Literature DB >> 23092824

Disease burden and treatment outcomes in second-line therapy of patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer: a review of the literature.

Kimberly A Boswell1, Xufang Wang, Manasee V Shah, Matti S Aapro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the variable burden of disease of patients with advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer and assess the current treatment landscape after failure of first-line endocrine therapy.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed (2000-2011) by searching Medline via PubMed, and Embase and Cochrane databases, to assess disease burden (i.e. societal, humanistic, and/or economic burden) and treatment landscape for second-line therapy of ER+ advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
RESULTS: Only 1 study was identified that evaluated burden of disease based on ER status (ER+, ER-negative, or ER-unknown); this study was a subgroup analysis assessing the impact of breast cancer recurrence over 10 years. The investigators reported that only minor differences in survival and medical costs were noted based on ER status in relapsing patients. Regardless of ER status, patients with breast cancer recurrence consumed more healthcare resources and were associated with more costly care than those without recurrence. A total of 7 studies were identified related to treatment outcomes of second-line therapy in ER+ patients. A combined international population totaled >3800 patients who had progressed on prior hormonal therapy, including tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. Three trials performed a comparative efficacy/safety assessment of an ER antagonist vs. aromatase inhibitor, 1 trial compared an aromatase inhibitor to megestrol acetate, and 1 trial compared 2 aromatase inhibitors. Among each of the studies evaluated, no significant differences were observed in the primary efficacy endpoint, and the safety profiles were similar. Two additional studies demonstrated a similar or better efficacy and safety profile based on different dosing evaluations.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is insufficient evidence on the economic and humanistic burden associated with ER status, and this gap warrants further research. With increasing drug resistance and greater economic burden associated with breast cancer recurrence, there is an unmet medical need for improved treatment in this patient population.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23092824     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  4 in total

1.  The impact of CBP expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Wafaa S Ramadan; Iman M Talaat; Mahmood Y Hachim; Annette Lischka; Timo Gemoll; Raafat El-Awady
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 6.551

2.  Survival, healthcare resource use and costs among stage IV ER + breast cancer patients not receiving HER2 targeted therapy: a retrospective analysis of linked SEER-Medicare data.

Authors:  Kathleen Lang; Huan Huang; Medha Sasane; Victoria Federico Paly; Yanni Hao; Joseph Menzin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Prognostic role of PIK3CA mutations and their association with hormone receptor expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Pang; Shi Cheng; Shi-Peng Sun; Cheng An; Zhi-Yuan Liu; Xue Feng; Gui-Jian Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Treatment patterns and real world clinical outcomes in ER+/HER2- post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer patients in the United States.

Authors:  Giovanni Zanotti; Matthias Hunger; Julia J Perkins; Ruslan Horblyuk; Monique Martin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.