Literature DB >> 23099437

The HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation is not associated with the risk of breast cancer.

Mohammad R Akbari1, Wojciech Kluźniak, Rachelle Rodin, Song Li, Dominika Wokołorczyk, Robert Royer, Aniruddh Kashyap, Janusz Menkiszak, Jan Lubinski, Steven A Narod, Cezary Cybulski.   

Abstract

Recently, the HOXB13 gene has been shown to be a susceptibility gene for prostate cancer. HOXB13 is overexpressed in breast cancer tissues and HOXB13 expression in combination with low expression of IL17BR is predictive for a tamoxifen response in ER-positive breast cancers. Based on observations, we hypothesized that the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation might be associated with breast cancer risk. We genotyped this mutation in the germline DNA of 4,037 women with breast cancer (including 1,082 familial cases) and in 2,762 controls from Canada and Poland. Seven heterozygous carriers of the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation were found in the cases (0.17 %) compared to four carriers among the controls (0.14 %; OR = 1.2, 95 % CI = 0.34-4.1, p = 1.0). Only one of the seven carriers had a family history of breast cancer. This study does not support the hypothesis that women who carry the HOXB13 Gly84Glu mutation are at increased risk of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23099437      PMCID: PMC3511696          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2295-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


Introduction

The risk of breast cancer varies between women, and genetic susceptibility plays an important role in the etiology of the disease. Two major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 [1] and BRCA2 [2], were identified in the 1990s. Hereditary breast cancer cases are estimated to account for 10 % of all breast cancers and BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for only 15–20 % of the inherited breast cancers [3]. More recently, other breast cancer genes such as BRIP1 [4], CHEK2 [5], and PALB2 [6] have been discovered, but mutations in those genes are rare and account for only a small percentage of families. Recently, the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation was reported to be associated with the increased risk of prostate cancer [7]. This mutation increases the risk of prostate cancer by 5- to 10-fold [8, 9]. HOXB13 belongs to the HOX family of transcription factor genes, each containing a homeodomain. These genes are located in four clusters throughout the human genome (HOXA, B, C, and D) and are involved in embryonic development [10], but they are also expressed in different organs in the adult, including breast tissue [11]. HOXB13 is overexpressed in breast cancers compared to the normal breast [12, 13], and high expression of HOXB13 in combination with low expression of IL17BR has been reported to be predictive of a poor response to tamoxifen therapy in ER-positive breast cancer patients [14, 15]. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation might be associated with breast cancer risk.

Methods

We genotyped the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation in germline DNA of 4,037 breast cancer cases and in 2,762 controls. Subjects included 1,804 breast cancer cases and 925 controls from Canada and 2,233 breast cancer cases and 1,837 controls from Poland. The Canadian cases were all white women and were selected from patients who received genetic counseling at the cancer genetics clinics in Toronto between 1998 and 2011. The mean age at diagnosis of these patients was 52.2 years (range 18–89). The Polish cases include prospectively ascertained series of invasive breast cancer diagnosed throughout Poland with early onset breast cancer (age range 20–50; mean 44.4). They were ascertained from 18 different hospitals between 1996 and 2003. Of the total 4,037 breast cancer cases, 1,085 patients had at least one affected individual among their first-degree relatives (familial cases). Canadian controls were obtained from the Healthwatch (HW) screening program at the Women’s College hospital. These are healthy women with no prior history of cancer who had attended a multimodal screening clinic for well women at the Women’s College Hospital in Toronto. The Polish controls consisted of 1,837 unselected cancer-free women (age range 24–84 years; mean age 54.0 years), selected at random from the computerized patient lists of five large family practices located in the region of Szczecin in 2003. Cases and controls were restricted to women of European origin as previous studies in prostate cancer [7, 8] found the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation only among men of European decent. The study was approved by the ethics review board of the participating institutions. Genotyping of the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation among cases and controls was performed using the TaqMan assay on ABI 7500 fast and 7900 real-time systems (Applied Biosystems Co., Foster City, CA, USA). All mutation carriers identified by genotyping were confirmed by direct sequencing using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit on an ABI 3500XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Co., Foster City, CA, USA). We compared the frequency of the HOXB13p.Gly84Glu mutation between cases and controls using Fisher’s exact test and calculated odds ratios (OR) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) based on 2 × 2 table analysis of the cases and controls. All statistical tests were two-sided and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The detailed clinical characteristics of the cases and controls carrying the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation are shown in Table 1. Seven heterozygous carriers of the HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation were identified among the 4,037 cases (0.17 %) and four carriers were seen among the 2,762 controls (0.14 %) (OR = 1.2, 95 % CI = 0.3–4.1, p = 1.0). Only one of the seven carrier cases had a first-degree relative with breast cancer, and after limiting the comparison to familial cases, still no association was seen between HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu and breast cancer (OR = 0.6, 95 % CI = 0.1–5.7, p = 0.9).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of 11 individuals carrying germline HOXB13 G84E mutation

