PURPOSE: To identify the criteria for hematologic and cardiac response to treatment in immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis based on survival analysis of a large patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We gathered for analysis 816 patients with AL amyloidosis from seven referral centers in the European Union and the United States. A different cohort of 374 patients prospectively evaluated at the Pavia Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center was used for validation. Data was available for all patients before and 3 and/or 6 months after initiation of first-line therapy. The prognostic relevance of different criteria for hematologic and cardiac response was assessed. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the extent of reduction of amyloidogenic free light chains (FLCs) and improvement in survival. This allowed the identification of four levels of response: amyloid complete response (normal FLC ratio and negative serum and urine immunofixation), very good partial response (difference between involved and uninvolved FLCs [dFLC] < 40 mg/L), partial response (dFLC decrease > 50%), and no response. Cardiac involvement is the major determinant of survival, and changes in cardiac function after therapy can be reliably assessed using the cardiac biomarker N-terminal natriuretic peptide type B (NT-proBNP). Changes in FLC and NT-proBNP predicted survival as early as 3 months after treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: This study identifies and validates new criteria for response to first-line treatment in AL amyloidosis, based on their association with survival in large patient populations, and offers surrogate end points for clinical trials.
PURPOSE: To identify the criteria for hematologic and cardiac response to treatment in immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis based on survival analysis of a large patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We gathered for analysis 816 patients with AL amyloidosis from seven referral centers in the European Union and the United States. A different cohort of 374 patients prospectively evaluated at the Pavia Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center was used for validation. Data was available for all patients before and 3 and/or 6 months after initiation of first-line therapy. The prognostic relevance of different criteria for hematologic and cardiac response was assessed. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the extent of reduction of amyloidogenic free light chains (FLCs) and improvement in survival. This allowed the identification of four levels of response: amyloid complete response (normal FLC ratio and negative serum and urine immunofixation), very good partial response (difference between involved and uninvolved FLCs [dFLC] < 40 mg/L), partial response (dFLC decrease > 50%), and no response. Cardiac involvement is the major determinant of survival, and changes in cardiac function after therapy can be reliably assessed using the cardiac biomarker N-terminal natriuretic peptide type B (NT-proBNP). Changes in FLC and NT-proBNP predicted survival as early as 3 months after treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: This study identifies and validates new criteria for response to first-line treatment in AL amyloidosis, based on their association with survival in large patient populations, and offers surrogate end points for clinical trials.
Authors: A M Cornelison; R M Saliba; A Afrough; Y Dinh; Y Nieto; Q Bashir; N Shah; S Parmar; C Hosing; U Popat; E Shpall; R Champlin; M H Qazilbash Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: S Hong; J Valent; L Rybicki; D Abounader; B Bolwell; R Dean; A T Gerds; D Jagadeesh; B K Hamilton; B Hill; M E Kalaycio; B Pohlman; F Reu; C Samaras; R Sobecks; N S Majhail; H D Liu Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: M Vignon; V Javaugue; M P Alexander; K El-Karoui; A Karras; D Roos-Weil; B Royer; B Asli; B Knebelmann; G Touchard; A Jaccard; B Arnulf; F Bridoux; N Leung; J P Fermand Journal: Leukemia Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Bouke P C Hazenberg; Alexandra Croockewit; Bronno van der Holt; Sonja Zweegman; Gerard M J Bos; Michel Delforge; Reinier A P Raymakers; Pieter Sonneveld; Edo Vellenga; Pierre W Wijermans; Peter A von dem Borne; Marinus H van Oers; Okke de Weerdt; Fokje M Spoelstra; Henk M Lokhorst Journal: Haematologica Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Abdullah S Al Saleh; M Hasib Sidiqi; Eli Muchtar; Angela Dispenzieri; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Martha Q Lacy; Rahma M Warsame; Wilson I Gonsalves; Taxiarchis V Kourelis; William J Hogan; Suzanne R Hayman; Prashant Kapoor; Shaji K Kumar; Morie A Gertz Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Giovanni Palladini; Efstathios Kastritis; Mathew S Maurer; Jeffrey Zonder; Monique C Minnema; Ashutosh D Wechalekar; Arnaud Jaccard; Hans C Lee; Naresh Bumma; Jonathan L Kaufman; Eva Medvedova; Tibor Kovacsovics; Michael Rosenzweig; Vaishali Sanchorawala; Xiang Qin; Sandra Y Vasey; Brendan M Weiss; Jessica Vermeulen; Giampaolo Merlini; Raymond L Comenzo Journal: Blood Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 22.113