Literature DB >> 2310285

Evaluation of patient, physician, nurse, and family attitudes toward do not resuscitate orders.

C J Stolman1, J J Gregory, D Dunn, J L Levine.   

Abstract

We investigated attitudes toward resuscitation by interviewing 97 competent patients classified as do not resuscitate, 60 physicians, 80 family members, and 84 nurses. In addition, 58 family members of incompetent do not resuscitate patients were interviewed. Interview patients were generally elderly, female widows with a diagnosis of malignancy. The majority (66%) preferred that their medical decision making be shared with the physician and/or family. Only 38 patients (39%) could correctly define a "living will." After hearing the definition, 59 patients (61%) thought it was a good idea to ask noncritically ill patients at the time of hospital admission, if they had a living will. Fifty-six patients (58%) said they had discussed resuscitation with their physician, whereas 44 physicians (73%) said they had discussed it with the patient. Only 53 patients (55%) said that they thought their physician understood their wishes. Sixty-five patients (67%) wanted involvement in resuscitation decisions. Forty-eight patients (49%) offered "quality of life" reasons for not wanting to be resuscitated. Sixty-four patients (66%) did not think discussing resuscitation was cruel and insensitive. Eighteen physicians (30%) said they were uncomfortable discussing resuscitation with patients. We recommend introducing the topic of resuscitation early in the patient-physician relationship before diminished competency occurs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Overlook Hospital (Summit, NJ)

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2310285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  21 in total

1.  [Reflections on living wills (I and II)].

Authors:  K Martínez Urionabarrenetxea
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Do not resuscitate policies of New Jersey hospitals.

Authors:  C J Stolman; J J Gregory; D Dunn
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1991

3.  Seriously ill hospitalized patients' perspectives on the benefits and harms of two models of hospital CPR discussions.

Authors:  Wendy G Anderson; Jenica W Cimino; Bernard Lo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

4.  Ethical issues involving older people.

Authors:  J Liddle; I R Hastie
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Discussions of "code status" on a family practice teaching ward: what barriers do family physicians face?

Authors:  B Calam; S Far; R Andrew
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Improving the documentation and appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions.

Authors:  C L Hignett; D R Forsyth; G D Connor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Contributions of empirical research to medical ethics.

Authors:  R A Pearlman; S H Miles; R M Arnold
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1993-09

8.  End-of-life discussions: a need unfulfilled and a task undefined.

Authors:  M O Hodges
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Survey of "do not resuscitate" orders in a district general hospital.

Authors:  E J Aarons; N J Beeching
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-14

10.  The discussion of end-of-life medical care by primary care patients and physicians: a multicenter study using structured qualitative interviews. The EOL Study Group.

Authors:  M P Pfeifer; J E Sidorov; A C Smith; J F Boero; A T Evans; M B Settle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.