| Literature DB >> 23093954 |
Taro Narumi1, Tetsuro Shishido, Nobuyuki Kiribayashi, Shinpei Kadowaki, Satoshi Nishiyama, Hiroki Takahashi, Takanori Arimoto, Takehiko Miyashita, Takuya Miyamoto, Tetsu Watanabe, Yoko Shibata, Tsuneo Konta, Yoshiyuki Ueno, Takeo Kato, Takamasa Kayama, Isao Kubota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) is part of the metabolic syndrome (Mets) that develops after lifestyle changes and obesity. Although the association between Mets and myocardial injury is well known, the effect of IR on myocardial damage remains unclear. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23093954 PMCID: PMC3474255 DOI: 10.1155/2012/815098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Diabetes Res ISSN: 1687-5214
Comparisons of clinical characteristics of 2200 subjects.
| Age (years)* | 69.1 ± 12.6 |
| Gender (male/female) | 973/1227 |
| BMI (kg/m2)* | 23.0 ± 3.3 |
| sBP (mm Hg)* | 134 ± 16 |
| dBP (mm Hg)* | 79 ± 10 |
| BNP (pg/mL)** | 20.0 (10.9–35.8) |
| TC (mg/dL)** | 200 (179–221) |
| TG (mg/dL)** | 91 (68–125) |
| HDLc (mg/dL)* | 59 ± 15 |
| LDLc (mg/dL)* | 124 ± 29 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)** | 96 (82–110) |
| H-FABP (ng/mL)** | 3.5 (2.6–4.7) |
BMI: body mass index; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDLc: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLc: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; H-FABP: heart type fatty acid binding protein; sBP: systolic blood pressure; dBP: diastolic blood pressure; Data are presented as *mean ± S.D; **median (interquartile range).
Comparisons of clinical characteristics of patients with and without IR.
| IR (−) | IR (+) | Mets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 63 ± 10 | 63 ± 10 | 63 ± 10 |
| Male | 659 (46.2%) | 169 (33.2%)* | 145 (54.9%)∗# |
| BMI | 21.9 ± 2.8 | 24.4 ± 3.2* | 26.1 ± 2.5∗# |
| sBP | 132 ± 16 | 136 ± 15* | 134 ± 14* |
| dBP | 78 ± 10 | 80 ± 10* | 84 ± 8∗# |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 21.5 (12.1–37.4) | 17.1 (9.5–30.5)* | 17.5 (9.4–33.6)* |
| TC (g/dL) | 197 (177–217) | 204 (187–226)* | 205 (182–229)* |
| TG (g/dL) | 81 (63–106) | 101 (77–128)* | 171 (150–224)∗# |
| HDL (g/dL) | 61 ± 14 | 58 ± 13* | 46 ± 12∗# |
| LDL (g/dL) | 122 ± 29 | 131 ± 28* | 124 ± 30∗# |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 97 (82–112) | 98 (83–111) | 86 (74–102)∗# |
| H-FABP (ng/mL) | 3.5 (2.6–4.6) | 3.6 (2.6–4.7)* | 3.7 (2.8–5.1)* |
BMI: body mass index; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDLc: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLc: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; H-FABP: heart type fatty acid binding protein; sBP: systolic blood pressure; dBP: diastolic blood pressure; Data are presented as mean ± S.D or median (interquartile range). *P < 0.05 versus IR (−); # P < 0.05 versus IR (+).
Figure 1Serum levels of H-FABP in the study population. Subjects with and without insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic syndrome (Mets) were included. In comparison to IR (−) subjects, subjects with IR and Mets showed an increase in H-FABP levels. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus subjects without IR.
Comparisons of clinical characteristics in male and female subjects.
| Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years)* | 64.0 ± 10.2 | 62.7 ± 10.0† |
| BMI (kg/m2)* | 22.9 ± 3.0 | 23.1 ± 3.5 |
| sBP (mm Hg)* | 136 ± 16 | 133 ± 16† |
| dBP (mm Hg)* | 82 ± 10 | 77 ± 9† |
| BNP (pg/mL)** | 17.6 (9.3–36.1) | 21.4 (12.4–35.3) |
| TC (mg/dL)** | 191 (173–211) | 206 (187–226)† |
| TG (mg/dL)** | 95 (70–135) | 89 (66–117)† |
| HDLc (mg/dL)* | 56 ± 14 | 61 ± 14† |
| LDLc (mg/dL)* | 119 ± 28 | 129 ± 28† |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)** | 82 (72–90) | 106 (97–124)† |
| H-FABP (ng/mL)** | 3.7 (2.8–4.8) | 3.4 (2.6–4.6)† |
BMI: body mass index; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDLc: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLc: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; H-FABP: heart type fatty acid binding protein; sBP: systolic blood pressure; dBP: diastolic blood pressure; Data are presented as *mean ± S.D; **median (interquartile range); † P < 0.05 versus male.
