Literature DB >> 23101792

Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive and open pyeloplasty.

Ugur Boylu1, Cem Basatac, Turgay Turan, Fikret Fatih Onol, Eyup Gumus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2010, 20 patients underwent transperitoneal minimally invasive (13 robot-assisted and 7 laparoscopic) pyeloplasty, and 22 patients underwent conventional open pyeloplasty. Operative and functional outcomes were compared between the minimally invasive and open pyeloplasty groups. The statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, unpaired t test, and Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: The mean age was 31 years in the minimally invasive group and 27 years in the open group. The mean operative time was 131 minutes in the minimally invasive group and 128 minutes in the open group (P=.71). The estimated blood loss was 30 mL in the minimally invasive group and 108 mL in the open group (P=.001). The drain was removed after 1.75 days and 4.48 days in the minimally invasive and open groups, respectively (P=.001). The mean hospital stay was 1.94 days and 4.19 days in the minimally invasive and open groups, respectively (P=.001). Crossing vessels were observed in 21% of all patients, and the transposition of the ureter was performed in all patients with an anterior crossing vessel. One patient in each group had symptomatic and radiographic recurrence and persistently obstructed drainage pattern on diuretic renography. The radiographic and symptomatic success rate was 95% in the minimally invasive group and 95.5% in the open group.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive pyeloplasty has low morbidity, short length of stay, and less blood loss compared with open surgical repair. It is an effective and feasible minimally invasive treatment modality for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23101792     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

1.  Is confirmation of ureteric stent placement in laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessary?

Authors:  D B Hennessey; N J Kinnear; R M Evans; C Hagan; A Thwaini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Cem Başataç; Uğur Boylu; Fikret Fatih Önol; Eyüp Gümüş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-03

3.  Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty procedures: a series of 18 patients.

Authors:  Kemal Ener; Serkan Altınova; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Muhammet Fuat Özcan; Erem Asil; Emre Ürer; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Ziya Akbulut
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junctions Obstruction in Adults: 6 Years' Experience in One Center.

Authors:  Rikke Søgaard Tolstrup; Marie Thue Pank; Lotte Sander; Torben Dørflinger
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-06-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Uretero-Pelvic Junction Stenosis: Considerations on the Appropriate Timing of Correction Based on an Infant Population Treated with a Minimally-Invasive Technique.

Authors:  Mario Lima; Niel Di Salvo; Andrea Portoraro; Michela Maffi; Giovanni Parente; Vincenzo Davide Catania; Tommaso Gargano
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Transperitoneal mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty and concomitant ureteroscopy-assisted pyelolithotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by renal caliceal stones.

Authors:  Zhi Chen; Peng Zhou; Zhong-Qing Yang; Yang Li; Yan-Cheng Luo; Yao He; Nan-Nan Li; Chao-Qun Xie; Chen Lai; Xiao-Long Fang; Xiang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Defining the pros and cons of open, conventional laparoscopy, and robot-assisted pyeloplasty in a developing nation.

Authors:  Mrinal Pahwa; Archna R Pahwa; Mohit Girotra; Rtika Ryfka Abrahm; Sachin Kathuria; Ajay Sharma
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2014-02-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.