Literature DB >> 23097180

Quantitative fluorescence PCR analysis of >40,000 prenatal samples for the rapid diagnosis of trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and monosomy X.

Kathy Mann1, Alison Hills, Celia Donaghue, Helen Thomas, Caroline Mackie Ogilvie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of 10 years of quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) analysis of prenatal samples for the rapid diagnosis of the common aneuploidies. This represents the largest QF-PCR data set from a single testing centre.
METHODS: QF-PCR analysis using a single assay containing 17 microsatellite markers was applied to all prenatal samples for the identification of trisomies 13, 18 and 21 and triploidy. A separate assay containing 14 sex chromosome markers was targeted to prenatal samples at increased risk of monosomy X.
RESULTS: Results from 40,624 prenatal samples comprising 14,144 chorionic villus and 26,480 amniotic fluid samples are summarised. A QF-PCR result was not possible for 2.24% amniotic fluid and 0.25% chorionic villus samples because of the presence of an additional genotype consistent with maternal cell contamination. Just 0.08% samples were uninformative for one or more chromosomes and 0.05% of samples failed to produce a genotype. Ninety-eight percent of samples were reported the following working day from sample receipt. Consumable costs were £ 5/sample.
CONCLUSION: QF-PCR analysis is proven to be an accurate, robust and efficient method for the rapid diagnosis of common aneuploidies in prenatal samples. It has the advantage of detecting triploidy and mosaicism and benefits from considerable economy of scale.
© 2012 Crown copyright.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23097180     DOI: 10.1002/pd.3986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Validation of QF-PCR for prenatal diagnoses in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  Renata Wendel de Moraes; Mario Henrique Burlacchini de Carvalho; Antonio Gomes de Amorim-Filho; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco; Renata Moscolini Romão; José Eduardo Levi; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Efficient and cost-effective genetic analysis of products of conception and fetal tissues using a QF-PCR/array CGH strategy; five years of data.

Authors:  Celia Donaghue; Nada Davies; Joo Wook Ahn; Helen Thomas; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie; Kathy Mann
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Multilevel regression modeling for aneuploidy classification and physical separation of maternal cell contamination facilitates the QF-PCR based analysis of common fetal aneuploidies.

Authors:  Predrag Noveski; Marija Terzic; Marija Vujovic; Maja Kuzmanovska; Emilija Sukarova Stefanovska; Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clinical and molecular cytogenetic findings and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with isochromosome Y.

Authors:  Yiqun He; Li Guo; Laiping Zheng; Congmian Ren; Ting Wang; Jian Lu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 5.  Microarray Technology for the Diagnosis of Fetal Chromosomal Aberrations: Which Platform Should We Use?

Authors:  Evangelia Karampetsou; Deborah Morrogh; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Discrepancy of QF-PCR, CMA and karyotyping on a de novo case of mosaic isodicentric Y chromosomes.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Li Guo; Hanbiao Chen; Jian Lu; Jingjing Hu; Xianzheng Li; Xing Li; Ting Wang; Fengzhen Li; Aihua Yin
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.009

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.