Literature DB >> 23091968

Tattooing regulations in U.S. States, 2011.

Valeria P Carlson1, Everett J Lehman, Myrna Armstrong.   

Abstract

Tattooing's popularity has led to regulatory concerns because medical complications linked to unsanitary practices can have a lasting health impact. The authors' study sought to determine whether existing state tattooing laws and regulations (rules) effectively protect public health. A 10-item checklist was created for each of three types of rules (sanitation, training, and infection control) identified as having the greatest public health impact. State rules were classified as effective if the state scored > or = 7 on all three categories, moderate if > or = 4 in all three categories, minimal if < 4 in one or more categories, and ineffective if < or = 2 in all three categories. Forty-one states have at least one state statute regulating tattooing practice. On the basis of the authors' study criteria, 36 states regulate sanitation effectively; 15 states regulate training effectively; and 26 states regulate infection control effectively. Fourteen states meet the criteria for regulating all three categories effectively. Specific rules vary substantially by state. Public health agencies should encourage states to adopt and enforce effective, evidence-based tattooing rules.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23091968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health        ISSN: 0022-0892            Impact factor:   1.179


  2 in total

1.  Tattooing complicated by multivalvular bacterial endocarditis.

Authors:  N I Akkus; G S Mina; S Fereidoon; S Rajpal
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  A Scan of CDC-Authored Articles on Legal Epidemiology, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Leila Martini; David Presley; Sarah Klieger; Scott Burris
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.792

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.