Literature DB >> 23093489

Effects of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on bone turnover markers in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization procedure.

U Omodei1, G Mazziotti, G Donarini, M Gola, V Guella, F Pagani, G Bugari, T Porcelli, A Giustina.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: There is experimental but limited clinical evidence that FSH may have direct effects on bone.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of acute FSH stimulation on bone turnover in premenopausal women. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We conducted a prospective study at a referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine infertile women (age range, 30-40 yr) undergoing an in vitro fertilization procedure were included in the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Pharmacological suppression of endogenous gonadotropin and estradiol (E2) production by GnRH analog (leuprolide 1 mg/d s.c.) was followed by stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH; starting dose, 375 IU/d s.c.). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured serum osteocalcin, C-telopeptides of type-1 collagen (β-CTX), FSH, and E2 at the beginning of leuprolide administration (T0), at the beginning of rFSH administration (T1), and 3 d (T2) and 10 d (T3) after the first dose of rFSH.
RESULTS: At T1, the suppression of FSH and E2 secretion, as an effect of leuprolide administration, led to a significant increase in serum β-CTX values vs. T0 (P < 0.001). After the administration of rFSH, a rapid increase in serum FSH was observed, whereas serum E2 values increased more slowly. At T2, the increase in serum FSH values above our reference range for early follicular phase (with E2 in the reference range) did not induce any significant change in median serum β-CTX values as compared to T1. At T3 (when both FSH and E2 were high), serum β-CTX values decreased significantly vs. T1 (P < 0.001). Osteocalcin did not change significantly throughout the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that FSH does not acutely exert relevant direct effects on bone metabolism in premenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23093489     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-2778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  5 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen Versus FSH Effects on Bone Metabolism: Evidence From Interventional Human Studies.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  FSH suppression does not affect bone turnover in eugonadal men.

Authors:  Alexander V Uihlein; Joel S Finkelstein; Hang Lee; Benjamin Z Leder
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  FSH and bone: Comparison between males with central versus primary hypogonadism.

Authors:  Luca Giovanelli; Richard Quinton; Biagio Cangiano; Stefano Colombo; Luca Persani; Marco Bonomi; Iacopo Chiodini
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 4.  FSH and TSH in the regulation of bone mass: the pituitary/immune/bone axis.

Authors:  Graziana Colaianni; Concetta Cuscito; Silvia Colucci
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2013-05-30

Review 5.  The Relationship Between Bone and Reproductive Hormones Beyond Estrogens and Androgens.

Authors:  Edouard G Mills; Lisa Yang; Morten F Nielsen; Moustapha Kassem; Waljit S Dhillo; Alexander N Comninos
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 19.871

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.