Literature DB >> 23096622

Raised intracranial pressure is frequent in untreated nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis and does not correlate with severity of phenotypic features.

Karen A Eley1, David Johnson, Andrew O M Wilkie, Jayaratnam Jayamohan, Peter Richards, Steven A Wall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a small number of children with unicoronal synostosis, the phenotype is mild and the aesthetic benefit of surgical correction is potentially outweighed by surgical risk. Raised intracranial pressure, however, would necessitate intervention. The authors documented the incidence of raised intracranial pressure in children with mild features and/or parental reluctance to proceed directly to surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all children with (1) a clinical diagnosis of nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis; (2) unicoronal synostosis confirmed on computed tomographic scanning; (3) negative family history for unicoronal synostosis; and (4) negative genetic screening (including P250R encoded by FGFR3, exons IIIa and IIIc in FGFR2 and TWIST1) was completed.
RESULTS: Of the 80 children studied, seven (9 percent) underwent formal intracranial pressure monitoring because of a combination of mild clinical features (n = 4) and/or parental reluctance to proceed with surgery (n = 3). Intracranial pressure monitoring was reported as high in three (42 percent), borderline in two (29 percent), and normal in two patients (29 percent). The findings did not correlate with the degree of clinical deformation or age at presentation. There was little correlation with clinical and radiographic features of raised intracranial pressure in this genetically screened nonsyndromic group.
CONCLUSIONS: High or borderline raised intracranial pressure was present in five of seven cases. The risk did not correlate with degree of deformity or age at presentation. Formal intracranial pressure monitoring should be considered in all children with unicoronal synostosis not proceeding directly to surgical intervention, in combination with routine long-term follow-up and repeated intracranial pressure monitoring where indicated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23096622     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267d5ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Intracranial pressure patterns in children with craniosynostosis utilizing optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jordan W Swanson; Wen Xu; Gui-Shuang Ying; Wei Pan; Shih-Shan Lang; Gregory G Heuer; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  The role of ICP overnight monitoring (ONM) in children with suspected craniostenosis.

Authors:  J Zipfel; B Jager; H Collmann; Z Czosnyka; M U Schuhmann; T Schweitzer
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution.

Authors:  Rowland H Han; Dennis C Nguyen; Brent S Bruck; Gary B Skolnick; Chester K Yarbrough; Sybill D Naidoo; Kamlesh B Patel; Alex A Kane; Albert S Woo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Evaluation of Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Children.

Authors:  Jordan W Swanson; Tomas S Aleman; Wen Xu; Gui-Shuang Ying; Wei Pan; Grant T Liu; Shih-Shan Lang; Gregory G Heuer; Phillip B Storm; Scott P Bartlett; William R Katowitz; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 5.  Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Alain Goriely; Marc G D Geers; Gerhard A Holzapfel; Jayaratnam Jayamohan; Antoine Jérusalem; Sivabal Sivaloganathan; Waney Squier; Johannes A W van Dommelen; Sarah Waters; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-02-26

6.  Practical Computed Tomography Scan Findings for Distinguishing Metopic Craniosynostosis from Metopic Ridging.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Carrie L Heike; Faisal Al-Mufarrej; Adam Oppenheimer; Shawn E Kamps; Widya Adidharma; Babette Siebold
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-03-14

7.  Gain-of-Function Mutations in ZIC1 Are Associated with Coronal Craniosynostosis and Learning Disability.

Authors:  Stephen R F Twigg; Jennifer Forecki; Jacqueline A C Goos; Ivy C A Richardson; A Jeannette M Hoogeboom; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Maarten H Lequin; Daniel Van Antwerp; Simon J McGowan; Isabelle Westbury; Kerry A Miller; Steven A Wall; Peter J van der Spek; Irene M J Mathijssen; Erwin Pauws; Christa S Merzdorf; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 11.025

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.