Literature DB >> 23102234

Three-dimensional printing of soy protein scaffolds for tissue regeneration.

Karen B Chien1, Emmanuella Makridakis, Ramille N Shah.   

Abstract

Fabricating three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffolds with controlled structure and geometry is crucial for tissue regeneration. To date, exploration in printing 3D natural protein scaffolds is limited. In this study, soy protein slurry was successfully printed using the 3D Bioplotter to form scaffolds. A method to verify the structural integrity of resulting scaffolds during printing was developed. This process involved measuring the mass extrusion flow rate of the slurry from the instrument, which was directly affected by the extrusion pressure and the soy protein slurry properties. The optimal mass flow rate for printing soy slurry at 27°C was 0.0072±0.0002 g/s. The addition of dithiothreitol to soy slurries demonstrated the importance of disulfide bonds in forming solid structures upon printing. Resulting Bioplotted soy protein scaffolds were cured using 95% ethanol and post-treated using dehydrothermal treatment (DHT), a combination of freeze-drying and DHT, and chemical crosslinking using 1-ethyl-3-(3 dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) chemistry. Surface morphologies of the different treatment groups were characterized using scanning electron microscopy. Scaffold properties, including relative crosslink density, mass loss upon rinsing, and compressive modulus revealed that EDC crosslinked scaffolds were the most robust with moduli of approximately 4 kPa. Scaffold geometry (45° and 90° layer rotations) affected the mechanical properties for DHT and EDC crosslinked scaffolds. Seeding efficiency of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) was highest for nontreated and thermally treated scaffolds, and all scaffolds supported hMSC viability over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23102234     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  16 in total

1.  Flow Behavior Prior to Crosslinking: The Need for Precursor Rheology for Placement of Hydrogels in Medical Applications and for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Emily C Beck; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 29.190

2.  Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Robert J Morrison; Scott J Hollister; Matthew F Niedner; Maryam Ghadimi Mahani; Albert H Park; Deepak K Mehta; Richard G Ohye; Glenn E Green
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Soy Protein/Cellulose Nanofiber Scaffolds Mimicking Skin Extracellular Matrix for Enhanced Wound Healing.

Authors:  Seungkuk Ahn; Christophe O Chantre; Alanna R Gannon; Johan U Lind; Patrick H Campbell; Thomas Grevesse; Blakely B O'Connor; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Fabrication and development of artificial osteochondral constructs based on cancellous bone/hydrogel hybrid scaffold.

Authors:  Kedong Song; Liying Li; Xinyu Yan; Yu Zhang; Ruipeng Li; Yiwei Wang; Ling Wang; Hong Wang; Tianqing Liu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  From Microscale Devices to 3D Printing: Advances in Fabrication of 3D Cardiovascular Tissues.

Authors:  Anton V Borovjagin; Brenda M Ogle; Joel L Berry; Jianyi Zhang
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Recent Advances in 3D Printing with Protein-Based Inks.

Authors:  Xuan Mu; Francesca Agostinacchio; Ning Xiang; Ying Pei; Yousef Khan; Chengchen Guo; Peggy Cebe; Antonella Motta; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 29.190

7.  Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials.

Authors:  Helena N Chia; Benjamin M Wu
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Three-dimensional printing models improve understanding of spinal fracture--A randomized controlled study in China.

Authors:  Zhenzhu Li; Zefu Li; Ruiyu Xu; Meng Li; Jianmin Li; Yongliang Liu; Dehua Sui; Wensheng Zhang; Zheng Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Usefulness Of Three-Dimensional Printing Models for Patients with Stoma Construction.

Authors:  Tetsuro Tominaga; Katsunori Takagi; Hiroaki Takeshita; Tomo Miyamoto; Kozue Shimoda; Ayano Matsuo; Keitaro Matsumoto; Shigekazu Hidaka; Naoya Yamasaki; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-11

Review 10.  Recent advances in bioprinting techniques: approaches, applications and future prospects.

Authors:  Jipeng Li; Mingjiao Chen; Xianqun Fan; Huifang Zhou
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.