Literature DB >> 23093814

Multiparametric statistical correlations between paranasal sinus anatomic variations and chronic rhinosinusitis.

G L Fadda1, S Rosso, S Aversa, A Petrelli, C Ondolo, G Succo.   

Abstract

Improvements in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and computed tomography (CT) have concurrently increased interest in the anatomy of the paranasal region. Common anatomical variations are not rare in patients with chronic paranasal sinusitis. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the incidence of anatomic variations of the lateral nasal wall in a series of 200 patients with persistent symptoms of rhinosinusitis, after failure of medical therapies, and their correlation with paranasal sinus disease. A detailed analysis of CT scans showed that 140 of 200 (70%) patients had anatomic variations. In particular, 122 patients (87%) were affected by common anatomic variations, and 18 patients (13%) with uncommon variations. There were 85 (60.7%) male and 55 (39.3%) females with ages ranging from 13 to 77 years (mean 45.5 years). The maxillary sinus was most commonly involved, followed by the anterior ethmoid, frontal sinus, posterior ethmoid and sphenoid sinus. Statistically significant association was found between the presence of common anatomic variations - septal deviation, bilateral concha bullosa, medial deviation of uncinate process, Haller cell, ethmoidal bulla hypertrophic, agger nasi cell - and the presence of sinus mucosal disease (p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between other common and uncommon anatomic variations and mucosal pathologies. The associations were evaluated using the Fisher's exact test, and compared with those reported in the literature. Considering the results obtained, we believe that some anatomic variations may increase the risk of sinus mucosal disease. We therefore emphasize the importance of a careful evaluation of CT study in patients with persistent symptoms and recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis in order to identify those with anatomical variations that may have an increased risk of developing rhinosinusitis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomic variations; Chronic rhinosinusitis; Computed tomography; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Paranasal sinuses

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23093814      PMCID: PMC3468938     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


Introduction

Several authors have assessed the relationship between sinonasal anatomic variants and the incidence of rhinosinusitis -. There is now worldwide interest among otolaryngologists in radiological definition of paranasal regional anatomy . Certain anatomic variations forming the lateral wall of the nose are very important because they can contribute to the blockage of the ostiomeatal units, drainage and ventilation, and can thereby increase the risk of sinus mucosal disease -. Moreover, anatomic variants with a potential impact on surgical safety occur frequently and need to be specifically sought as part of preoperative evaluation . Anatomic variations, such as deviation of the nasal septum, concha bullosa or paradoxical middle turbinate, ethmoidal bulla hypertrophic, agger nasi cell, lateral or medial bending of uncinate process (UP) and Haller cell are common and emphasized in routine evaluation of computed tomography (CT) images. Occasionally, some uncommon anatomic variations, in addition to those mentioned above, can increase the risk of surgical complications, especially when the operator lacks experience, and inadequate management of these anatomic conditions may be associated with residual disease or recurrence. Appropriate radiologic imaging and accurate interpretation play an important role in the diagnosis and management of these conditions. CT plays a central role in the modern management of chronic rhinosinusitis due to its ability to delineate mucosal disease, to demonstrate a primary obstructive pathology and to image distal structures such as the posterior ethmoid sinus that cannot be viewed with direct endoscopy . In this study, we reviewed the CT scans with at least one anatomical variation of 140 patients, of a total of 200 cases, suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis to investigate the common and uncommon anatomic variations and correlate them with the presence of radiologic evidence of sinus mucosal disease. Anatomic variants that have a potential impact on surgical safety were also assessed. Finally, we correlated the incidence of each anatomic variation with the presence of unilateral or bilateral sinusitis, and the results were compared with recent literature data.

