Literature DB >> 23099039

Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

U O Gustafsson1, M J Scott, W Schwenk, N Demartines, D Roulin, N Francis, C E McNaught, J MacFie, A S Liberman, M Soop, A Hill, R H Kennedy, D N Lobo, K Fearon, O Ljungqvist.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colonic surgery and to provide graded recommendations for items for an evidenced-based enhanced perioperative protocol.
METHODS: Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature was examined, reviewed and graded. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group.
RESULTS: For most of the protocol items, recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials (quality of evidence and recommendations according to the GRADE system).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative-care pathway, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) present a comprehensive evidence-based consensus review of perioperative care for colonic surgery.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23099039     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  172 in total

1.  Factors associated with failure of enhanced recovery programs after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Heung-Kwon Oh; Myong Hun Ihn; Il Tae Son; Jin Taek Park; Jaebong Lee; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A phase II study of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norihiko Sugisawa; Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Yuichiro Miki; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Hughes; Nicholas T Ventham; Ewen M Harrison; Stephen J Wigmore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery Reduced Postoperative Pain and Unplanned Returns to Care After Discharge.

Authors:  Aaron B Parrish; Sean M O'Neill; Steven R Crain; Tara A Russell; Deepak K Sonthalia; Vu T Nguyen; Armen Aboulian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Role of regional anesthesia in the enhanced recovery after surgery program.

Authors:  Masato Kitayama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  The earlier the better?

Authors:  Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Limited preoperative physical capacity continues to be associated with poor postoperative outcomes within a colorectal ERAS programme.

Authors:  E McLennan; R Oliphant; S J Moug
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  Optimising organ perfusion in the high-risk surgical and critical care patient: a narrative review.

Authors:  Thomas Parker; David Brealey; Alex Dyson; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 9.  Interventions to optimize recovery after laparoscopic appendectomy: a scoping review.

Authors:  James K Hamill; Jamie-Lee Rahiri; Gamage Gunaratna; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The perioperative surgical home (PSH): a comprehensive review of US and non-US studies shows predominantly positive quality and cost outcomes.

Authors:  Bita A Kash; Yichen Zhang; Kayla M Cline; Terri Menser; Thomas R Miller
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.