BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI) is considered a state of the art non-invasive modality for the detection of reversible ischemia. Recent studies have shown its utility in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and superiority over other established techniques. However, only a few studies compared CMR-MPI against the invasive standard including fractional flow reserve (FFR) and clinical validation in non-specialized centers is scarce. The aim of this study was to validate CMR-MPI in a real-world clinical environment and to test its diagnostic accuracy in symptomatic patients with suspected CAD versus FFR as the reference standard of functionally significant disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: 103 symptomatic consecutive patients (62 ± 8.0 years, 66% males) with suspected CAD and intermediate or high probability of disease underwent sequential CMR and invasive coronary angiography (XA). The CMR protocol included stress-rest adenosine perfusion, SSFP cine imaging and late-enhancement imaging. Functionally significant CAD was defined as occlusive/sub-occlusive stenoses on XA or non-occlusive stenoses with a FFR measurement of <0.80 in vessels >2mm. On a patient-based model, CMR-MPI had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 89%, 88%, 85%, and 91%, respectively, with a global accuracy of 88%. On a vessel-based analysis, these values were 80%, 93%, 79% and 94%, respectively, with a global accuracy of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: CMR-MPI had a very high accuracy for detection of functionally significant CAD as assessed by FFR in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI) is considered a state of the art non-invasive modality for the detection of reversible ischemia. Recent studies have shown its utility in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and superiority over other established techniques. However, only a few studies compared CMR-MPI against the invasive standard including fractional flow reserve (FFR) and clinical validation in non-specialized centers is scarce. The aim of this study was to validate CMR-MPI in a real-world clinical environment and to test its diagnostic accuracy in symptomatic patients with suspected CAD versus FFR as the reference standard of functionally significant disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: 103 symptomatic consecutive patients (62 ± 8.0 years, 66% males) with suspected CAD and intermediate or high probability of disease underwent sequential CMR and invasive coronary angiography (XA). The CMR protocol included stress-rest adenosine perfusion, SSFP cine imaging and late-enhancement imaging. Functionally significant CAD was defined as occlusive/sub-occlusive stenoses on XA or non-occlusive stenoses with a FFR measurement of <0.80 in vessels >2mm. On a patient-based model, CMR-MPI had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 89%, 88%, 85%, and 91%, respectively, with a global accuracy of 88%. On a vessel-based analysis, these values were 80%, 93%, 79% and 94%, respectively, with a global accuracy of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: CMR-MPI had a very high accuracy for detection of functionally significant CAD as assessed by FFR in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability.
Authors: Amit R Patel; Michael Salerno; Raymond Y Kwong; Amita Singh; Bobak Heydari; Christopher M Kramer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 27.203
Authors: Francisco Sampaio; Pablo Lamata; Nuno Bettencourt; Sophie Charlotte Alt; Nuno Ferreira; Johannes Tammo Kowallick; Joana Pimenta; Shelby Kutty; José Fraga; Michael Steinmetz; Paulo Bettencourt; Vasco Gama; Andreas Schuster Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Louise Nissen; Simon Winther; Christin Isaksen; June Anita Ejlersen; Lau Brix; Grazina Urbonaviciene; Lars Frost; Lene Helleskov Madsen; Lars Lyhne Knudsen; Samuel Emil Schmidt; Niels Ramsing Holm; Michael Maeng; Mette Nyegaard; Hans Erik Bøtker; Morten Bøttcher Journal: Trials Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Sophie Paddock; Vasiliki Tsampasian; Hosamadin Assadi; Bruno Calife Mota; Andrew J Swift; Amrit Chowdhary; Peter Swoboda; Eylem Levelt; Eva Sammut; Amardeep Dastidar; Jordi Broncano Cabrero; Javier Royuela Del Val; Paul Malcolm; Julia Sun; Alisdair Ryding; Chris Sawh; Richard Greenwood; David Hewson; Vassilios Vassiliou; Pankaj Garg Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-07-07