Comparisons of clinical characteristics of patients with and without IR and Mets in male.
| IR (−) | IR (+) | Mets (+) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 64 ± 10 | 64 ± 10 | 63 ± 8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.0 ± 3.0 | 24.2 ± 2.8* | 25.9 ± 2.3∗# |
| sBP (mm Hg) | 135 ± 16 | 138 ± 16* | 142 ± 13* |
| dBP (mm Hg) | 81 ± 10 | 83 ± 10 | 85 ± 9* |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 19.8 (10.2–37.6) | 13.8 (8.0–31.8)* | 14.2 (8.0–28.7)* |
| TC (mg/dL) | 189 (170–207) | 197 (179–215)* | 196 (173–224)∗# |
| TG (mg/dL) | 84 (64–111) | 104 (79–135)* | 184 (151–256)* |
| HDLc (mg/dL) | 59 ± 14 | 54 ± 12* | 43 ± 12∗# |
| LDLc (mg/dL) | 117 ± 28 | 128 ± 27* | 123 ± 29∗# |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 83 (72–92) | 76 (66–86)* | 77 (67–89)* |
| H-FABP (ng/mL) | 3.2 (2.4–4.5) | 3.6 (2.7–4.8)* | 3.8 (2.8–4.9)* |
BMI: body mass index; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDLc: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLc: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; H-FABP: heart type fatty acid binding protein; sBP: systolic blood pressure; dBP: diastolic blood pressure; Data are presented as mean ± S.D or median (interquartile range). *P < 0.05 versus IR (−); # P < 0.05 versus IR (+).
Comparisons of clinical characteristics of patients with and without IR and Mets in female.
| IR (−) | IR (+) | Mets (+) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 62 ± 10 | 62 ± 10 | 64 ± 8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.0 ± 3.0 | 24.5 ± 3.4* | 26.4 ± 2.7∗# |
| sBP (mm Hg) | 130 ± 16 | 135 ± 15* | 144 ± 12∗# |
| dBP (mm Hg) | 75 ± 9 | 78 ± 9* | 83 ± 8∗# |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 23.3 (14.0–37.0) | 18.5 (10.8–30.5)* | 19.8 (10.7–38.0)* |
| TC (mg/dL) | 204 (185–223) | 209 (190–232)* | 212 (192–237)* |
| TG (mg/dL) | 79 (62–102) | 100 (76–123)* | 166 (149–186)∗# |
| HDLc (mg/dL) | 64 ± 14 | 61 ± 13* | 48 ± 11∗# |
| LDLc (mg/dL) | 127 ± 28 | 133 ± 29* | 132 ± 29* |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 107 (98–126) | 104 (96–123) | 101 (86–121)* |
| H-FABP (ng/mL) | 3.3 (2.5–4.4) | 3.6 (2.6–4.8)* | 3.5 (2.7–5.2)* |
BMI: body mass index; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDLc: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLc: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; H-FABP: heart type fatty acid binding protein; sBP: systolic blood pressure; dBP: diastolic blood pressure; Data are presented as mean ± S.D or median (interquartile range). *P < 0.05 versus IR (−); # P < 0.05 versus IR (+).
Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis for high serum level of H-FABP.
| Variables | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Univariable analysis | |||
| Age (per 5 years increase) | 1.716 | 1.552–1.908 | <0.0001 |
| Male | 1.396 | 1.022–1.905 | 0.0357 |
| BMI | 1.224 | 0.881–1.701 | 0.2288 |
| BNP | 1.004 | 1.002–1.006 | 0.0008 |
| sBP | 1.493 | 1.076–2.071 | 0.0164 |
| dBP | 1.110 | 0.784–1.570 | 0.5565 |
| LDLc | 0.682 | 0.468–0.995 | 0.0468 |
| HDL (<40 mg/dL in male, <50 mg/dL in female) | 1.532 | 0.774–3.035 | 0.2209 |
| TG (above 150 mg/dL) | 0.730 | 0.377–1.415 | 0.3514 |
| TC (above 220 mg/dL) | 0.960 | 0.670–1.377 | 0.8265 |
| IR (presence of IR) | 1.399 | 1.002–1.953 | 0.0487 |
| Multivariable analysis | |||
| Age (per 5 years increase) | 1.707 | 1.531–1.908 | <0.0001 |
| Male | 1.258 | 0.904–1.750 | 0.1726 |
| BNP | 1.022 | 0.719–1.454 | 0.9023 |
| sBP | 1.041 | 0.736–1.472 | 0.8219 |
| IR (presence of IR) | 1.574 | 1.100–2.251 | 0.0131 |
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDLc: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLc: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; H-FABP: heart type fatty acid binding protein; sBP: systolic blood pressure; dBP: diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 2Comparison of latent and ongoing myocardial damage between subjects with and without IR. Latent and ongoing myocardial damage was defined as serum levels of heart type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) above 4.3 ng/mL. In comparison to IR (−) subjects, those with IR showed a higher incidence of myocardial damage.