Material and methods

At the ENT Department in San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital of Orbassano, Turin, Italy, we reviewed 200 coronal and axial high-resolution CT scans, from patients with persistent symptoms of rhinosinusitis who had failed medical therapies. The study excluded patients with odontogenic sinusitis, mycetoma, massive or recurrent polyposis, cystic fibrosis and patients who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery. Each CT was reviewed by the authors, investigating the presence of anatomic variations and sites of involved sinuses based on findings of opacification of CT scans. A detailed analysis of CT scans showed 140 of 200 (70%) patients had common or uncommon anatomic variations. 122 patients (87%) were affected by common anatomic variations, and 18 patients (13%) with uncommon variations. Anatomic variations were graded according to the classification proposed by Sarna et al. . A clinical diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis was made on physical examination and clinical criteria reported by the Task Force on Rhinosinusitis ; all patients underwent examination by diagnostic nasal endoscopy using a nasal telescope. Clinical findings included posterior nasal drip, headache, facial pain over the area of the affected sinus, nasal obstruction, purulent rhinorrhoea and hyposmia. The statistical analysis was useful to assess the relationship between common and uncommon anatomic variations and the presence of unilateral or bilateral sinusitis. Associations were evaluated using the Fisher's exact test. A chi-square was not appropriate for this data because the expected frequencies were less than 5 for more of 25% of the cells of the contingency tables (data not shown). Analyses were conducted using SAS System 9.2. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Eighty-five patients (85/140) affected by chronic sinusitis and anatomic variations underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and the procedures were tailored appropriately if there was a common or uncommon anatomic variation.

Results

A total of 140 of 200 patients showing symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis who had at least one sign on CT anatomic variation were included in this study. 85 (60.7%) patients were male and 55 (39.3%) were female with ages ranging from 13 to 77 years (mean 45.5 years). The analysis of CT scans showed that the affected side was right in 40 (28.6%) patients, left in 84 (60%) patients and bilateral in 105 patients (75%). Nineteen (13.6%) patients had no signs of disease on CT. Regarding the CT prevalence of sinusal opacities in the group of 106 patients with sinusitis, 94 (67.1%) had maxillary sinusitis, 76 (54.3%) anterior ethmoid sinusitis, 31 (22.1%) frontal sinusitis, 14 (10%) posterior ethmoid sinusitis and 14 (10%) had sphenoid sinusitis. Pathology at osteomeatal complex (OMC) on CT scan was observed in 106 (75.7%) patients in this series (Table I).
Table I.

CT scans prevalence of sinusal opacities in the group of 140 patients with sinusitis (*OMC: osteomeatal complex).

SinusitisUnilateral, N (%)Bilateral, N (%)Total, N (%)
Right, N (%)Left, N (%)Total, N (%)
Maxillary18 (12.8)40 (28.6)58 (41.4)36 (25.7)94 (67.1)
Anterior ethmoid12 (8.6)24 (17.1)36 (25.7)40 (28.6)76 (54.3)
Frontal6 (4.3)13 (9.3)19 (13.6)12 (8.5)31 (22.1)
Posterior ethmoid2 (1.4)3 (2.1)5 (3.5)9 (6.5)14 (10)
Sphenoid2 (1.4)4 (2.9)6 (4.3)8 (5.7)14 (10)
Closed OMC*18 (12.9)17 (12.1)35 (25)71 (50.7)106 (75.7)
CT scans prevalence of sinusal opacities in the group of 140 patients with sinusitis (*OMC: osteomeatal complex). The most common anatomic variation (Table II) observed on CT scans was nasal septal deviation, which was presented by 82 patients (58.5%). Concha bullosa of the middle turbinate was the second most common variant, observed in 69 patients (49.3%), and was mostly seen on one side of the nasal wall (30.7%). A total of 46 patients (32.8%) had hypertrophic ethmoid bulla, whereas agger nasi cell was observed in 34 patients (24.3%). Considering the UP, its lateral deviation was found in 30 patients (21.4%), whereas its medial deviation was presented by 32 patients (22.8%); a hypertrophic UP was observed in 14 patients (10%) and atelectatic in 9 patients (6.3%). Haller cell was observed in 32 patients (22.8%); frontal cells were seen in 17 patients (12.1%), and Onodi cell in 12 patients (8.5%); paradoxical middle turbinate was observed in only 9 patients (6.4%); hypoplastic maxillary sinus was present in 8 patients (5.7%) and septated maxillary sinus in 7 patients (5%). With respect to the level difference between the ethmoid and cribriform plate, Keros type I was the most common and seen in 22 patients (15.7%), followed by type II in 11 (7.8%) and type III in 2 patients (1.4%). Pneumatization of crista galli was observed in 19 patients (13.6%) and pneumatization of the nasal septum in 13 patients (9.3%) (Fig. 1a, b).
Table II.

