Dinesh Arya1. 1. Mental Health Service, Hunter New England Local Health District, and Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. Dinesh.Arya@NT.gov.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Current legislative provisions for compulsory treatment of people with mental illness allow decisions to treat people under compulsion to be made on the basis of presence of a mental illness or mental disorder without consideration of whether the patient has the capacity to make decisions that are in his/her best interest. Issues of autonomy, equity, justice and beneficence in relation to treatment of people with mental illness are explored to determine decision-making rules that should be applied for compulsory mental health treatment. CONCLUSIONS: It is proposed that assessment of the capacity of the individual to make decisions in his/her best interest, rather than presence of diagnosable mental illness, should be the key consideration for compulsory mental health treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Current legislative provisions for compulsory treatment of people with mental illness allow decisions to treat people under compulsion to be made on the basis of presence of a mental illness or mental disorder without consideration of whether the patient has the capacity to make decisions that are in his/her best interest. Issues of autonomy, equity, justice and beneficence in relation to treatment of people with mental illness are explored to determine decision-making rules that should be applied for compulsory mental health treatment. CONCLUSIONS: It is proposed that assessment of the capacity of the individual to make decisions in his/her best interest, rather than presence of diagnosable mental illness, should be the key consideration for compulsory mental health treatment.
Authors: Luca Pingani; Sara Catellani; Valeria Del Vecchio; Gaia Sampogna; Sarah E Ellefson; Marco Rigatelli; Andrea Fiorillo; Sara Evans-Lacko; Patrick W Corrigan Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 3.630