No.OriginSubjectsAge at diagnosis, yEstrogen receptorProgesterone receptorHER2GradeFamily historyb
1CanadaCase78++?Ca ductal G3None
2CanadaCase74++Ca ductal G2Father (PrCa), maternal aunt (BrCa)
3PolandCase50a +++Ca ductal GxNone
4PolandCase50Ca ductal G3None
5PolandCase47+?Ca ductal G1, G2Mother (BrCa), paternal aunt (BrCa)
6PolandCase47+Ca ductal G1, G2Father (PrCa), paternal grandfather (PrCa)
7PolandCase41+Ca medullarNone
8CanadaControl57NANANANANone
9PolandControl50NANANANANone
10PolandControl70NANANANANone
11PolandControl40NANANANANone

aPoland cases were selected for their age and they were all under 50 years of age

bFamily history of breast cancer (BrCa) and prostate cancer (PrCa) among the first-and second-degree relatives of the probands

(+) or (++) positive; (–) negative; ? unknown; NA not available; HER2 Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2

Clinical characteristics of 11 individuals carrying germline HOXB13 G84E mutation aPoland cases were selected for their age and they were all under 50 years of age bFamily history of breast cancer (BrCa) and prostate cancer (PrCa) among the first-and second-degree relatives of the probands (+) or (++) positive; (–) negative; ? unknown; NA not available; HER2 Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2

Discussion

The association of HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu and increased risk of prostate cancer has been confirmed in several large scale case–control studies [8-10]. In a follow-up study, Alanee et al. reported that [16] this mutation was also associated with an increased risk of familial breast cancer (OR = 5.7, 95 % CI: 1.0–40.7, p = 0.02). The authors found that, among study subjects with familial breast cancer who were negative for BRCA1/2 mutations, the carrier frequency of p.Gly84Glu (0.7 %) was seven times higher than in their control group (0.1 %). This study was based on 877 familial cases, out of which 6 had a mutation. In our much larger series of familial and non-familial cases, we observed similar frequencies between all cases and controls (0.17 and 0.14 % respectively) and even lower frequency (0.09 %) was seen among familial cases and we did not confirm the association between HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu and increased risk of breast cancer. However, the HOXB13 p.Gly48Glu allele is very rare (approximately one in a thousand) and we are unable to rule out a small effect. The relatively high expression level of HOXB13 in breast tumor cells compared to normal breast cells [12-15] suggests a possible oncogenic role for HOXB13, although activating mutations have not been reported. However, the prostate cancer studies are unable to distinguish between an oncogenic or tumor suppressor effect for HOXB13 [17], given that it is not known if the p.Gly84Glu mutation leads to loss or gain of function and truncating variants which are suggestive of a tumor suppressor effect have not been seen [7].
  16 in total

1.  Association between germline HOXB13 G84E mutation and risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad R Akbari; John Trachtenberg; Justin Lee; Stephanie Tam; Robert Bristow; Andrew Loblaw; Steven A Narod; Robert K Nam
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Developmental patterning. The Hox code out on a limb.