Common anatomic variations in CT scans of 140 patients with chronic paranasal sinusitis.

Common anatomic variationsUnilateral, N (%)Bilateral, N (%)Total, N (%)
Right, N (%)Left, N (%)Total, N (%)
Septal deviation36 (25.7)46 (32.85)--82 (58.5)
Hypertrophic ethmoidal bulla9 (6.4)19 (13.6)28 (20)18 (12.8)46 (32.8)
Large agger nasi cell5 (3.6)7 (5)12 (8.6)22 (15.7)34 (24.3)
Middle turbinate
  Concha bullosa20 (14.3)23 (16.4)43 (30.7)26 (18.6)69 (49.3)
  Paradoxical4 (2.8)3 (2.1)7 (5)2 (1.4)9 (6.4)
Uncinate process
  Lateral deviation10 (7.1)6 (4.3)16 (11.4)14 (10)30 (21.4)
  Medial deviation10 (7.1)4 (2.9)14 (10)18 (12.8)32 (22.8)
  Hypertrophy2 (1.4)7 (5)9 (6.4)5 (3.5)14 (10)
  Atelectatic1 (0.7)4 (2.8)5 (3.5)4 (2.8)9 (6.3)
Haller's cell8 (5.7)8 (5.7)16 (11.4)16 (11.4)32 (22.8)
Onodi cell4 (2.8)6 (4.3)10 (7.1)2 (1.4)12 (8.5)
Maxillary sinus
  Hypoplastic1 (0.7)5 (3.6)6 (4.3)2 (1.4)8 (5.7)
  Septated2 (1.4)4 (2.9)6 (4.3)1 (0.7)7 (5)
Roof of the ethmoid #Type I : 22 (15.7) Types II : 11 (7.8)Types III : 2 (1.4)35 (25)
Frontal cells *Type I : 11 (7.8) Type II : 6 (4.3)Type III : 1 (0.7)17 (12.1)
Pneumatization of crista galli 19 (13.6)
Pneumatization of nasal septum 13 (9.3)

Roof of the ethmoid: Keros type I, olfactory fossa is 1-3 mm deep; Keros type II, olfactory fossa is 4-7 mm deep; Keros type III, olfactory fossa is 8-16 mm deep (41).

Frontal cell types: type I, single frontal recess above agger nasi cell; type II, tier of cells in frontal recess above agger nasi cell; type III, single massive cell pneumatizing cephalad into frontal sinus; type IV, single isolated cell within the frontal sinus (42).

Fig. 1.

Coronal CT scans. a) Nasal septal pneumatization. b) Extensive pneumatization of the crista galli or bulla galli. Right concha bullosa; left pneumatization of the uncinate process; deviation of the nasal septum convexity to the left can be seen; small bilateral Haller cells are also present.

Coronal CT scans. a) Nasal septal pneumatization. b) Extensive pneumatization of the crista galli or bulla galli. Right concha bullosa; left pneumatization of the uncinate process; deviation of the nasal septum convexity to the left can be seen; small bilateral Haller cells are also present. Common anatomic variations in CT scans of 140 patients with chronic paranasal sinusitis. Roof of the ethmoid: Keros type I, olfactory fossa is 1-3 mm deep; Keros type II, olfactory fossa is 4-7 mm deep; Keros type III, olfactory fossa is 8-16 mm deep (41). Frontal cell types: type I, single frontal recess above agger nasi cell; type II, tier of cells in frontal recess above agger nasi cell; type III, single massive cell pneumatizing cephalad into frontal sinus; type IV, single isolated cell within the frontal sinus (42). A total of 18 uncommon anatomic variations were seen (12.8%) in the 140 patients. These included pneumatization of UP in 4 cases (2.8%); massive concha bullosa of middle turbinate in 4 cases (2.8%) (Fig. 2a, b), massive pneumatization of frontal sinus in 3 cases (2.1%); lateralized maxillary sinus in 2 cases (1.4%); single sphenoid sinus in 2 cases (1.4%); separated uncinate process in 2 cases (1.4%) and nontraumatic protrusion of orbital contents through dehiscence of lamina papyracea in 1 case (0.7%) (Fig. 3a, b).
Fig. 2.

