BACKGROUND: Randomized trials assess the potential of a medical device in well defined indications while "all comer studies" reveal the device performance in the real clinical environment. AIMS: This 'all comers' registry assessed the 10-month outcome of the Coroflex(®) Please drug-eluting stent in Europe and Asia by clinically driven major adverse cardiac events. METHODS: The Coroflex(®) Please Registry was an international, prospective, multicenter registry enrolling patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months. Secondary endpoints were technical success, in-hospital outcomes, definite stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) for subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Of the enrolled 1230 patients (63.6 ± 11.2 years, 33.9% diabetics), 339 (27.6%) had an acute coronary syndrome, 148 (12.1%) STEMI and 191 (15.6%) NSTEMI. After 10.5 ± 3.8 months (follow-up rate 92.8%), the target lesion revascularization rate (TLR) was 7.8% overall, 8.3% in STEMI, and 11.3% in NSTEMI patients. Total MACE was 11.1% and significantly higher in ACS with either diabetes mellitus (22.9%, p = 0.017) or age ≥75 years (25.4%, p = 0.026). In European and Asian patients MI rates (5.2% vs 3.1%, p = 0.135) and cardiac death rates (1.6% vs 0.9%, p = 0.414) were similar. The MACE rate was higher in Europe (13.6% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001) driven by a six times higher TLR rate. CONCLUSIONS: TLR and MACE occurred within the range of previously published data. The incidence of MI and cardiac death were not different between Europe and Asia. MACE were higher in Europe driven by target lesion revascularization.
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials assess the potential of a medical device in well defined indications while "all comer studies" reveal the device performance in the real clinical environment. AIMS: This 'all comers' registry assessed the 10-month outcome of the Coroflex(®) Please drug-eluting stent in Europe and Asia by clinically driven major adverse cardiac events. METHODS: The Coroflex(®) Please Registry was an international, prospective, multicenter registry enrolling patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months. Secondary endpoints were technical success, in-hospital outcomes, definite stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) for subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Of the enrolled 1230 patients (63.6 ± 11.2 years, 33.9% diabetics), 339 (27.6%) had an acute coronary syndrome, 148 (12.1%) STEMI and 191 (15.6%) NSTEMI. After 10.5 ± 3.8 months (follow-up rate 92.8%), the target lesion revascularization rate (TLR) was 7.8% overall, 8.3% in STEMI, and 11.3% in NSTEMI patients. Total MACE was 11.1% and significantly higher in ACS with either diabetes mellitus (22.9%, p = 0.017) or age ≥75 years (25.4%, p = 0.026). In European and Asian patientsMI rates (5.2% vs 3.1%, p = 0.135) and cardiac death rates (1.6% vs 0.9%, p = 0.414) were similar. The MACE rate was higher in Europe (13.6% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001) driven by a six times higher TLR rate. CONCLUSIONS: TLR and MACE occurred within the range of previously published data. The incidence of MI and cardiac death were not different between Europe and Asia. MACE were higher in Europe driven by target lesion revascularization.
Authors: Andrzej Ciszewski; Maciej Karcz; Cezary Kepka; Paweł Bekta; Ewa Ksiezycka; Jakub Przyłuski; Artur Debski; Adam Witkowski; Witold Ruzyłło Journal: Kardiol Pol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.108
Authors: Marcus Wiemer; Ralf Degenhardt; Christian Vallbracht; Dieter Horstkotte; Henrik Schneider; Christoph Nienaber; Wolfgang Bocksch; Michael Boxberger; Martin Unverdorben Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Ibrahim Akin; Alexander Bufe; Steffen Schneider; Holger Reinecke; Lars Eckardt; Gert Richardt; Detlev Burska; Jochen Senges; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Christoph A Nienaber Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Martin Unverdorben; Ralf Degenhardt; Marcus Wiemer; Dieter Horstkotte; Henrik Schneider; Christoph Nienaber; Wolfgang Bocksch; Michael Gross; Michael Boxberger; Christian Vallbracht Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ole Fröbert; Bo Lagerqvist; Jörg Carlsson; Johan Lindbäck; Ulf Stenestrand; Stefan K James Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Pieter J Vlaar; Ryan J Lennon; Charanjit S Rihal; Mandeep Singh; Henry H Ting; John F Bresnahan; David R Holmes Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Ehtisham Mahmud; John A Ormiston; Mark A Turco; Jeffrey J Popma; Neil J Weissman; Charles D O'Shaughnessy; Tift Mann; Jack J Hall; Thomas F McGarry; Louis A Cannon; Mark W I Webster; Lazar Mandinov; Donald S Baim Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Upendra Kaul; Martin Unverdorben; Ralf Degenhardt; Ashok Seth; Vinay K Bahl; Shirish M S Hiremath; Praveen Chandra; Ajit S Mullesari; P S Sandhu; Seshagiri Rao; Oommen George; Hanns Ackermann; Michael Boxberger Journal: Indian Heart J Date: 2013-09-13
Authors: Florian Krackhardt; Matthias Waliszewski; Wan Azman Wan Ahmad; Viktor Kočka; Petr Toušek; Bronislav Janek; Milan Trenčan; Peter Krajči; Fernando Lozano; Koldobika Garcia-San Roman; Imanol Otaegui Irurueta; Bruno Garcia Del Blanco; Lucie Wachowiak; Victoria Vilalta Del Olmo; Eduard Fernandez Nofrerías; Myung Ho Jeong; Byung-Chun Jung; Kyu-Rock Han; Christophe Piot; Laurent Sebagh; Jérôme Rischner; Michel Pansieri; Matthias Leschke; Tae Hoon Ahn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 3.240