Literature DB >> 23098616

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: adverse events reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.

Emily Jane Woo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adverse effects of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in spinal surgery have previously been observed. However, because of its size, scope, and nature, the US Food and Drug Administration's database of postmarketing reports is useful for detecting new and unexpected safety concerns.
PURPOSE: To characterize adverse events reported to the FDA; to characterize off-label use of rhBMP-2. STUDY
DESIGN: Review of adverse events reported to the FDA after the use of rhBMP-2 (INFUSE Bone Graft) in spinal surgery.
METHODS: The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was searched for the brand name "infuse bone graft," for reports received from July 2, 2002, through August 31, 2011. Adverse events were reviewed, summarized, and classified by an MD. For each report, the most important clinical entity was identified as the principal adverse event. Off-label uses were summarized.
RESULTS: Of 834 reports, four (0.5%) described procedures in which rhBMP-2 was used in accordance with the approved indication. Nearly half of all the reports, 370 (44.4%), stated that the patient required revision surgery or other invasive interventions to address the reported adverse event. Swelling, fluid collections, osteolysis, pain/radiculopathy, heterotopic bone, pseudarthrosis, surgical site infections and other wound complications, thromboembolic events, respiratory distress, cancer, and other events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of their duration, scope, and expense, prospective studies designed to estimate the risk of rare adverse events may be impractical. Despite its imperfections, postmarketing surveillance helps to narrow the focus by revealing patterns and prioritizing topics for further research. One should not extrapolate from these results to the rhBMP-2 experience as a whole; the findings reported here might not be representative. This analysis indicates that serious adverse events can occur after the use of rhBMP-2 in spinal surgery and raises many points that surgeons may wish to consider when deciding when and how to use this product in their patients. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23098616     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.09.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  33 in total

Review 1.  The potential impact of bone tissue engineering in the clinic.

Authors:  Ruchi Mishra; Tyler Bishop; Ian L Valerio; John P Fisher; David Dean
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  Enhancement of MicroRNA-200c on Osteogenic Differentiation and Bone Regeneration by Targeting Sox2-Mediated Wnt Signaling and Klf4.

Authors:  Adil Akkouch; Steven Eliason; Mason E Sweat; Miguel Romero-Bustillos; Min Zhu; Fang Qian; Brad A Amendt; Liu Hong
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.695

3.  Comparison of a calcium phosphate bone substitute with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of fusion rates, clinical outcomes and complications with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Rhiannon M Parker; Gregory M Malham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effectiveness and Feasibility of Injectable Escherichia coli-Derived Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the Lumbosacral Junction in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Clinical Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sang-Kyu Im; Jung-Hee Lee; Ki Young Lee; Seung-Jin Yoo
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Complications, revision fusions, readmissions, and utilization over a 1-year period after bone morphogenetic protein use during primary cervical spine fusions.

Authors:  Adam P Goode; William J Richardson; Robin M Schectman; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Value of single-level circumferential fusion: a 10-year prospective outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis comparing posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Glenn Buttermann; Sarah Hollmann; John-Michael Arpino; Nicole Ferko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Delivery of S1P receptor-targeted drugs via biodegradable polymer scaffolds enhances bone regeneration in a critical size cranial defect.

Authors:  Anusuya Das; Shaun Tanner; Daniel A Barker; David Green; Edward A Botchwey
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Forces associated with launch into space do not impact bone fracture healing.

Authors:  Paul Childress; Alexander Brinker; Cynthia-May S Gong; Jonathan Harris; David J Olivos; Jeffrey D Rytlewski; David C Scofield; Sungshin Y Choi; Yasaman Shirazi-Fard; Todd O McKinley; Tien-Min G Chu; Carolynn L Conley; Nabarun Chakraborty; Rasha Hammamieh; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2017-11-11

9.  Controversy of physiological vs. pharmacological effects of BMP signaling: Constitutive activation of BMP type IA receptor-dependent signaling in osteoblast lineage enhances bone formation and resorption, not affecting net bone mass.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Kamiya; Phimon Atsawasuwan; Danese M Joiner; Erik I Waldorff; Steve Goldstein; Mitsuo Yamauchi; Yuji Mishina
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Semaphorin 3A promotes the osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in inflammatory environments by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Authors:  Zhaoze Sun; Kaixian Yan; Shuang Liu; Xijiao Yu; Jingyi Xu; Jinhua Liu; Shu Li
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.