Coronal CT scan and corresponding endoscopic image of concha bullosa. a) Large right concha bullosa with moderate deviation of the nasal septum convexity to the left. There is also small Haller cell on the right side, and Keros grade II. b) Masssive left mucopyocele of the concha bullosa of the middle turbinate presenting as a large nasal mass.

Fig. 3.

Coronal CT scans (a) and magnetic resonance imaging (b) reveal protrusion of the orbital contents through the dehiscence of lamina papyracea on the left side. The medial rectus muscle (arrow) could be a marker in differentiation of the ethmoiditis and orbital contents.

Coronal CT scan and corresponding endoscopic image of concha bullosa. a) Large right concha bullosa with moderate deviation of the nasal septum convexity to the left. There is also small Haller cell on the right side, and Keros grade II. b) Masssive left mucopyocele of the concha bullosa of the middle turbinate presenting as a large nasal mass. Coronal CT scans (a) and magnetic resonance imaging (b) reveal protrusion of the orbital contents through the dehiscence of lamina papyracea on the left side. The medial rectus muscle (arrow) could be a marker in differentiation of the ethmoiditis and orbital contents. Multiparametric statistical analysis correlations are represented in Table IV. With regards to septal deviation, there was a statistically significant significance between left septal deviation and left maxillary sinusitis (p < 0.01). We also found a correlation between bilateral concha bullosa and bilateral maxillary sinusitis (p < 0.01). Considering the uncinate process, we investigated the correlation between hypertrophic UP, its lateral or medial deviation and the presence of anterior ethmoid sinusitis. It was seen that right and bilateral medial UP deviation was associated with right and bilateral anterior ethmoid sinusitis (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). There was a statistically significance between right Haller cell and ipsilateral maxillary sinusitis, left Haller cell and left maxillary sinusitis and bilateral Haller cell and bilateral maxillary sinusitis (all p < 0.01).
Table IV.

Statistically significant correlation between anatomical variations and disease extension of sinusitis (Fisher's exact test).

Anatomic variationsSinusitisp
Left septal deviationLeft maxillary< 0.01
Bilateral concha bullosaBilateral maxillary< 0.01
Medial deviation of uncinate processAnterior ethmoid
  Right  Right< 0.01
  Bilateral  Bilateral< 0.05
Haller's cellMaxillary
  Right  Right< 0.01
  Left  Left
  Bilateral  Bilateral
Ethmoidal bulla hypertrophicAnterior ethmoid
  Right  Right< 0.01
  Bilateral  Bilateral
Agger nasi cellFrontal
  Right  Right< 0.01
  Left  Left< 0.05
Statistically significant correlation between anatomical variations and disease extension of sinusitis (Fisher's exact test). A statistically significant correlation between right and bilateral hypertrophic ethmoid bulla and ipsilateral and bilateral anterior ethmoid sinusitis was also seen (p < 0.01). In addition, there was a statistically significant significance between right and left agger nasi cell and homolateral frontal sinusitis (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). No other statistically significant correlations were demonstrated between any other common and uncommon anatomic variations and ipsilateral, contralateral or bilateral sinusitis.

Discussion

Anatomic variations of paranasal sinus structures may predispose patients to recurrent sinusitis and, in selected cases, to headache . However, the relative importance of anatomic variations is still a matter of discussion and variable results have been reported . Kim et al., Lerdlum et al., and Stallman et al. showed no specific association of anatomic variations in rhinosinusitis, and claimed that local, systemic, environmental factors or intrinsic mucosal disease were more significant in the pathogenesis of rhinosinusitis . Nasal septal deviation is present in 20-31% of the general population, and severe deviation has been noted as a contributing factor for sinusitis . However, some studies have not demonstrated a causal relationship between nasal septal deviation and sinusitis . We found a statistically significant correlation between left septal deviation and left maxillary sinusitis (p < 0.01) (Table III).
Table III.

Uncommon anatomic variations in CT scans of 140 patients with chronic paranasal sinusitis.

