Literature DB >> 23100680

Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action.

Devendra K Choudhary1, Anil Prakash, B N Johri.   

Abstract

Plants possess a range of active defense apparatuses that can be actively expressed in response to biotic stresses (pathogens and parasites) of various scales (ranging from microscopic viruses to phytophagous insect). The timing of this defense response is critical and reflects on the difference between coping and succumbing to such biotic challenge of necrotizing pathogens/parasites. If defense mechanisms are triggered by a stimulus prior to infection by a plant pathogen, disease can be reduced. Induced resistance is a state of enhanced defensive capacity developed by a plant when appropriately stimulated. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR) are two forms of induced resistance wherein plant defenses are preconditioned by prior infection or treatment that results in resistance against subsequent challenge by a pathogen or parasite. Selected strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) suppress diseases by antagonism between the bacteria and soil-borne pathogens as well as by inducing a systemic resistance in plant against both root and foliar pathogens. Rhizobacteria mediated ISR resembles that of pathogen induced SAR in that both types of induced resistance render uninfected plant parts more resistant towards a broad spectrum of plant pathogens. Several rhizobacteria trigger the salicylic acid (SA)-dependent SAR pathway by producing SA at the root surface whereas other rhizobacteria trigger different signaling pathway independent of SA. The existence of SA-independent ISR pathway has been studied in Arabidopsis thaliana, which is dependent on jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene signaling. Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in viz., carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco, and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation. Combination of ISR and SAR can increase protection against pathogens that are resisted through both pathways besides extended protection to a broader spectrum of pathogens than ISR/SAR alone. Beside Pseudomonas strains, ISR is conducted by Bacillus spp. wherein published results show that several specific strains of species B. amyloliquifaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B.sphaericus elicit significant reduction in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Induced systemic resistance; Jasmonate and ethylene signalling; Pathogenesis-related proteins; SAR; Signalling and expression

Year:  2008        PMID: 23100680      PMCID: PMC3450033          DOI: 10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Microbiol        ISSN: 0046-8991            Impact factor:   2.461


  26 in total

Review 1.  Plant perception systems for pathogen recognition and defence.

Authors:  Lourdes Gómez-Gómez
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 2.  Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads.

Authors:  Dieter Haas; Geneviève Défago
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants.

Authors:  Hamid Meziane; Ientse VAN DER Sluis; Leendert C VAN Loon; Monica Höfte; Peter A H M Bakker
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 5.663

4.  The role of lipopolysaccharides in induction of plant defence responses.

Authors:  Gitte Erbs; Mari-Anne Newman
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 5.663

Review 5.  NPR1, all things considered.

Authors:  Xinnian Dong
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.834

6.  Stimulation of the lipoxygenase pathway is associated with systemic resistance induced in bean by a nonpathogenic Pseudomonas strain.

Authors:  Marc Ongena; Francéline Duby; Fanny Rossignol; Marie-Laure Fauconnier; Jacques Dommes; Philippe Thonart
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 7.  Signal transduction in plant-beneficial rhizobacteria with biocontrol properties.

Authors:  Dieter Haas; Christoph Keel; Cornelia Reimmann
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 8.  Systemic acquired resistance.

Authors:  W E Durrant; X Dong
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.078

9.  Salicylic Acid Produced by the Rhizobacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 Induces Resistance to Leaf Infection by Botrytis cinerea on Bean.

Authors:  G De Meyer; M Höfte
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Induced systemic protection against tomato late blight elicited by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.

Authors:  Zhinong Yan; M S Reddy; Choong-Min Ryu; John A McInroy; Mark Wilson; Joseph W Kloepper
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  Disease management of tomato through PGPB: current trends and future perspective.

Authors:  Vipin Kumar Singh; Amit Kishore Singh; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  The integration of transcriptomic and transgenic analyses reveals the involvement of the SA response pathway in the defense of chrysanthemum against the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria sp.

Authors:  Xiting Zhao; Lingyu Song; Liwei Jiang; Yuting Zhu; Qinghui Gao; Dandan Wang; Jing Xie; Meng Lv; Ping Liu; Mingjun Li
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.793

3.  Induced defense-related proteins in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) plants by Carnobacterium sp. SJ-5 upon challenge inoculation of Fusarium oxysporum.

Authors:  Shekhar Jain; Devendra Kumar Choudhary
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  MLP-PG1, a major latex-like protein identified in Cucurbita pepo, confers resistance through the induction of pathogenesis-related genes.

Authors:  Kentaro Fujita; Soichiro Asuke; Erika Isono; Ryouhei Yoshihara; Yuichi Uno; Hideyuki Inui
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  A Bjerkandera adust new strain as a potential biocontrol agent against wheat scab.

Authors:  Suping Li; Yong Li; Xiao Feng; Jingjie Zhang; Xinhua He
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.097

Review 6.  The Rhizosphere Microbiome of Ginseng.

Authors:  Paul H Goodwin
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-02

7.  Reprogramming of fatty acid and oxylipin synthesis in rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in tomato.

Authors:  Martin Mariutto; Marie-Laure Fauconnier; Marc Ongena; Morgan Laloux; Jean-Paul Wathelet; Patrick du Jardin; Philippe Thonart; Jacques Dommes
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Genetic responses induced in olive roots upon colonization by the biocontrol endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7.

Authors:  Elisabetta Schilirò; Massimo Ferrara; Franco Nigro; Jesús Mercado-Blanco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Epl1 and Sm1 proteins from Trichoderma atroviride and Trichoderma virens differentially modulate systemic disease resistance against different life style pathogens in Solanum lycopersicum.

Authors:  Miguel A Salas-Marina; María I Isordia-Jasso; María A Islas-Osuna; Pablo Delgado-Sánchez; Juan F Jiménez-Bremont; Margarita Rodríguez-Kessler; María T Rosales-Saavedra; Alfredo Herrera-Estrella; Sergio Casas-Flores
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Harnessing phytomicrobiome signaling for rhizosphere microbiome engineering.

Authors:  Liliana Quiza; Marc St-Arnaud; Etienne Yergeau
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.