Literature DB >> 23091779

Levels of evidence in medicine.

Peter McNair1, Gwyn Lewis.   

Abstract

Levels of evidence allow clinicians to appreciate the quality of a particular research paper quickly. The levels are generally set out in a hierarchical order, which is based largely upon the experimental design. While there are ideal designs for studies examining the effects of interventions, risk factors for a clinical condition or diagnostic testing, in most instances researchers have had to make compromises and these subsequently decrease the quality of their work. This paper provides information concerning how those compromises relate to subsequent levels that are given to a piece of research. It also provides an understanding of issues related to evaluating papers, and suggest ways in which the reader might discern how relevant a paper might be to one's clinical practice.

Keywords:  levels of evidence; research design; study quality

Year:  2012        PMID: 23091779      PMCID: PMC3474306     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  16 in total

1.  In defense of case reports and case series.

Authors:  J P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective.

Authors:  J M Fritz; R S Wainner
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-09

Review 3.  Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies.

Authors:  C J Mann
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

Review 5.  Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force.

Authors:  Gordon Guyatt; David Gutterman; Michael H Baumann; Doreen Addrizzo-Harris; Elaine M Hylek; Barbara Phillips; Gary Raskob; Sandra Zelman Lewis; Holger Schünemann
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  D C Hadorn; D Baker; J S Hodges; N Hicks
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Choosing the best research design for each question.

Authors:  D L Sackett; J E Wennberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997 Dec 20-27

8.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; R B Haynes; R Z Jaeschke; D J Cook; L Green; C D Naylor; M C Wilson; W S Richardson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Decision aids for cancer survivors' engagement with survivorship care services after primary treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yu Ke; Hanzhang Zhou; Raymond Javan Chan; Alexandre Chan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment for essential tremor shows sustained efficacy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  William K Miller; Kathryn N Becker; Andrew J Caras; Tarek R Mansour; Malik T Mays; Mehmood Rashid; Jason Schwalb
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Knee Joint Distraction as Treatment for Osteoarthritis Results in Clinical and Structural Benefit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Limited Number of Studies and Patients Available.

Authors:  Mylène P Jansen; Tim A E J Boymans; Roel J H Custers; Rutger C I Van Geenen; Ronald J Van Heerwaarden; Maarten R Huizinga; Jorm M Nellensteijn; Rob Sollie; Sander Spruijt; Simon C Mastbergen
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Factors associated with spoken language comprehension in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emma Vaillant; Johanna J M Geytenbeek; Elise P Jansma; Kim J Oostrom; R Jeroen Vermeulen; Annemieke I Buizer
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 5.  A systematic review of the physical activity levels of acutely ill older adults in Hospital At Home settings: an under-researched field.

Authors:  Jennifer Scott; Ukachukwu O Abaraogu; Graham Ellis; Maria Giné-Garriga; Dawn A Skelton
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  The association between self-efficacy and self-care in essential hypertension: a systematic review.

Authors:  Felicia Clara Jun Hui Tan; Prawira Oka; Hajira Dambha-Miller; Ngiap Chuan Tan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 7.  COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in Workplace Settings: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Carolyn Ingram; Vicky Downey; Mark Roe; Yanbing Chen; Mary Archibald; Kadri-Ann Kallas; Jaspal Kumar; Peter Naughton; Cyril Onwuelazu Uteh; Alejandro Rojas-Chaves; Shibu Shrestha; Shiraz Syed; Fionn Cléirigh Büttner; Conor Buggy; Carla Perrotta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.