BACKGROUND: Exercise performance and pulmonary function are often impaired in severely obese subjects. Bariatric surgery represents the most effective therapy for severe obesity, but data on changes in exercise performance after massive weight loss induced by bariatric surgery have rarely been assessed so far. METHODS: Exercise performance was obtained by bicycle spiroergometry in 18 severely obese patients before and at least 1 year after bariatric surgery. Additionally, pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry. RESULTS: BMI was reduced from 46.3 ± 1.6 to 33.5 ± 1.4 kg/m(2) after surgery. Pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume within 1 s; inspiratory vital capacity) improved after weight loss (both p ≤ 0.01). At peak exercise, heart rate (HR) peak, absolute oxygen uptake (VO(2)) peak, and load peak did not differ between both assessments (all p > 0.25). However, relative (related to actual body weight) VO(2) peak and workload peak were higher after than before surgery (both p ≤ 0.005), while gross efficiency peak and ventilatory equivalent peak remained unchanged (both p > 0.30). At anaerobic threshold (AT), patients showed lower HR AT and absolute VO(2) AT after than before surgery (both p < 0.05), while absolute workload AT did not differ (p = 0.58). In turn, relative VO(2) AT did not change (p = 0.30), whereas relative workload AT was higher after surgery (p = 0.04). Also, ventilatory efficiency AT and gross efficiency AT tended to be improved (both p = 0.08). Before surgery, the patients performed 27.0 % of VO(2) peak above their AT, while this fraction increased to 35.3 % (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated differential changes in exercise performance, with the relative but not the absolute peak performance being improved after massive weight loss. Interestingly, anaerobic exercise tolerance was markedly improved after surgery.
BACKGROUND: Exercise performance and pulmonary function are often impaired in severely obese subjects. Bariatric surgery represents the most effective therapy for severe obesity, but data on changes in exercise performance after massive weight loss induced by bariatric surgery have rarely been assessed so far. METHODS: Exercise performance was obtained by bicycle spiroergometry in 18 severely obesepatients before and at least 1 year after bariatric surgery. Additionally, pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry. RESULTS: BMI was reduced from 46.3 ± 1.6 to 33.5 ± 1.4 kg/m(2) after surgery. Pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume within 1 s; inspiratory vital capacity) improved after weight loss (both p ≤ 0.01). At peak exercise, heart rate (HR) peak, absolute oxygen uptake (VO(2)) peak, and load peak did not differ between both assessments (all p > 0.25). However, relative (related to actual body weight) VO(2) peak and workload peak were higher after than before surgery (both p ≤ 0.005), while gross efficiency peak and ventilatory equivalent peak remained unchanged (both p > 0.30). At anaerobic threshold (AT), patients showed lower HR AT and absolute VO(2) AT after than before surgery (both p < 0.05), while absolute workload AT did not differ (p = 0.58). In turn, relative VO(2) AT did not change (p = 0.30), whereas relative workload AT was higher after surgery (p = 0.04). Also, ventilatory efficiency AT and gross efficiency AT tended to be improved (both p = 0.08). Before surgery, the patients performed 27.0 % of VO(2) peak above their AT, while this fraction increased to 35.3 % (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated differential changes in exercise performance, with the relative but not the absolute peak performance being improved after massive weight loss. Interestingly, anaerobic exercise tolerance was markedly improved after surgery.
Authors: Sai Krupa Das; Susan B Roberts; Joseph J Kehayias; Jack Wang; L K George Hsu; Scott A Shikora; Edward Saltzman; Megan A McCrory Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sudip Bajpeyi; Charles J Tanner; Cris A Slentz; Brian D Duscha; Jennifer S McCartney; Robert C Hickner; William E Kraus; Joseph A Houmard Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2009-02-05
Authors: Maurizio De Luca; Luigi Angrisani; Jacques Himpens; Luca Busetto; Nicola Scopinaro; Rudolf Weiner; Alberto Sartori; Christine Stier; Muffazal Lakdawala; Aparna G Bhasker; Henry Buchwald; John Dixon; Sonja Chiappetta; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Gema Frühbeck; David B Sarwer; Michel Suter; Emanuele Soricelli; Mattias Blüher; Ramon Vilallonga; Arya Sharma; Scott Shikora Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Matthew G Browning; Robert L Franco; Jeffrey E Herrick; James A Arrowood; Ronald K Evans Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Dalane W Kitzman; Peter Brubaker; Timothy Morgan; Mark Haykowsky; Gregory Hundley; William E Kraus; Joel Eggebeen; Barbara J Nicklas Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Justin R Ryder; Nicholas M Edwards; Resmi Gupta; Jane Khoury; Todd M Jenkins; Sharon Bout-Tabaku; Marc P Michalsky; Carroll M Harmon; Thomas H Inge; Aaron S Kelly Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 16.193