PURPOSE: Controlled cortical impact (CCI) is commonly used in adult animals to study focal traumatic brain injury (TBI). Our study aims to further study injury mechanisms in children and variable models of pathology in the developing brain. METHODS: Develop a focal injury model of experimental TBI in the immature, postnatal days (PND) 7 and 17 rats that underwent a CCI at varying depths of deflection, 1.5-2.5 mm compared with sham and then tested using the Morris water maze (MWM) beginning on post-injury day (PID) 11. Histopathologic analysis was performed at PID 1 and 28. RESULTS: In PND 7, the 1.75- and 2.0-mm deflections (diameter (d) = 3 mm; velocity = 4 m/s; and duration = 500 ms) resulted in significant MWM deficits while the 1.5-mm injury did not produce MWM deficits vs. sham controls. In PND 17, all injury levels resulted in significant MWM deficits vs. sham controls with a graded response; the 1.5-mm deflection (d = 6 mm; velocity = 4 m/s; and duration = 500 ms) produced significantly less deficits as compared WITH the 2.0- and 2.5-mm injuries. Histologically, a graded injury response was also seen in both ages at injury with cortical and more severe injuries, hippocampal damage. Cortical contusion volume increased in most injury severities from PID 1 to 28 in both ages at injury while hippocampal volumes subsequently decreased. CONCLUSIONS: CCI in PND 7 and 17 rat results in significant MWM deficits and cortical histopathology providing two different and unique experimental models of TBI in immature rats that may be useful in further investigations into the mechanisms and treatments of pediatric TBI.
PURPOSE: Controlled cortical impact (CCI) is commonly used in adult animals to study focal traumatic brain injury (TBI). Our study aims to further study injury mechanisms in children and variable models of pathology in the developing brain. METHODS: Develop a focal injury model of experimental TBI in the immature, postnatal days (PND) 7 and 17 rats that underwent a CCI at varying depths of deflection, 1.5-2.5 mm compared with sham and then tested using the Morris water maze (MWM) beginning on post-injury day (PID) 11. Histopathologic analysis was performed at PID 1 and 28. RESULTS: In PND 7, the 1.75- and 2.0-mm deflections (diameter (d) = 3 mm; velocity = 4 m/s; and duration = 500 ms) resulted in significant MWM deficits while the 1.5-mm injury did not produce MWM deficits vs. sham controls. In PND 17, all injury levels resulted in significant MWM deficits vs. sham controls with a graded response; the 1.5-mm deflection (d = 6 mm; velocity = 4 m/s; and duration = 500 ms) produced significantly less deficits as compared WITH the 2.0- and 2.5-mm injuries. Histologically, a graded injury response was also seen in both ages at injury with cortical and more severe injuries, hippocampal damage. Cortical contusion volume increased in most injury severities from PID 1 to 28 in both ages at injury while hippocampal volumes subsequently decreased. CONCLUSIONS:CCI in PND 7 and 17 rat results in significant MWM deficits and cortical histopathology providing two different and unique experimental models of TBI in immature rats that may be useful in further investigations into the mechanisms and treatments of pediatric TBI.
Authors: C Ikonomidou; F Bosch; M Miksa; P Bittigau; J Vöckler; K Dikranian; T I Tenkova; V Stefovska; L Turski; J W Olney Journal: Science Date: 1999-01-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Patrick M Kochanek; Nancy Carney; P David Adelson; Stephen Ashwal; Michael J Bell; Susan Bratton; Susan Carson; Randall M Chesnut; Jamshid Ghajar; Brahm Goldstein; Gerald A Grant; Niranjan Kissoon; Kimberly Peterson; Nathan R Selden; Robert C Tasker; Karen A Tong; Monica S Vavilala; Mark S Wainwright; Craig R Warden Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Ericka L Fink; Henry Alexander; Christina D Marco; C Edward Dixon; Patrick M Kochanek; Larry W Jenkins; Yichen Lai; Holly A Donovan; Robert W Hickey; Robert S Clark Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Michelle E Schober; Daniela F Requena; J Alan Maschek; James Cox; Leonardo Parra; Alyssa Lolofie Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2019-10-13 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Ryan C Turner; Reyna L VanGilder; Zachary J Naser; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Julian E Bailes; Rae R Matsumoto; Jason D Huber; Charles L Rosen Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Elizabeth Newell; David K Shellington; Dennis W Simon; Michael J Bell; Patrick M Kochanek; Keri Feldman; Hülya Bayir; Rajesh K Aneja; Joseph A Carcillo; Robert S B Clark Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Shenandoah Robinson; Jesse L Winer; Justin Berkner; Lindsay A S Chan; Jesse L Denson; Jessie R Maxwell; Yirong Yang; Laurel O Sillerud; Robert C Tasker; William P Meehan; Rebekah Mannix; Lauren L Jantzie Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Joel E Kamper; Viorela Pop; Andrew M Fukuda; David O Ajao; Richard E Hartman; Jérôme Badaut Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Michelle E Schober; Daniela F Requena; Osama M Abdullah; T Charles Casper; Joanna Beachy; Daniel Malleske; James R Pauly Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 5.269