Literature DB >> 23100580

Postprandial changes of fiber-degrading microbes in the rumen of sheep fed diets varying in type of forage as monitored by real-time PCR and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis.

C Saro1, M J Ranilla, M D Carro.   

Abstract

Four ruminally cannulated sheep were used in a crossover design to assess the postprandial changes of fiber-degrading microbes in the solid phase of the rumen of sheep fed 2 high-forage diets. The diets had forage:concentrate ratio of 70:30 (DM basis) and either alfalfa (Medicago sativa) hay (AL) or grass hay (GR) as forage (FOR). Sheep were fed twice daily, and samples from solid rumen digesta were taken at 0, 4, and 8 h after the morning feeding. Postprandial changes of DNA concentrations of all determined microbial populations were similar for the 2 diets. Samples taken at 4 h after feeding had lesser (P < 0.05) concentrations of total bacterial DNA determined with real-time PCR and bacterial diversity and greater (P < 0.05) protozoal DNA concentrations, relative abundance of fungal, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminococcus albus DNA compared with those taken at 0 and 8 h. No effect (P = 0.41 to 0.76) of FOR was detected either on concentrations of bacterial and protozoal DNA or the relative abundance of the 2 Ruminococcus DNA, but GR diet promoted greater (P < 0.001) relative abundance of F. succinogenes and fungal DNA compared with AL diet. Fibrobacter succinogenes was the most abundant (P < 0.05) of the 3 cellulolytic bacteria for both diets, with no differences (P < 0.05) between the 2 Ruminococcus species. Rumen pH and carboxymethylcellulase, Avicelase, and amylase activities were not affected (P = 0.15 to 0.69) by FOR, but xylanase activity was greater (P = 0.01) for GR diet. The influence of FOR on microbial communities in ruminal solid digesta was more evident in the first hours after feeding than at later times after feeding, which highlights the influence of sampling time when investigating dietary effects on rumen function and microbial populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23100580     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Characterization of the cellulolytic bacteria communities along the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese Mongolian sheep by using PCR-DGGE and real-time PCR analysis.

Authors:  Yan Zeng; Dong Zeng; Yan Zhang; Xueqin Ni; Yurui Tang; Hui Zhu; Hesong Wang; Zhongqiong Yin; Kangcheng Pan; Bo Jing
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Bacterial diversity dynamics associated with different diets and different primer pairs in the rumen of Kankrej cattle.

Authors:  Dipti W Pitta; Nidhi Parmar; Amrut K Patel; Nagaraju Indugu; Sanjay Kumar; Karsanbhai B Prajapathi; Anand B Patel; Bhaskar Reddy; Chaitanya Joshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Dietary energy drives the dynamic response of bovine rumen viral communities.

Authors:  Christopher L Anderson; Matthew B Sullivan; Samodha C Fernando
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 14.650

4.  Studies on bacterial community composition are affected by the time and storage method of the rumen content.

Authors:  Yury Tatiana Granja-Salcedo; Ricardo Andrés Ramirez-Uscategui; Elwi Guillermo Machado; Juliana Duarte Messana; Luciano Takeshi Kishi; Ana Veronica Lino Dias; Telma Teresinha Berchielli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Gut Microbiota of Wild and Captive Alpine Musk Deer (Moschus chrysogaster).

Authors:  Yewen Sun; Yujiao Sun; Zhihui Shi; Zhensheng Liu; Chang Zhao; Taofeng Lu; Hui Gao; Feng Zhu; Rui Chen; Jun Zhang; Ruliang Pan; Baoguo Li; Liwei Teng; Songtao Guo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses.

Authors:  Carl J Yeoman; Christopher J Fields; Pascale Lepercq; Philippe Ruiz; Evelyne Forano; Bryan A White; Pascale Mosoni
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Composition of Ileal Bacterial Community in Grazing Goats Varies across Non-rumination, Transition and Rumination Stages of Life.

Authors:  Jinzhen Jiao; Jian Wu; Chuanshe Zhou; Shaoxun Tang; Min Wang; Zhiliang Tan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.