Literature DB >> 23093369

Quantifying the consequences of conifer succession in aspen stands: decline in a biodiversity-supporting community.

S A McCullough1, A T O'Geen, M L Whiting, D A Sarr, K W Tate.   

Abstract

Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michaux) stands are important for biodiversity in conifer-dominated forest landscapes. Our goal was to quantify the consequences of conifer succession on understory diversity and litter quality, as well as associated changes in aspen stand condition. We studied aspen stands on national park land in the transition zone between the northern Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade mountain ranges. We field-measured ten metrics of aspen stand condition in 29 aspen stands. Along a gradient of increasing current conifer cover, we observed decreases in herbaceous species diversity and richness and an increase in forest floor O horizon depth. We interpreted aerial photos from 1952 and 1998 to determine whether directional changes in conifer cover had occurred in the stands over the past half century, and used regression modeling to associate succession with the observed range of aspen stand condition. From the period 1952 to 1998, we found that conifer encroachment occurred in half the sampled stands, with an average increase in conifer cover of 1% a year. Aspen were persistent in the remaining stands. Stand cover dynamics and percent total canopy cover interacted to influence species richness, diversity, aspen sprouting, and litter quality. In stands with conifer encroachment, both understory species richness and diversity declined. Although aspen sprouting increased, aspen establishment declined and the relative mass of woody to fine soil litter increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23093369     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2967-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  2 in total

1.  A selection of forest condition indicators for monitoring.

Authors:  K H Rutters; B E Law; R C Kucera; A L Gallant; R L Develice; C J Palmer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Reconciling divergent interpretations of quaking aspen decline on the northern Colorado Front Range.

Authors:  Daniel M Kashian; William H Romme; Claudia M Regan
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.657

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  76-year decline and recovery of aspen mediated by contrasting fire regimes: Long-unburned, infrequent and frequent mixed-severity wildfire.

Authors:  Cerena J Brewen; John-Pascal Berrill; Martin W Ritchie; Kevin Boston; Christa M Dagley; Bobette Jones; Michelle Coppoletta; Coye L Burnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.