Literature DB >> 23100598

Comparison of flight speed and exit score as measurements of temperament in beef cattle.

M D D Vetters1, T E Engle, J K Ahola, T Grandin.   

Abstract

Observations were collected for the purpose of comparing exit velocity measurements in the form of exit score (ES; walk, trot, canter, or run) and flight speed (FS) as assessments of cattle temperament. Squeeze chute exit velocity was obtained for 1,181 crossbred yearling steers using ES and FS temperament systems. Flight speed used infrared sensors to determine the time taken for an animal to traverse a fixed distance of 1.83 m after exiting the squeeze chute. Exit score (1=walk, 2=trot, 3=canter, and 4=run) was assigned by 2 different observers when each steer crossed a fixed point between the infrared sensors. All animals were scored with each system (ES and FS) simultaneously on exiting the squeeze chute on d -21 and d -1 of the experiment. Of the 1,181 cattle, 357 were moved to a nearby research feedyard for use in a 140 d feedlot trial. These cattle were scored using both measurement systems and BW was recorded at 35 d intervals throughout the trial. Exit score was assessed for observer reliability, ES and FS were compared for measurement repeatability, and both were assessed on ability to predict ADG. Exit score between observers on a single day showed considerable agreement (weighted Kappa=0.66), indicating the system was reliable between different observers. However, the agreement for a single observer between day was only moderate (weighted Kappa=0.40), indicating a day effect for ES. In addition, although mean velocities for day were not different (P>0.18; FS=2.98±.87 and 3.02±0.87 m/s for day, respectively), the persistence of FS for each animal was low (Spearman rank correlation coefficient=0.25). The frequency that an animal would be placed into the same third of FS or receive the same ES on consecutive weigh days was 50% and 60.0%, respectively, and both were moderate predictors of ADG (R2=0.14 and R2=0.17). These data indicate that ES and FS are reliable instruments for assessment of temperament on a given day, and show moderate repeatability across days. Exit score and FS show similar ability to predict ADG and can be used interchangeably as measures of temperament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23100598     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Minor corral changes and adoption of good handling practices can improve the behavior and reduce cortisol release in Nellore cows.

Authors:  Maria Lúcia Pereira Lima; João Alberto Negrão; Claudia Cristina Paro de Paz; Temple Grandin
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Evaluation of tropically adapted straightbred and crossbred beef cattle: Cortisol concentration and measures of temperament at weaning and transport.

Authors:  C C Chase; R D Randel; D G Riley; S W Coleman; W A Phillips
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Cattle acclimate more substantially to repeated handling when confined individually in a pen than when assessed as a group.

Authors:  Jamie T Parham; Amy E Tanner; Sarah R Blevins; Mark L Wahlberg; Ronald M Lewis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.338

4.  Genome-Wide Association Study between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Flight Speed in Nellore Cattle.

Authors:  Tiago Silva Valente; Fernando Baldi; Aline Cristina Sant'Anna; Lucia Galvão Albuquerque; Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Applying a New Proposed Welfare Assessment Protocol to Suckler Herds from Three Different Autochthonous Breeds.

Authors:  Diana Valente; George Stilwell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 6.  How Farm Animals React and Perceive Stressful Situations Such As Handling, Restraint, and Transport.

Authors:  Temple Grandin; Chelsey Shivley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The Influence of Temperament on Body Temperature Response to Handling in Angus Cattle.

Authors:  Angela M Lees; Hannah E Salvin; Ian G Colditz; Caroline Lee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Effect of Different Finishing Strategies and Steer Temperament on Animal Welfare and Instrumental Meat Tenderness.

Authors:  Marcia Del Campo; Xavier Manteca; Juan Manuel Soares de Lima; Gustavo Brito; Pilar Hernández; Carlos Sañudo; Fabio Montossi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.