Literature DB >> 23098281

Toxicity and outcome of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a matched-pair analysis.

Abrahim Al-Mamgani1, Peter Van Rooij, Lisa Tans, David N Teguh, Peter C Levendag.   

Abstract

Because of the scarcity of randomized trials comparing toxicity and outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), we performed a matched-pair analysis from prospectively collected data from the Head and Neck Tumor Registry of our institution. In the absence of phase III trials, we believe this approach provides the highest quality data possible. Ninety-two patients treated with 3DCRT were matched (1:1) to 92 patients treated with IMRT for 9 potential predictive factors for toxicity and outcome: gender, age, T-stage, N-stage, tumor subsite, unilateral neck irradiation, chemotherapy, neck dissection and boost technique. Groups were compared for acute and late toxicity, locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Oncologic outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and toxicity was analyzed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The overall incidence of grade 3 acute toxicity was significantly reduced by IMRT, compared to 3DCRT (45% vs. 70%, p = 0.001). The need for tube feeding was reduced from 50% to 37% (p = 0.04). The 3-year actuarial incidence of grade ≥2 late toxicity was also significantly reduced by IMRT, compared to 3DCRT (20% vs. 45%, respectively; p ≤ 0.0001). The incidence of grade ≥ 2 late dysphagia and xerostomia for IMRT vs. 3DCRT were 10% vs. 31% for dysphagia, p = 0.004 and 13% vs. 37%, for xerostomia, respectively (p = 0.001). The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of LRC, DFS, and OS for IMRT vs. 3DCRT were 90% vs. 82% (p = 0.1), 82% vs. 76% (p = 0.3), and 72% vs. 64% (p = 0.2), respectively. In conclusion, the presented non-randomized comparative study of well-matched groups demonstrates the superiority of IMRT vs. 3DCRT for OPC by significantly reducing radiation-induced toxicity without jeopardizing outcomes. The improved therapeutic ratio achieved by the use of IMRT would allow dose escalation of radiotherapy to further improve outcomes of patients with OPC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23098281     DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  9 in total

1.  Organ sparing and clinical outcome with step-and-shoot IMRT for head and neck cancer: a mono-institutional experience.

Authors:  Rosario Mazzola; Giuseppe Ferrera; Filippo Alongi; Mariella Mannino; Boris Abbate; Teresa Cucchiara; Giuseppina Iacoviello; Francesco Sciumè; Gioacchino Di Paola; Manuela Federico; Livio Blasi; Antonio Lo Casto; Roberto Lagalla; Domenico Messana
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Dietary counselling and nutritional support in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: persistent weight loss during 1-year follow-ups.

Authors:  C P Vlooswijk; P H E van Rooij; J C Kruize; H A Schuring; A Al-Mamgani; N M de Roos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Acute hematologic and mucosal toxicities in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy: a comparison of 3D-CRT, IMRT, and helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Tim J Kruser; Stephanie R Rice; Kevin P Cleary; Heather M Geye; Wolfgang A Tome; Paul M Harari; Kevin R Kozak
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-03-26

4.  Recurrent oropharyngeal cancer after organ preserving treatment: pattern of failure and survival.

Authors:  M de Ridder; Z A R Gouw; J J Sonke; A Navran; B Jasperse; J Heukelom; M E T Tesselaar; W M C Klop; M W M van den Brekel; Abrahim Al-Mamgani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Long-term outcomes after multidisciplinary management of T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas: Improved functional outcomes and survival with modern therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Adam S Garden; G Brandon Gunn; Collin F Mulcahy; Mark Zafereo; Jack Phan; Stephen Y Lai; Jan S Lewin; Katherine A Hutcheson; Steven J Frank; Beth M Beadle; William H Morrison; Adel K El-Naggar; Esengul Kocak-Uzel; Lawrence E Ginsberg; Merril S Kies; Randal S Weber; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Beam path toxicity in candidate organs-at-risk: assessment of radiation emetogenesis for patients receiving head and neck intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Esengul Kocak-Uzel; G Brandon Gunn; Rivka R Colen; Micheal E Kantor; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Sara Schoultz-Henley; Paniyotis Mavroidis; Steven J Frank; Adam S Garden; Beth M Beadle; William H Morrison; Jack Phan; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Human papilloma virus and survival of oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Martina A Broglie; Alex Soltermann; Sarah R Haile; Gerhard F Huber; Sandro J Stoeckli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Radioprotective effect of epicatechin in cultured human fibroblasts and zebrafish.

Authors:  Hyang Ae Shin; Yoo Seob Shin; Sung Un Kang; Jang Hee Kim; Young-Taek Oh; Keun Hyung Park; Bum Hei Lee; Chul-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary: Cracking a nut with a sledgehammer?

Authors:  Diako Berzenji; Dominiek A Monserez; Gerda M Verduijn; Emilie A C Dronkers; Peter P Jansen; Stijn Keereweer; Aniel Sewnaik; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Jose A Hardillo
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.