Authors:  A Graham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Confirmation of the HOXB13 G84E germline mutation in familial prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joan P Breyer; T Grant Avritt; Kate M McReynolds; William D Dupont; Jeffrey R Smith
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  HOXB13-to-IL17BR expression ratio is related with tumor aggressiveness and response to tamoxifen of recurrent breast cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Maurice P H M Jansen; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Maxime P Look; Kirsten Ritstier; Marion E Meijer-van Gelder; Iris L van Staveren; Jan G M Klijn; John A Foekens; Els M J J Berns
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  HOXB13 induces growth suppression of prostate cancer cells as a repressor of hormone-activated androgen receptor signaling.

Authors:  Chaeyong Jung; Ran-Sook Kim; Hong-Ji Zhang; Sang-Jin Lee; Meei-Huey Jeng
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Ans van den Ouweland; Jan Klijn; Marijke Wasielewski; Anja de Snoo; Rogier Oldenburg; Antoinette Hollestelle; Mark Houben; Ellen Crepin; Monique van Veghel-Plandsoen; Fons Elstrodt; Cornelia van Duijn; Carina Bartels; Carel Meijers; Mieke Schutte; Lesley McGuffog; Deborah Thompson; Douglas Easton; Nayanta Sodha; Sheila Seal; Rita Barfoot; Jon Mangion; Jenny Chang-Claude; Diana Eccles; Rosalind Eeles; D Gareth Evans; Richard Houlston; Victoria Murday; Steven Narod; Tamara Peretz; Julian Peto; Catherine Phelan; Hong Xiang Zhang; Csilla Szabo; Peter Devilee; David Goldgar; P Andrew Futreal; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara Weber; Nazneen Rahman; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1.

Authors:  Y Miki; J Swensen; D Shattuck-Eidens; P A Futreal; K Harshman; S Tavtigian; Q Liu; C Cochran; L M Bennett; W Ding
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A two-gene expression ratio predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Ma; Zuncai Wang; Paula D Ryan; Steven J Isakoff; Anne Barmettler; Andrew Fuller; Beth Muir; Gayatry Mohapatra; Ranelle Salunga; J Todd Tuggle; Yen Tran; Diem Tran; Ana Tassin; Paul Amon; Wilson Wang; Wei Wang; Edward Enright; Kimberly Stecker; Eden Estepa-Sabal; Barbara Smith; Jerry Younger; Ulysses Balis; James Michaelson; Atul Bhan; Karleen Habin; Thomas M Baer; Joan Brugge; Daniel A Haber; Mark G Erlander; Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Association of a HOXB13 variant with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shaheen Alanee; Fergus Couch; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  In vivo expression of the whole HOX gene network in human breast cancer.

Authors:  M Cantile; G Pettinato; A Procino; I Feliciello; L Cindolo; C Cillo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  6 in total

1.  The HOXB13 G84E Mutation Is Associated with an Increased Risk for Prostate Cancer and Other Malignancies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Matthew Hathcock; Cecilia Yee; Linda A Okoth; Charles M Ewing; William B Isaacs; Kathleen A Cooney; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Prevalence of the HOXB13 G84E prostate cancer risk allele in men treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; William B Isaacs; Kimberly A Zuhlke; Cecilia Yee; Patrick C Walsh; Sarah D Isaacs; Anna M Johnson; Charles E Ewing; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Wasim H Chowdhury; James E Montie; Kathleen A Cooney
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Identification of Two Novel HOXB13 Germline Mutations in Portuguese Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sofia Maia; Marta Cardoso; Pedro Pinto; Manuela Pinheiro; Catarina Santos; Ana Peixoto; Maria José Bento; Jorge Oliveira; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Germline HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation and cancer susceptibility: a pooled analysis of 25 epidemiological studies with 145,257 participates.

