BACKGROUND: Pre-session administration of d-cycloserine (DCS) has been found to augment exposure therapy outcomes in a variety of anxiety disorders. To be able to enhance learning only for successful exposure sessions, it would be beneficial to have the option of administering DCS after rather than before the session, a strategy encouraged by pre-clinical work. We believe the present study is the first published report on the efficacy of post-session administration of DCS in humans. METHOD: Adults (N = 29) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of acrophobia were randomized to receive two sessions of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRE) in combination with placebo or 50 mg of DCS. Instead of administering the pill prior to each of the sessions, as has been done in extant work, we administered the pill immediately following each session. Measures of acrophobia severity were collected at baseline, at each treatment session, 1-week post-treatment, and at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mixed-effects repeated-measures ANOVAs and GLMMs revealed significant improvement in all outcome measures over time, but no between-group differences were observed. At post-treatment, 63.5% of patients in the placebo condition vs. 60.0% of those in the DCS condition were in remission. At 1-month follow up, 63.4% of those in the placebo condition vs. 66.6% of those in the DCS condition were in remission. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the application of post-session DCS administration for augmenting the efficacy of exposure-based treatments. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRY: The Trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01102803).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Pre-session administration of d-cycloserine (DCS) has been found to augment exposure therapy outcomes in a variety of anxiety disorders. To be able to enhance learning only for successful exposure sessions, it would be beneficial to have the option of administering DCS after rather than before the session, a strategy encouraged by pre-clinical work. We believe the present study is the first published report on the efficacy of post-session administration of DCS in humans. METHOD: Adults (N = 29) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of acrophobia were randomized to receive two sessions of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRE) in combination with placebo or 50 mg of DCS. Instead of administering the pill prior to each of the sessions, as has been done in extant work, we administered the pill immediately following each session. Measures of acrophobia severity were collected at baseline, at each treatment session, 1-week post-treatment, and at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mixed-effects repeated-measures ANOVAs and GLMMs revealed significant improvement in all outcome measures over time, but no between-group differences were observed. At post-treatment, 63.5% of patients in the placebo condition vs. 60.0% of those in the DCS condition were in remission. At 1-month follow up, 63.4% of those in the placebo condition vs. 66.6% of those in the DCS condition were in remission. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the application of post-session DCS administration for augmenting the efficacy of exposure-based treatments. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRY: The Trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01102803).
Authors: Adam J Guastella; Mark R Dadds; Peter F Lovibond; Philip Mitchell; Rick Richardson Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2006-07-10 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Kerry J Ressler; Barbara O Rothbaum; Libby Tannenbaum; Page Anderson; Ken Graap; Elana Zimand; Larry Hodges; Michael Davis Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2004-11
Authors: Matt G Kushner; Suck Won Kim; Christopher Donahue; Paul Thuras; David Adson; Michael Kotlyar; James McCabe; Jillian Peterson; Edna B Foa Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-06-22 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Michael W Otto; M Alexandra Kredlow; Jasper A J Smits; Stefan G Hofmann; David F Tolin; Rianne A de Kleine; Agnes van Minnen; A Eden Evins; Mark H Pollack Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Mark B Powers; Johnna L Medina; Stephanie Burns; Brooke Y Kauffman; Marie Monfils; Gordon J G Asmundson; Allison Diamond; Christa McIntyre; Jasper A J Smits Journal: Cogn Behav Ther Date: 2015-02-23
Authors: Jasper A J Smits; David Rosenfield; Michael W Otto; Mark B Powers; Stefan G Hofmann; Michael J Telch; Mark H Pollack; Candyce D Tart Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jasper A J Smits; David Rosenfield; Michael W Otto; Luana Marques; Michelle L Davis; Alicia E Meuret; Naomi M Simon; Mark H Pollack; Stefan G Hofmann Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Michael J Telch; Aleksandra K Bruchey; David Rosenfield; Adam R Cobb; Jasper Smits; Sandra Pahl; F Gonzalez-Lima Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 18.112