Literature DB >> 2309781

Maternal origin of 15q11-13 deletions in Angelman syndrome suggests a role for genomic imprinting.

C A Williams1, R T Zori, J W Stone, B A Gray, E S Cantu, H Ostrer.   

Abstract

Six persons with the classical Angelman syndrome (AS) phenotype and de novo deletions of chromosome 15q11-q13 were studied to determine the parental origin of the chromosome deletion. Four of the 6 patients had informative cytogenetic studies and all demonstrated maternal inheritance of the deletion. These findings, together with other reported cases of the origin of the chromosome 15 deletion in AS, suggest that deletion of the maternally contributed chromosome leads to the AS phenotype. This contrasts with the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) in which a similar deletion of the paternally contributed chromosome 15 is observed. In deletion cases, a parental gamete effect such as genomic imprinting may be the best model to explain why apparently identical 15q11-q13 deletions may develop the different phenotypes of AS or PWS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2309781     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320350308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  38 in total

1.  Reciprocal translocation between the proximal regions of the long arms of chromosomes 13 and 15 resulting in unbalanced offspring: characterization by fluorescence in situ hybridization and DNA analysis.

Authors:  K Mangelschots; B Van Roy; F Speleman; N Van Roy; J Gheuens; J Beuten; I Buntinx; M N Van Thienen; H Willekens; J Dumon
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  The p locus is closely linked to the mouse homolog of a gene from the Prader-Willi chromosomal region.

Authors:  Y Nakatsu; Y Gondo; M H Brilliant
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Angelman syndrome with a chromosomal inversion 15 inv(p11q13) accompanied by a deletion in 15q11q13.

Authors:  T Webb; J Clayton-Smith; X J Cheng; J H Knoll; M Lalande; M E Pembrey; S Malcolm
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Paternal origin of the chromosomal deletion resulting in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome.

Authors:  O W Quarrell; R G Snell; M A Curtis; S H Roberts; P S Harper; D J Shaw
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  A boy with developmental delay and a maternally inherited deletion in 15q11q13.

Authors:  M King; C Hardy; B Asenbauer; M Kilpatrick; T Webb
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Angelman syndrome associated with an inversion of chromosome 15q11.2q24.3.

Authors:  V Greger; J H Knoll; J Wagstaff; E Woolf; P Lieske; H Glatt; P A Benn; S S Rosengren; M Lalande
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  The frequency of uniparental disomy in Prader-Willi syndrome. Implications for molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  M J Mascari; W Gottlieb; P K Rogan; M G Butler; D A Waller; J A Armour; A J Jeffreys; R L Ladda; R D Nicholls
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Multiplex PCR of three dinucleotide repeats in the Prader-Willi/Angelman critical region (15q11-q13): molecular diagnosis and mechanism of uniparental disomy.

Authors:  A Mutirangura; F Greenberg; M G Butler; S Malcolm; R D Nicholls; A Chakravarti; D H Ledbetter
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Comparison of high resolution cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and DNA studies to validate the diagnosis of Prader-Willi and Angelman's syndromes.

Authors:  A Smith; M Prasad; Z M Deng; L Robson; T Woodage; R J Trent
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Trisomy 15 with loss of the paternal 15 as a cause of Prader-Willi syndrome due to maternal disomy.

Authors:  S B Cassidy; L W Lai; R P Erickson; L Magnuson; E Thomas; R Gendron; J Herrmann
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.