Uncommon anatomic variationsRight, N (%)Left, N (%)Bilateral, N (%)Total, N (%)
Uncinate process
  Pneumatization1 (0.7)3 (2.1)-4 (2.8)
  Separated2 (1.4)--2 (1.4)
Large concha bullosa of middle turbinate3 (2.1)1 (0.7)04 (2.8)
Massive pneumatization frontal sinus-2 (1.4)1 (0.7)3 (2.1)
Lateralized maxillary sinus--2 (1.4)2 (1.4)
Single sphenoid sinus 2 (1.4)
Nontraumatic protusion of orbital contents through dehiscence of lamina papyracea-1 (0.7)-1 (0.7)
Uncommon anatomic variations in CT scans of 140 patients with chronic paranasal sinusitis. Normal ethmoid bulla was detected in 94 of 140 patients (67.2%), compared to 17-89% of cases in previous reports . Ethmoid bulla hypertrophic – prominent – was present in 32.8% of patients in our study (Fig. 4). Krzeski et al. reported a frequency of 26.75% , while Scribano estimated that it is only 3.5% . In our study, there was significant correlation between hypertrophic ethmoidal bulla and sinusitis of anterior ethmoid (p < 0.01), which has not been reported in the literature (Table IV).
Fig. 4.

Coronal CT scan and corresponding endoscopic image of left hypertrophic ethmoidal bulla. There is also right concha bullosa with lateral deviation of the uncinate process.

Coronal CT scan and corresponding endoscopic image of left hypertrophic ethmoidal bulla. There is also right concha bullosa with lateral deviation of the uncinate process. The term concha bullosa was coined by Zuckerlandl in 1862 to describe pneumatization of the middle turbinate, and its incidence was reported to range from 9% to 20% based on initial anatomical dissections. The significance of this most common anatomic variation of the middle turbinate lies in the potential secondary deformity of the turbinate, which increases the probability of obstruction of the middle meatus and lead to recurrent ethmoid sinusitis . Bolger et al. reported three types of the middle turbinate pneumatization: the vertical lamella was pneumatized in 46.2% of cases ("lamellar cell") in the inferior bulbous portion in 31.2% of patients and in the entire middle turbinate in 15.7% of cases ("true" concha bullosa) . Unilateral or bilateral concha bullosa was detected in 49.3% of patients in the present series. According to data from the literature, the incidence of positive CT findings for concha bullosa varies from 14% to 62% -. In particular, incidences of 37.5%, 44% and 48.1%, respectively, were reported by Krzeski et al. , Stallman et al. and Ozcan et al. . There are different opinions in the literature concerning concomitance with mucosal pathologies. Herein, multivariate analysis showed that bilateral concha bullosa was associated with sinusitis bilateral maxillary (p < 0.05) (Table IV) in agreement with previous reports , while other studies found no direct relationship . Stallman JS et al. reported a significant relationship between the presence of concha bullosa and deviation of the nasal septal on the contralateral side (p < 0.0001) . Paradoxical curvature of the middle turbinate is described as a convexity pointing toward the middle meatus, and is reported as a possible cause for closed OMC and mucosal pathologies . In our study, the incidence of middle paradoxical turbinate was 6.4%, and was not associated with mucosal pathologies. The rates of this variation in previous publications are highly variable, with incidences ranging from 3% to 40% . Nouraei et al., in a review of 278 CT scans, found only two (0.7%) cases with paradoxical curves . The UP is another important structure in relation to paranasal sinus drainage, and the incidence of variations in this structure is generally from 15.9% to 44.3% ; in our study, it was 65% (Fig. 5a-d).
Fig. 5.

Coronal CT scan and corresponding endoscopic images of possible variations of uncinate process (UP, arrows). a) Left pneumatization UP; b) Right separated UP; c) Hypertrophy left UP; d) Medial deviation UP (UP = uncinate process; MT = middle turbinate).

