Literature DB >> 23094720

Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Jens Cosedis Nielsen1, Arne Johannessen, Pekka Raatikainen, Gerhard Hindricks, Håkan Walfridsson, Ole Kongstad, Steen Pehrson, Anders Englund, Juha Hartikainen, Leif Spange Mortensen, Peter Steen Hansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data comparing radiofrequency catheter ablation with antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first-line treatment in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 294 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and no history of antiarrhythmic drug use to an initial treatment strategy of either radiofrequency catheter ablation (146 patients) or therapy with class IC or class III antiarrhythmic agents (148 patients). Follow-up included 7-day Holter-monitor recording at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Primary end points were the cumulative and per-visit burden of atrial fibrillation (i.e., percentage of time in atrial fibrillation on Holter-monitor recordings). Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the ablation and drug-therapy groups in the cumulative burden of atrial fibrillation (90th percentile of arrhythmia burden, 13% and 19%, respectively; P=0.10) or the burden at 3, 6, 12, or 18 months. At 24 months, the burden of atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the ablation group than in the drug-therapy group (90th percentile, 9% vs. 18%; P=0.007), and more patients in the ablation group were free from any atrial fibrillation (85% vs. 71%, P=0.004) and from symptomatic atrial fibrillation (93% vs. 84%, P=0.01). One death in the ablation group was due to a procedure-related stroke; there were three cases of cardiac tamponade in the ablation group. In the drug-therapy group, 54 patients (36%) underwent supplementary ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: In comparing radiofrequency ablation with antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first-line treatment in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, we found no significant difference between the treatment groups in the cumulative burden of atrial fibrillation over a period of 2 years. (Funded by the Danish Heart Foundation and others; MANTRA-PAF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00133211.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23094720     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  163 in total

1.  [Studies on the energy for sperm motility (author's transl)].

Authors:  K Imamura
Journal:  Nihon Funin Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1975-10

2.  Treatment Complications of Atrial Fibrillation and Their Management.

Authors:  Allan Mattia; Joshua Newman; Frank Manetta
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-03-05

3.  Is Catheter Ablation Better Than Antiarrhythmic Drugs for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Balaji Natarajan; Srishti Nayak; Ramdas G Pai
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-03-05

Review 4.  Epicardial thoracoscopic ablation versus endocardial catheter ablation for management of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Kim; Jin Suk Kim; Tae Sik Kim
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-23

5.  Left atrial strain assessed by three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Atsushi Mochizuki; Satoshi Yuda; Takefumi Fujito; Mina Kawamukai; Atsuko Muranaka; Daigo Nagahara; Shinya Shimoshige; Akiyoshi Hashimoto; Tetsuji Miura
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2017-02-02

Review 6.  Rotors as drivers of atrial fibrillation and targets for ablation.

Authors:  Amir A Schricker; Gautam G Lalani; David E Krummen; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Atrial fibrillation therapy now and in the future: drugs, biologicals, and ablation.

Authors:  Christopher E Woods; Jeffrey Olgin
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  Catheter ablation versus anti-arrhythmic drug therapy for the management of a trial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Cheng; Xiaoqing Li; Yun He; Xiaoyan Liu; Guoqiang Wang; Li Cheng; Jianbo Hu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Electrophysiological Evaluation of Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Joris R de Groot; Wouter R Berger; Sébastien P J Krul; WimJan van Boven; Sacha P Salzberg; Antoine H G Driessen
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-10-31

10.  [Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Optimal approach and result].

Authors:  Shibu Mathew; Andreas Metzner; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Roland Richard Tilz
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.