angiography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of viral myocarditis: A case report.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Shenghu He; Xiang Qi; Yimin Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Lights and shadows of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocarditis.

Authors:  Antonio Esposito; Marco Francone; Riccardo Faletti; Maurizio Centonze; Filippo Cademartiri; Iacopo Carbone; Roberto De Rosa; Ernesto Di Cesare; Ludovico La Grutta; Guido Ligabue; Luigi Lovato; Erica Maffei; Riccardo Marano; Massimo Midiri; Gianluca Pontone; Luigi Natale; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-11-10

Review 6.  Clinical applications of multi-parametric CMR in myocarditis and systemic inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Jakub Lagan; Matthias Schmitt; Christopher A Miller
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Performance of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Myocarditis Compared with Endomyocardial Biopsy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuheng Wei; Jing Fu; Liang Chen; Shujing Yu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-07-29

8.  Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance characteristics and dynamic changes in myocardial and skeletal muscles in idiopathic inflammatory cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yuanwei Xu; Jianhong Sun; Ke Wan; Liuyu Yu; Jie Wang; Weihao Li; Fuyuao Yang; Jiayu Sun; Wei Cheng; David Mui; Qing Zhang; Qibing Xie; Yucheng Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Increased C reactive protein, cardiac troponin I and GLS are associated with myocardial inflammation in patients with non-ischemic heart failure.

Authors:  K Keller; P Wenzel; S Schwuchow-Thonke; S Göbel; T Emrich; V H Schmitt; F Fueting; C Klank; F Escher; H P Schultheiss; T Münzel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Injury in COVID-19: Diagnosis, Risk Stratification and Prognosis.

Authors:  Saagar K Sanghvi; Logan S Schwarzman; Noreen T Nazir
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.