Coronal CT scan and corresponding endoscopic images of possible variations of uncinate process (UP, arrows). a) Left pneumatization UP; b) Right separated UP; c) Hypertrophy left UP; d) Medial deviation UP (UP = uncinate process; MT = middle turbinate). Medial deflection of UP was previously described in 3-19% of cases . Herein, it was observed in 22.8% of patients, while lateral deflection of UP was observed in 21.4% of cases. We found that the UP was pneumatized in 2.8% of patients. The rate of UP pneumatization in previous studies has been reported to be from 1-9% . Our study showed that medial deviation of UP was statistically associated with anterior ethmoidal sinusitis (p < 0.05) (Table IV). Maxillary sinus hypoplasia (MSH) is the most important anatomical variation among those involving the maxillary sinus (MS). MSH typing was done by Bolger et al. in 1990 . Since MSH is often associated with orbital enlargement, thickening of the bony sinus wall, mucosal pathology, anterior ethmoidal cell variation or frontal sinus hypoplasia, it is important to identify these anatomical variations for proper surgical planning to prevent complications . The incidence of MS septae was found to vary from 20-31% in previous reports . In our study, the maxillary sinus was hypoplastic in 5.7% and septated in 5%, less than that previously reported, while over-pneumatization or lateralized variation was found in 1.4% of patients (Fig. 6a-c). There was no significant correlation between these anatomical variations and mucosal pathologies, in agreement with literature data .
Fig. 6.

Coronal CT scans of the maxillary sinuses. a) Bilateral lateralized; b) Bilateral septated; c) Bilateral hypoplasia of the maxillary sinuses.

Coronal CT scans of the maxillary sinuses. a) Bilateral lateralized; b) Bilateral septated; c) Bilateral hypoplasia of the maxillary sinuses. The OMC is a functional entity of the anterior ethmoid complex that represents the final common pathway for drainage and ventilation of the frontal, maxillary and anterior ethmoid cells. Thus, anatomical variations that redirect nasal airflow or narrow the OMC have been implicated in the development of chronic rhinosinusitis . In this study, patients with pathologies at OMC (106/140) had involvement of multiple sinuses and were found to have increased symptom severity. Another common anatomic variant was the presence of infraorbital ethmoid cells, also known as Haller cells. These are found between the maxillary sinus and the orbit and can increase the risk of orbital injury during ethmoidectomy . Haller cells are a clinically significant anatomic variation because they have been implicated as a possible aetiologic factor in recurrent maxillary sinusitis due blockage of the OMC (Fig. 7) . In previous studies, a variable incidence of Haller cells has been noted. In particular, Kennedy et al. and Meloni et al. 36 both reported rates of 10%, while Arslan et al. reported an incidence of 6% and Bolger et al. an incidence of 45.1%. Possible reasons for this discrepancy include differences in interpretation of Haller cells, or in the technique of CT scanning.
Fig. 7.

Coronal CT scan of bilateral large Haller's cell and closed osteomeatal complex.

Coronal CT scan of bilateral large Haller's cell and closed osteomeatal complex. In our study, the incidence of Haller cells was 22.8%, and we found a statistically significant relationship with maxillary sinusitis (p < 0.01), in agreement with what reported by Van Alyea . The reported prevalence of the agger nasi cell varies widely among investigators. In anatomic dissection, Messerklinger encountered the agger nasi cell in 10- 15% of specimens. Kantarci et al. , however, noted this cell in 47% of specimens, while Krzeski reported its presence in 52.9% of cases and Van Alyea in 89% of individuals. Kennedy and Zinreich noted the presence of the agger nasi cell in nearly all patients evaluated . Similarly, Bolger et al. reported that it was present in 98.5% of cases . In our study, agger nasi cells were detected in 24.3% of cases, and by multivariate analysis was associated with frontal sinusitis. The incidence rates reported in the literature, from 3% to 100% , may in part be related to the different method of analysis employed by Krzeski et al. . Although the sphenoethmoid (Onodi) cell is an anatomic variant that is not associated with sinusitis, its presence poses an increased incidence of surgical complications for risk of injury to optic nerves or carotid arteries . In our work, these cells were present in 8.5% of patients. Nouraei et al. reported an incidence of 4.7% , while Stallman et al. reported an incidence of Onodi cells from 3.4-51% . According to Keros' classification of the roof of the ethmoid, in our study there were 15.7% of patients in group I, 7.8% in group II and 1.4% in group III .

