Literature DB >> 23102527

Predictors of mortality of mechanically ventilated patients in internal medicine wards.

Moshe Hersch1, Gabriel Izbicki, David Dahan, Gabriel S Breuer, Gideon Nesher, Sharon Einav.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Budget restrictions have led to shortage of intensive care unit (ICU) beds in several countries. Consequently, ventilated patients are often kept on the wards. This study examined survival likelihood among patients ventilated on the wards and the predictive value of commonly used severity-of-illness scores.
METHODS: This study is a prospective observation and characterization of consecutive, mechanically ventilated patients in 3 internal medicine wards of a single hospital who were denied ICU admission. Outcome measures are as follows: 28-day mortality, survival to hospital discharge, and 3 months postdischarge.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were examined. The patients were 78.9 ± 8.9 years old; 53% were independent preadmission. Respiratory insufficiency due to infection was the main reason for mechanical ventilation (58%). Charlson and acute physiology scores (APS) averaged 4 ± 2.2 and 91.8 ± 26.7, respectively. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 71%, whereas in-hospital mortality was 74% and 3 months postdischarge mortality was 79%. Survivors were significantly younger than nonsurvivors (74.4 ± 8.5 years vs 80.4 ± 8.6 years, P < .01), were more likely to be ventilated for cardiac causes (41% vs 11%, P = .04), and had significantly higher initial mean blood pressure (79.4 mm Hg vs 58.2 mm Hg, P = .02) and blood albumin levels (29.8 g/L vs 25.7 g/L, P = .05). Death rate was 10 times more likely, with an APS greater than 90 on the day of intubation as compared with an APS less than 90.
CONCLUSION: Mortality in patients ventilated on the ward was high, especially in the subgroup of patients with an APS score greater than 90. The early calculation of APS may assist in focusing therapeutic efforts on patients with better survival chances.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23102527     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  7 in total

1.  Bedside Tracheostomy: Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Vikas Sinha; Sushil G Jha; Samanth Talagauara Umesh; Nirav P Chaudhari; Bhagirathsinh D Parmar; Rashmin S Patel
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-20

2.  Mechanical ventilation in medical departments: a necessary evil, or a blessing in bad disguise?

Authors:  Yuval Schwartz; Amir Jarjoui; Amos M Yinnon
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2019-06-03

3.  Survival predictors after intubation in medical wards: A prospective study in 151 patients.

Authors:  Dimitrios Basoulis; Stavros Liatis; Marina Skouloudi; Konstantinos Makrilakis; Georgios L Daikos; Petros P Sfikakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Machine Learning Models to Predict 30-Day Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Authors:  Jong Ho Kim; Young Suk Kwon; Moon Seong Baek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy versus Open Surgical Tracheostomy in Non-ICU Patients.

Authors:  Evgeni Brotfain; Leonid Koyfman; Amit Frenkel; Michael Semyonov; Jochanan G Peiser; Hagit Hayun-Maman; Matthew Boyko; Shaun E Gruenbaum; Alexander Zlotnik; Moti Klein
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-12

6.  Mechanical ventilation patterns and trends over 20 years in an Israeli hospital system: policy ramifications.

Authors:  Rachel Yaffa Zisk-Rony; Charles Weissman; Yoram G Weiss
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2019-02-01

7.  Survival of mechanically ventilated ward patients and association with organisational factors: a multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  Wai-Tat Wong; Anna Lee; Charles David Gomersall; Lam-Hin Shek; Alfred Chan; Sheung-On So; Kai-Cheuk Sin; Wai-Ming Tang; Maria Sinn; Lowell Ling
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.