PURPOSE: SuPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) and PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor 1) are active in the coagulation-fibrinolysis pathway. Both have been suggested as biomarkers for disease severity. We evaluated them in prediction of mortality, acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in operative and non-operative ventilated patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Blood samples and data of intensive care were collected. Mechanically ventilated patients with baseline suPAR and PAI-1 measurements were included in the analysis, and healthy volunteers were analysed for comparison. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC), logistic regression, likelihood ratios and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed. RESULTS: Baseline suPAR was 11.6 ng/ml (quartiles Q1-Q3, 9.6-14.0), compared to healthy volunteers with suPAR of 0.6 ng/ml (0.5-11.0). PAI-1 concentrations were 2.67 ng/ml (1.53-4.69) and 0.3 ng/ml (0.3-0.4), respectively. ROC analysis for suPAR 90-day mortality areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) 0.61 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.67), sepsis 0.68 (0.61-0.76), ALI/ARDS 0.64 (0.56-0.73) and RRT 0.65 (0.56-0.73). Patients with the highest quartile of suPAR concentrations had an odds ratio of 2.52 (1.37-4.64, p = 0.003) for 90-day mortality and 3.16 (1.19-8.41, p = 0.02) for ALI/ARDS. In non-operative patients, the AUC's for suPAR were 90-day mortality 0.61 (0.54-0.68), RRT 0.73 (0.64-0.83), sepsis 0.70 (0.60-0.80), ALI/ARDS 0.61 (0.51-0.71). Predictive value of PAI-1 was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: In non-operative patients, low concentrations of suPAR were predictive for survival and high concentrations for RRT and mortality. SuPAR may be used for screening for patients with potentially good survival. The association with RRT may supply an early warning sign for acute renal failure.
PURPOSE:SuPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) and PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor 1) are active in the coagulation-fibrinolysis pathway. Both have been suggested as biomarkers for disease severity. We evaluated them in prediction of mortality, acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in operative and non-operative ventilated patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Blood samples and data of intensive care were collected. Mechanically ventilated patients with baseline suPAR and PAI-1 measurements were included in the analysis, and healthy volunteers were analysed for comparison. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC), logistic regression, likelihood ratios and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed. RESULTS: Baseline suPAR was 11.6 ng/ml (quartiles Q1-Q3, 9.6-14.0), compared to healthy volunteers with suPAR of 0.6 ng/ml (0.5-11.0). PAI-1 concentrations were 2.67 ng/ml (1.53-4.69) and 0.3 ng/ml (0.3-0.4), respectively. ROC analysis for suPAR 90-day mortality areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) 0.61 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.67), sepsis 0.68 (0.61-0.76), ALI/ARDS 0.64 (0.56-0.73) and RRT 0.65 (0.56-0.73). Patients with the highest quartile of suPAR concentrations had an odds ratio of 2.52 (1.37-4.64, p = 0.003) for 90-day mortality and 3.16 (1.19-8.41, p = 0.02) for ALI/ARDS. In non-operative patients, the AUC's for suPAR were 90-day mortality 0.61 (0.54-0.68), RRT 0.73 (0.64-0.83), sepsis 0.70 (0.60-0.80), ALI/ARDS 0.61 (0.51-0.71). Predictive value of PAI-1 was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: In non-operative patients, low concentrations of suPAR were predictive for survival and high concentrations for RRT and mortality. SuPAR may be used for screening for patients with potentially good survival. The association with RRT may supply an early warning sign for acute renal failure.
Authors: G R Bernard; A Artigas; K L Brigham; J Carlet; K Falke; L Hudson; M Lamy; J R Legall; A Morris; R Spragg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter Dahlem; Albert P Bos; Jack J Haitsma; Marcus J Schultz; Joost C M Meijers; Burkhard Lachmann Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-03-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Kathleen D Liu; David V Glidden; Mark D Eisner; Polly E Parsons; Lorraine B Ware; Arthur Wheeler; Anna Korpak; B Taylor Thompson; Glenn M Chertow; Michael A Matthay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Alexander Koch; Sebastian Voigt; Carsten Kruschinski; Edouard Sanson; Hanna Dückers; Andreas Horn; Eray Yagmur; Henning Zimmermann; Christian Trautwein; Frank Tacke Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Diederik G P J Geboers; Friso M de Beer; Anita M Tuip-de Boer; Tom van der Poll; Janneke Horn; Olaf L Cremer; Marc J M Bonten; David S Y Ong; Marcus J Schultz; Lieuwe D J Bos Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Elie Azoulay; Giuseppe Citerio; Jan Bakker; Matteo Bassetti; Dominique Benoit; Maurizio Cecconi; J Randall Curtis; Glenn Hernandez; Margaret Herridge; Samir Jaber; Michael Joannidis; Laurent Papazian; Mark Peters; Pierre Singer; Martin Smith; Marcio Soares; Antoni Torres; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-François Timsit Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jan Willem Kuiper; A B Johan Groeneveld; Jack J Haitsma; Lonneke Smeding; Mark P V Begieneman; Serge Jothy; Rosanna Vaschetto; Frans B Plötz Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 2.388