Literature DB >> 23100273

Acoustic emission analysis of tooth-composite interfacial debonding.

N Y Cho1, J L Ferracane, I B Lee.   

Abstract

This study detected tooth-composite interfacial debonding during composite restoration by means of acoustic emission (AE) analysis and investigated the effects of composite properties and adhesives on AE characteristics. The polymerization shrinkage, peak shrinkage rate, flexural modulus, and shrinkage stress of a methacrylate-based universal hybrid, a flowable, and a silorane-based composite were measured. Class I cavities on 49 extracted premolars were restored with 1 of the 3 composites and 1 of the following adhesives: 2 etch-and-rinse adhesives, 2 self-etch adhesives, and an adhesive for the silorane-based composite. AE analysis was done for 2,000 sec during light-curing. The silorane-based composite exhibited the lowest shrinkage (rate), the longest time to peak shrinkage rate, the lowest shrinkage stress, and the fewest AE events. AE events were detected immediately after the beginning of light-curing in most composite-adhesive combinations, but not until 40 sec after light-curing began for the silorane-based composite. AE events were concentrated at the initial stage of curing in self-etch adhesives compared with etch-and-rinse adhesives. Reducing the shrinkage (rate) of composites resulted in reduced shrinkage stress and less debonding, as evidenced by fewer AE events. AE is an effective technique for monitoring, in real time, the debonding kinetics at the tooth-composite interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23100273     DOI: 10.1177/0022034512465757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  4 in total

1.  Effect of different composite modulation protocols on the conversion and polymerization stress profile of bulk-filled resin restorations.

Authors:  M C G Erhardt; M Goulart; R C Jacques; J A Rodrigues; C S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Effect of composite type and placement technique on cuspal strain.

Authors:  Vilhelm G Ólafsson; André V Ritter; Edward J Swift; Lee W Boushell; Ching-Chang Ko; Gabrielle R Jackson; Sumitha N Ahmed; Terence E Donovan
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.843

Review 3.  Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II.

Authors:  Kantheti Sirisha; Tankonda Rambabu; Yalavarthi Ravishankar; Pabbati Ravikumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-09

4.  Use of acoustic emission to identify novel candidate biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Authors:  Daniela K Schlüter; Lucy Spain; Wei Quan; Harry Southworth; Nicola Platt; Joe Mercer; Lik-Kwan Shark; John C Waterton; Mike Bowes; Peter J Diggle; Mandy Dixon; Jane Huddleston; John Goodacre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.