Literature DB >> 23090229

Muscular static strength test performance: comparison between normotensive and hypertensive workers.

Timothy Gustavo Cavazzotto1, Luriam Tratis, Sandra Aires Ferreira, Rômulo Araújo Fernandes, Marcos Roberto Queiroga.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare static muscular strength test performance between hypertensive and normotensive workers, considering the hypothesis that hypertensive individuals have lower strength than normotensive individuals.
METHODS: The participants consisted of 354 workers (246 men and 108 women) who underwent height, body mass, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) measurements, as well as right and left handgrip, and scapular and lumbar strength tests. Assessments were performed during three days in all three shifts, with workers from a candy and sweets factory located in Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. BP measurements were performed with a 10-minute interval, with the subject in the sitting position. Before the strength tests were performed, the workers were familiarized with the equipment; the highest value was recorded after two attempts at each test.
RESULTS: The results showed significant differences between hypertensive and normotensive individuals for age, body mass, body mass index, and waist circumference greater for hypertensive individuals. Regarding static muscle strength tests performance, the hypertensive individuals did not differ significantly from normotensive individuals; however, this difference was observed when groups divided by body mass index (BMI) were compared. The obesity group had strength values above those of the normal weight/overweight group among normotensive individuals, but this was not observed among the hypertensive individuals. As for the intragender comparison, there were no significant differences for the strength tests.
CONCLUSION: Normotensive and hypertensive workers showed no significant differences in the performance of static muscular strength tests; however, body mass and gender seem to affect the association between muscle strength and blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23090229     DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302012000500015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)        ISSN: 0104-4230            Impact factor:   1.209


  4 in total

1.  Strength indicators and usual physical activity among university administrative employees.

Authors:  Vinícius Muller Reis Weber; Marcos Roberto Queiroga; André Luiz Kiihn; Luiz Augusto da-Silva; Sandra Aires Ferreira; Bruno Sergio Portela
Journal:  Rev Bras Med Trab       Date:  2020-01-09

2.  Klapp method effect on idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Diego De Sousa Dantas; Sanderson José Costa De Assis; Marina Pegoraro Baroni; Johnnatas Mikael Lopes; Enio Walker Azevedo Cacho; Roberta De Oliveira Cacho; Silvana Alves Pereira
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-01-30

3.  Higher Abdominal Adiposity Is Associated With Lower Muscle Strength in Chilean Adults.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Palacio; Ximena Díaz-Torrente; Daiana Quintiliano-Scarpelli
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-23

4.  Relative Handgrip Strength as a Simple Tool to Evaluate Impaired Heart Rate Recovery and a Low Chronotropic Index in Obese Older Women.

Authors:  Cristiane R Silva; Bruno Saraiva; Dahan D C Nascimento; Samuel C Oliveira; Ivo Sousa Neto; Renato Valduga; Nayara G Santos; Ramires A Tibana; Jonato Prestes; Jeffrey M Willardson; Guilherme B Pereira
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.