BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is considered a major health issue and therefore there is a need for reliable routine tests for measurement of the vitamin in blood samples. Here we present a validation of the recently released Roche 25-OH Vitamin D Total assay (Vitamin D Total). METHODS: We analyzed control materials (2 levels) and patient serum pools (3 levels) ranging from 34 to 123 nmol/L 84 times over a period of 21 days, and we analyzed five serum pools in 10 separate runs to verify the limit of quantification. We also analyzed 53 paired samples of serum and Li-heparin plasma. We evaluated the 25-OH Vitamin D Total assay in comparison to our in-house liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method [194 patient samples without 25-hydroxy vitamin D(2) (25OHD(2)) and 23 patient samples containing 25OHD(2)]. RESULTS: At concentrations of 34 and 56 nmol/L within-run CVs were 4.8% and 1.9% and total CVs were 8.3% and 6.1%. We verified that the limit of quantification was 22.5 nmol/L, as stated by the manufacturer. No significant difference was observed between serum and plasma samples (Li-heparin). Comparison with LC-MS/MS using 194 samples containing 25OHD(3) only (no 25OHD(2)) showed Vitamin D Total nmol/L=1.07×(LC-MS/MS) nmol/L+4.7 nmol/L, whereas comparison of 25OHD(2) using 23 patient samples showed Vitamin D Total nmol/L=0.55×(LC-MS/MS) nmol/L-2.38 nmol/L (Demings regression). CONCLUSIONS: The Roche Vitamin D Total assay is judged suitable for measurement of 25OHD in serum and Li-heparin plasma. Results for 25OHD(3) are comparable to those obtained by LC-MS/MS, while results for 25OHD(2) are around half of those obtained by LC-MS/MS.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D deficiency is considered a major health issue and therefore there is a need for reliable routine tests for measurement of the vitamin in blood samples. Here we present a validation of the recently released Roche 25-OH Vitamin D Total assay (Vitamin D Total). METHODS: We analyzed control materials (2 levels) and patient serum pools (3 levels) ranging from 34 to 123 nmol/L 84 times over a period of 21 days, and we analyzed five serum pools in 10 separate runs to verify the limit of quantification. We also analyzed 53 paired samples of serum and Li-heparin plasma. We evaluated the 25-OH Vitamin D Total assay in comparison to our in-house liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method [194 patient samples without 25-hydroxy vitamin D(2) (25OHD(2)) and 23 patient samples containing 25OHD(2)]. RESULTS: At concentrations of 34 and 56 nmol/L within-run CVs were 4.8% and 1.9% and total CVs were 8.3% and 6.1%. We verified that the limit of quantification was 22.5 nmol/L, as stated by the manufacturer. No significant difference was observed between serum and plasma samples (Li-heparin). Comparison with LC-MS/MS using 194 samples containing 25OHD(3) only (no 25OHD(2)) showed Vitamin D Total nmol/L=1.07×(LC-MS/MS) nmol/L+4.7 nmol/L, whereas comparison of 25OHD(2) using 23 patient samples showed Vitamin D Total nmol/L=0.55×(LC-MS/MS) nmol/L-2.38 nmol/L (Demings regression). CONCLUSIONS: The Roche Vitamin D Total assay is judged suitable for measurement of 25OHD in serum and Li-heparin plasma. Results for 25OHD(3) are comparable to those obtained by LC-MS/MS, while results for 25OHD(2) are around half of those obtained by LC-MS/MS.
Authors: Christopher R Sudfeld; Denise L Jacobson; Noé M Rueda; Daniela Neri; Armando J Mendez; Laurie Butler; Suzanne Siminski; Kristy M Hendricks; Claude A Mellins; Christopher P Duggan; Tracie L Miller Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ewelina A Dziedzic; Jakub S Gąsior; Mariusz Pawłowski; Beata Wodejko-Kucharska; Tomasz Saniewski; Anna Marcisz; Marek J Dąbrowski Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Min-Chul Cho; Jin Hyun Kim; Myeong Hee Jung; In Ae Cho; Hyen Chul Jo; Jeong Kyu Shin; Soon Ae Lee; Won Jun Choi; Jong Hak Lee Journal: Clin Exp Reprod Med Date: 2019-08-13
Authors: E Thiering; I Brüske; J Kratzsch; L C Hofbauer; D Berdel; A von Berg; I Lehmann; B Hoffmann; C P Bauer; S Koletzko; J Heinrich Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 4.379