Literature DB >> 23098762

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 dose-ranging study of onabotulinumtoxinA in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Michael Marberger1, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler, Blair Egerdie, Kyu-Sung Lee, Joachim Grosse, Denise Bugarin, Jihao Zhou, Anand Patel, Cornelia Haag-Molkenteller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin treatment has been investigated as a minimally invasive alternative to oral medications in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH).
OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U, 200 U, and 300 U versus placebo in men with LUTS/BPH in a phase 2 dose-ranging study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled 72-wk study enrolled men ≥ 50 yr of age with LUTS/BPH, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 12, total prostate volume (TPV) 30-100ml, and maximum flow rate (Q(max)) 5-15 ml/s. INTERVENTION: Single transperineal (n=63) or transrectal (n=311) administration of placebo (n=94) or onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (n=95), 200 U (n=94), or 300 U (n=97) into the prostate transition zone. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary efficacy end point was a change from baseline in IPSS at week 12. Secondary end points were Q(max), TPV, and transition zone volume (TZV). Analysis of covariance and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method assessed the efficacy and proportion of IPSS responders. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Significant improvements from baseline in IPSS, Q(max), TPV, and TZV were observed for all groups, including placebo, at week 12 (p<0.001), with no significant differences between onabotulinumtoxinA and placebo. However, in an exploratory post hoc analysis, a significant reduction in IPSS versus placebo was observed with onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U in prior α-blocker users (n=180) at week 12. AEs were comparable across all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in LUTS/BPH symptoms were seen in all groups, including placebo, with no significant between-group differences owing to a large placebo effect from the injectable therapy. The findings from the post hoc analysis in men previously treated with α-blockers will be further explored in an appropriately designed study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.Clinical Trials.gov; NCT00284518.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23098762     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  31 in total

Review 1.  Placebo Medication and Sham Surgery Responses in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments: Implications for Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Adam Schatz; Charles Welliver
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  [S2e guideline of the German urologists: Instrumental treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; T Bach; R Berges; K Dreikorn; C Gratzke; S Madersbacher; M-S Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; C Tschuschke; K Höfner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Intraprostatic injection therapy in patients with benign prostatic syndrome].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; T Bach; C Gratzke; S Madersbacher; M Oelke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  BPH in 2012: novel agents in treatment of BPH.

Authors:  Bilal Chughtai; Alexis Te
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Botulinum toxin-what urologic uses does the data support?

Authors:  J Seth; M S Khan; P Dasgupta; A Sahai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  [Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  G Magistro; C G Stief; C Gratzke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Effect of Onabotulinum Toxin A on Substance P and Receptor Neurokinin 1 in the Rat Ventral Prostate.

Authors:  Omer Onur Cakir; Carol A Podlasek; Douglas Wood; Kevin E McKenna; Kevin T McVary
Journal:  Andrology (Los Angel)       Date:  2015-03-28

8.  Prostatic injection of botulinum toxin is not inferior to optimized medical therapy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Grégoire Robert; Aurélien Descazeaud; Gilles Karsenty; Christian Saussine; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Alexandre de la Taille; François Desgrandchamps; Antoine Faix; Marc Fourmarier; Aurore Georget; Antoine Benard; Nicolas Barry Delongchamps
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Current and potential urological applications of botulinum toxin A.

Authors:  Yuan-Hong Jiang; Chun-Hou Liao; Hann-Chorng Kuo
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin injection for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sung Ryul Shim; Young Joo Cho; In-Soo Shin; Jae Heon Kim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.