Tsia-Shu Lo1, Yiap Loong Tan, Siwatchaya Khanuengkitkong, Anil Krishna Dass. 1. Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, School of Medicine, 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Kwei-shan, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan, Republic of China. 2378@cgmh.org.tw
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent surgical repair of advanced pelvic organ prolapse amongst with normal-weight, overweight and obese Asian women. METHODS: Vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with anterior mesh repair as primary surgery was performed on 200 patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q ≥ stage III). POP-Q < stage II was objective cure and subjective cure was based on POPDI-6 (questions 2 and 3). Patients completed the UDI-6, IIQ-7, POPDI-6, and PISQ-12 pre- and post-surgery. Outcome measures were observed in three categories of Asian BMI (normal weight 18.5 to 23.0 kg/m(2), overweight >23.0 to 27.5 kg/m(2), and obese ≥ 27.5 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Postoperative data were available for 195 patients. Objective cure for the normal-weight, overweight, and obese were 93.0%, 92.5% and 90.6% respectively with an overall mean follow-up of 35.69 ± 18.97 months. The subjective cure was no different. All categories improved significantly with regard to anatomical outcome, UDI-6, IIQ-7, POPDI-6, PISQ-12 after primary surgery (p < 0.05) and none had recurrence requiring further surgery. However, obese patients have significantly less improvement in POPDI-6 (p <0.037) and PISQ-12 (p <0.005) compared with normal weight. There were no differences with regard to perioperative complications and the vaginal mesh exposure rate was 4.1%. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the objective outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation with anterior mesh repair surgery among the three Asian BMI categories; however, obese patients showed less improvement in POP symptoms and sexual function.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent surgical repair of advanced pelvic organ prolapse amongst with normal-weight, overweight and obese Asian women. METHODS: Vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with anterior mesh repair as primary surgery was performed on 200 patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q ≥ stage III). POP-Q < stage II was objective cure and subjective cure was based on POPDI-6 (questions 2 and 3). Patients completed the UDI-6, IIQ-7, POPDI-6, and PISQ-12 pre- and post-surgery. Outcome measures were observed in three categories of Asian BMI (normal weight 18.5 to 23.0 kg/m(2), overweight >23.0 to 27.5 kg/m(2), and obese ≥ 27.5 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Postoperative data were available for 195 patients. Objective cure for the normal-weight, overweight, and obese were 93.0%, 92.5% and 90.6% respectively with an overall mean follow-up of 35.69 ± 18.97 months. The subjective cure was no different. All categories improved significantly with regard to anatomical outcome, UDI-6, IIQ-7, POPDI-6, PISQ-12 after primary surgery (p < 0.05) and none had recurrence requiring further surgery. However, obesepatients have significantly less improvement in POPDI-6 (p <0.037) and PISQ-12 (p <0.005) compared with normal weight. There were no differences with regard to perioperative complications and the vaginal mesh exposure rate was 4.1%. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the objective outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation with anterior mesh repair surgery among the three Asian BMI categories; however, obesepatients showed less improvement in POP symptoms and sexual function.
Authors: Philip Toozs-Hobson; Robert Freeman; Matthew Barber; Christopher Maher; Bernard Haylen; Stavros Athanasiou; Steven Swift; Kristene Whitmore; Gamal Ghoniem; Dirk de Ridder Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Catherine S Bradley; Kimberly S Kenton; Holly E Richter; Xin Gao; Halina M Zyczynski; Anne M Weber; Ingrid E Nygaard Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-10-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Simone Dos Reis Brandão da Silveira; Jorge Milhem Haddad; Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jármy-Di Bella; Fernanda Nastri; Miriam Goncalves Markos Kawabata; Silvia da Silva Carramão; Claudinei Alves Rodrigues; Edmund Chada Baracat; Antonio Pedro Flores Auge Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Cássia R T Juliato; Maira F G Mazzer; Juliana M Diniz; Catarina H S Farias; Edilson B de Castro Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.365