Conclusions

The results of this retrospective study highlight the statistically significant correlation between some anatomical variations of the lateral wall of the nose and pathologies of the paranasal sinus. This investigation also reinforces the fact that careful assessment and CT in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis is needed, especially in those undergoing endoscopic surgery, to identify the presence of anatomical variations in the paranasal sinus that may be correlated with rhinosinusitis. This also helps to identify and treat variations that may be associated with persistence or recurrence of disease. Finally, we believe that some anatomical variations of the paranasal sinus can play an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis, and thus may increase the risk of sinus mucosal disease.
  35 in total

1.  Anatomic variations of the lateral nasal wall in the computed tomography scans of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  A Krzeski; E Tomaszewska; I Jakubczyk; A Galewicz-Zielińska
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  Important anatomic variations of the sinonasal anatomy in light of endoscopic surgery: a pictorial review.

Authors:  M Bayram; A Sirikci; Y A Bayazit
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Nasoseptal variation in relation to sinusitis. A computerized tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  A L Hamdan; A R Bizri; M Jaber; D Hammoud; T Baino; N Fuleihan
Journal:  J Med Liban       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Remarkable anatomic variations in paranasal sinus region and their clinical importance.

Authors:  Mecit Kantarci; R Murat Karasen; Fatih Alper; Omer Onbas; Adnan Okur; Adem Karaman
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique.

Authors:  H Stammberger; W Posawetz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Paranasal sinuses: CT imaging requirements for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S J Zinreich; D W Kennedy; A E Rosenbaum; B W Gayler; A J Kumar; H Stammberger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  On the drainage of the normal frontal sinus of man.

Authors:  W Messerklinger
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1967 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease.

Authors:  Jamie S Stallman; Joao N Lobo; Peter M Som
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W E Bolger; C A Butzin; D S Parsons
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Anatomic variants and pearls--functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Raju Polavaram; Anand K Devaiah; Osamu Sakai; Stanley M Shapshay
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.346

View more
  25 in total

1.  Radiological Study of Maxillary Sinus using CBCT: Relationship between Mucosal Thickening and Common Anatomic Variants in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Marco Capelli; Patrizia Gatti
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

2.  Sinonasal anatomical variations: their relationship with chronic rhinosinusitis and effect on the severity of disease-a computerized tomography assisted anatomical and clinical study.

Authors:  Ahmet Kaygusuz; Mehmet Haksever; Davut Akduman; Sündüs Aslan; Zeynep Sayar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-10-15

3.  The role of septated concha bullosa on sinonasal pathologies.

Authors:  Turhan San; Selma San; Emre Gürkan; Barış Erdoğan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Unusual case of bilateral maxillary fungus ball.

Authors:  Alessandro Vinciguerra; Alberto Maria Saibene; Paolo Lozza; Alberto Maccari
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-15

5.  Sinonasal Anatomical Variants: CT and Endoscopy Study and Its Correlation with Extent of Disease.

Authors:  Vandana Mendiratta; Nitish Baisakhiya; Dalbir Singh; Ginni Datta; Amit Mittal; Parveen Mendiratta
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-09-29

6.  The effect of anatomic variations and maxillary sinus volume in antrochoanal polyp formation.

Authors:  Engin Başer; Orkun Sarıoğlu; İlker Burak Arslan; İbrahim Çukurova
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Computer-assisted staging of chronic rhinosinusitis correlates with symptoms.

Authors:  Jonathan Garneau; Michael Ramirez; Samuel G Armato; William F Sensakovic; Megan K Ford; Colin S Poon; Daniel T Ginat; Adam Starkey; Fuad M Baroody; Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.858

8.  Evaluation of variations in sinonasal region with computed tomography.

Authors:  Ufuk Dasar; Erkan Gokce
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

9.  Nasal septal deformities in chronic rhinosinusitis patients: clinical and radiological aspects.

Authors:  G Poje; J S Zinreich; N Skitarelić; K Đurić Vuković; G C Passàli; D Passàli; R Mladina
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Intracranial complication of rhinosinusitis from actinomycosis of the paranasal sinuses: a rare case of abducens nerve palsy.

Authors:  G L Fadda; M Gisolo; E Crosetti; A Fulcheri; G Succo
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.