Literature DB >> 23099425

Epidemiology of a mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated island population and use of a third dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine for outbreak control--Guam 2009 to 2010.

George E Nelson1, Annette Aguon, Engracia Valencia, Rita Oliva, Michele Leon Guerrero, Richard Reyes, Anna Lizama, Daryl Diras, Annakutty Mathew, E Jessica Camacho, Moryne-Nicole Monforte, Tai-Ho Chen, Abdirahman Mahamud, Preeta K Kutty, Carole Hickman, William J Bellini, Jane F Seward, Kathleen Gallagher, Amy Parker Fiebelkorn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite high 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage, a large mumps outbreak occurred on the US Territory of Guam during 2009 to 2010, primarily in school-aged children.
METHODS: We implemented active surveillance in April 2010 during the outbreak peak and characterized the outbreak epidemiology. We administered third doses of MMR vaccine to eligible students aged 9-14 years in 7 schools with the highest attack rates (ARs) between May 18, 2010, and May 21, 2010. Baseline surveys, follow-up surveys and case-reports were used to determine mumps ARs. Adverse events postvaccination were monitored.
RESULTS: Between December 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, 505 mumps cases were reported. Self-reported Pohnpeians and Chuukese had the highest relative risks (54.7 and 19.7, respectively) and highest crowding indices (mean: 3.1 and 3.0 persons/bedroom, respectively). Among 287 (57%) school-aged case-patients, 270 (93%) had ≥2 MMR doses. A third MMR dose was administered to 1068 (33%) eligible students. Three-dose vaccinated students had an AR of 0.9/1000 compared with 2.4/1000 among students vaccinated with ≤2 doses >1 incubation period postintervention, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.67). No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: This mumps outbreak occurred in a highly vaccinated population. The highest ARs occurred in ethnic minority populations with the highest household crowding indices. After the third dose MMR intervention in highly affected schools, 3-dose recipients had an AR 60% lower than students with ≤2 doses, but the difference was not statistically significant and the intervention occurred after the outbreak peaked. This outbreak may have persisted due to crowding at home and high student contact rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23099425      PMCID: PMC6893844          DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318279f593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  27 in total

1.  Observations on a mumps epidemic in a virgin population.

Authors:  R N PHILIP; K R REINHARD; D B LACKMAN
Journal:  Am J Hyg       Date:  1959-03

2.  Ongoing mumps outbreak in a student population with high vaccination coverage, Netherlands, 2010.

Authors:  J Whelan; R van Binnendijk; K Greenland; E Fanoy; M Khargi; K Yap; H Boot; N Veltman; C Swaan; A van der Bij; H de Melker; S Hahné
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2010-04-29

3.  Notice to readers: updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the control and elimination of mumps.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Mumps outbreak in Israel's highly vaccinated society: are two doses enough?

Authors:  E Anis; I Grotto; L Moerman; B Warshavsky; P E Slater; B Lev
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  A retrospective survey of the complications of mumps.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1974-08

6.  Mumps orchitis in a 3-year-old child.

Authors:  J E Atkinson; H N Bass
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-03-04       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The effect of a school entry law on mumps activity in a school district.

Authors:  B P Chaiken; N M Williams; S R Preblud; W Parkin; R Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Proposal for genetic characterisation of wild-type mumps strains: preliminary standardisation of the nomenclature.

Authors:  L Jin; B Rima; D Brown; C Orvell; T Tecle; M Afzal; K Uchida; T Nakayama; J-W Song; C Kang; P A Rota; W Xu; D Featherstone
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.574

9.  Clinical appearance and outcome in mumps encephalitis in children.

Authors:  M Koskiniemi; M Donner; O Pettay
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1983-07

10.  Long-term persistence of mumps antibody after receipt of 2 measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations and antibody response after a third MMR vaccination among a university population.

Authors:  Anand A Date; Moe H Kyaw; Alison M Rue; Julie Klahn; Leann Obrecht; Terry Krohn; Josh Rowland; Steve Rubin; Thomas J Safranek; William J Bellini; Gustavo H Dayan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 7.759

View more
  35 in total

1.  Estimates of mumps seroprevalence may be influenced by antibody specificity and serologic method.

Authors:  Donald R Latner; Marcia McGrew; Nobia J Williams; Sun B Sowers; William J Bellini; Carole J Hickman
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-12-26

2.  The association between the incidence of mumps and meteorological parameters in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Chien Ho; Bo-Hua Su; Huey-Jen Su; Hsiao-Ling Chang; Chuan-Yao Lin; Huifen Chen; Kow-Tong Chen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Outbreak of mumps in a school setting, United Kingdom, 2013.

Authors:  Erlend T Aasheim; Thomas Inns; Amy Trindall; Lynsey Emmett; Kevin E Brown; Chris J Williams; Mark Reacher
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Mumps: an Update on Outbreaks, Vaccine Efficacy, and Genomic Diversity.

Authors:  Eugene Lam; Jennifer B Rosen; Jane R Zucker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Effectiveness of a Third Dose of MMR Vaccine for Mumps Outbreak Control.

Authors:  Cristina V Cardemil; Rebecca M Dahl; Lisa James; Kathleen Wannemuehler; Howard E Gary; Minesh Shah; Mona Marin; Jacob Riley; Daniel R Feikin; Manisha Patel; Patricia Quinlisk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Seroepidemiology of mumps in the general population of Jiangsu province, China after introduction of a one-dose measles-mumps-rubella vaccine.

Authors:  Yuanbao Liu; Ying Hu; Xiuying Deng; Zhiguo Wang; Peishan Lu; Fubao Ma; Minghao Zhou; Pei Liu; Jie Min
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Vaccine waning and mumps re-emergence in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph A Lewnard; Yonatan H Grad
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Epidemiologic features of mumps in Taiwan from 2006 to 2011: a new challenge for public health policy.

Authors:  Chian-Ching Chen; Chien-Chih Lu; Bo-Hua Su; Kow-Tong Chen
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.764

9.  Measles Virus Neutralizing Antibody Response, Cell-Mediated Immunity, and Immunoglobulin G Antibody Avidity Before and After Receipt of a Third Dose of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine in Young Adults.

Authors:  Amy Parker Fiebelkorn; Laura A Coleman; Edward A Belongia; Sandra K Freeman; Daphne York; Daoling Bi; Ashwin Kulkarni; Susette Audet; Sara Mercader; Marcia McGrew; Carole J Hickman; William J Bellini; Rupak Shivakoti; Diane E Griffin; Judith Beeler
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Seroprevalence and Determinants Associated with Mumps Antibodies after 20 Years of MMR Vaccination in Urban Area of Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Hong Pang; Yibiao Zhou; Wensui Zhao; Qingwu Jiang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.