Literature DB >> 23093240

Comparison of hospital costs and length of stay associated with open-mesh, totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, and transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of observational data using propensity score matching.

Friedrich Wittenbecher1, David Scheller-Kreinsen, Julia Röttger, Reinhard Busse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery is increasingly seen as the superior technique in hernia repair. Compared to open-mesh hernia repair, laparoscopic approaches are often reported to be more cost-effective but incur higher costs for the provider. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of nonincarcerated inguinal hernias in men on hospital costs and length of stay (LoS).
METHODS: We used routine administrative, highly standardized, patient-level cost data from 15 German hospitals participating in the national cost data study. We compared TEP, TAPP, and open-mesh repair. We conducted propensity score matching to account for baseline differences between treatment groups and subsequently estimated the treatment effect on costs and LoS.
RESULTS: Total costs for both TEP and TAPP surgery were significantly lower than those for open-mesh repair (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). TEP repair also had a slight but nonsignificant advantage in total costs compared to TAPP repair, while TAPP surgery was associated with a significantly shorter LoS than TEP (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Results suggest that laparoscopic approaches in hernia repair are not necessarily associated with higher hospital resource consumption than open-mesh repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23093240     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2608-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

Review 1.  A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)].

Authors:  R Bittner; M E Arregui; T Bisgaard; M Dudai; G S Ferzli; R J Fitzgibbons; R H Fortelny; U Klinge; F Kockerling; E Kuhry; J Kukleta; D Lomanto; M C Misra; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; W Reinpold; J Rosenberg; S Sauerland; C Schug-Pass; K Singh; M Timoney; D Weyhe; P Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Long-term cost-minimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; P Carlsson; A Rosenblad; A Montgomery; L Bergkvist; C Rudberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.

Authors:  K McCormack; B Wake; J Perez; C Fraser; J Cook; E McIntosh; L Vale; A Grant
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; C Rudberg; S Smedberg; L K Enander; C E Leijonmarck; J Osterberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Comparison of institutional costs for laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia versus open repair and its reimbursement in an ambulatory surgery center.

Authors:  Volker R Jacobs; John E Morrison
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.719

8.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.

Authors:  N W Scott; K McCormack; P Graham; P M Go; S J Ross; A M Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002
View more
  7 in total

1.  Effectivity of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) in daily clinical practice: early and long-term result.

Authors:  Florian Muschalla; Jochen Schwarz; Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia: our choice of TAPP, why, results and review of literature.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Schwarz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Understanding drivers of hospital charge variation for episodes of care among patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Yuhree Kim; Gaya Spolverato; Ryan Taylor; John Hundt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Synchronous primary colorectal and liver metastasis: impact of operative approach on clinical outcomes and hospital charges.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Eugene Semenov; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Dylan Tanner; John Hundt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  TEP versus TAPP: comparison of the perioperative outcome in 17,587 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Bittner; D A Jacob; L Seidelmann; T Keller; D Adolf; B Kraft; A Kuthe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Inguinal hernia repair with or without mesh in late adolescent males.

Authors:  Sung Hyun Kim; Hong Sung Jung; Sejin Park; Sang Sik Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.