Authors:  Qiliang Cai; Xinpeng Wang; Xiaodong Li; Rui Gong; Xuemei Guo; Yang Tang; Kuo Yang; Yuanjie Niu; Yan Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-12-08

5.  Recurrent HOXB13 mutations in the Dutch population do not associate with increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jingjing Liu; Wendy J C Prager-van der Smissen; Marjanka K Schmidt; J Margriet Collée; Sten Cornelissen; Roy Lamping; Anja Nieuwlaat; John A Foekens; Maartje J Hooning; Senno Verhoef; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Frans B L Hogervorst; John W M Martens; Antoinette Hollestelle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Germline HOXB13 mutations p.G84E and p.R217C do not confer an increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jingjing Liu; Wendy J C Prager-van der Smissen; J Margriet Collée; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Kyriaki Michailidou; Joe Dennis; Thomas U Ahearn; Kristiina Aittomäki; Christine B Ambrosone; Irene L Andrulis; Hoda Anton-Culver; Natalia N Antonenkova; Volker Arndt; Norbert Arnold; Kristan J Aronson; Annelie Augustinsson; Päivi Auvinen; Heiko Becher; Matthias W Beckmann; Sabine Behrens; Marina Bermisheva; Leslie Bernstein; Natalia V Bogdanova; Nadja Bogdanova-Markov; Stig E Bojesen; Hiltrud Brauch; Hermann Brenner; Ignacio Briceno; Sara Y Brucker; Thomas Brüning; Barbara Burwinkel; Qiuyin Cai; Hui Cai; Daniele Campa; Federico Canzian; Jose E Castelao; Jenny Chang-Claude; Stephen J Chanock; Ji-Yeob Choi; Melissa Christiaens; Christine L Clarke; Fergus J Couch; Kamila Czene; Mary B Daly; Peter Devilee; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Miriam Dwek; Diana M Eccles; A Heather Eliassen; Peter A Fasching; Jonine Figueroa; Henrik Flyger; Lin Fritschi; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Susan M Gapstur; Montserrat García-Closas; José A García-Sáenz; Mia M Gaudet; Graham G Giles; Mark S Goldberg; David E Goldgar; Pascal Guénel; Christopher A Haiman; Niclas Håkansson; Per Hall; Patricia A Harrington; Steven N Hart; Mikael Hartman; Peter Hillemanns; John L Hopper; Ming-Feng Hou; David J Hunter; Dezheng Huo; Hidemi Ito; Motoki Iwasaki; Milena Jakimovska; Anna Jakubowska; Esther M John; Rudolf Kaaks; Daehee Kang; Renske Keeman; Elza Khusnutdinova; Sung-Won Kim; Peter Kraft; Vessela N Kristensen; Allison W Kurian; Loic Le Marchand; Jingmei Li; Annika Lindblom; Artitaya Lophatananon; Robert N Luben; Jan Lubiński; Arto Mannermaa; Mehdi Manoochehri; Siranoush Manoukian; Sara Margolin; Shivaani Mariapun; Keitaro Matsuo; Tabea Maurer; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Alfons Meindl; Usha Menon; Roger L Milne; Kenneth Muir; Anna Marie Mulligan; Susan L Neuhausen; Heli Nevanlinna; Kenneth Offit; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Janet E Olson; Håkan Olsson; Nick Orr; Sue K Park; Paolo Peterlongo; Julian Peto; Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska; Nadege Presneau; Brigitte Rack; Rohini Rau-Murthy; Gad Rennert; Hedy S Rennert; Valerie Rhenius; Atocha Romero; Matthias Ruebner; Emmanouil Saloustros; Rita K Schmutzler; Andreas Schneeweiss; Christopher Scott; Mitul Shah; Chen-Yang Shen; Xiao-Ou Shu; Jacques Simard; Christof Sohn; Melissa C Southey; John J Spinelli; Rulla M Tamimi; William J Tapper; Soo H Teo; Mary Beth Terry; Diana Torres; Thérèse Truong; Michael Untch; Celine M Vachon; Christi J van Asperen; Alicja Wolk; Taiki Yamaji; Wei Zheng; Argyrios Ziogas; Elad Ziv; Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Thilo Dörk; Anthony J Swerdlow; Ute Hamann; Marjanka K Schmidt; Alison M Dunning; Paul D P Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Maartje J Hooning; John W M Martens; Antoinette Hollestelle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.