Literature DB >> 23089460

Volumetric staging in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with definitive IMRT.

Gabriela Studer1, Christoph Glanzmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The superiority of volumetric staging (VS) over TNM/TNM-grouping system was previously prospectively tested in our head neck cancer population treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT); gross tumor volume (GTV) was the strongest predictor for disease control. Aim of this work was to specifically assess the prognostic value of VS in oropharyngeal cancer (OC). PATIENTS: Between 04/2002 and 12/2011, 277 consecutive OC patients underwent definitive IMRT. Mean/median follow-up was 33/27 months (3-113). Three volumetric cut-offs were used (resulting in 4 GTV subgroups: 1-15 cc (14%), 16-70 cc (62%), 71-130 cc (20%), >130 cc (4%)).
METHODS: Outcome in the OC subgroup was prospectively assessed with VS and compared with that resulting from TNM and AJCC staging.
RESULTS: Primary GTV was most reliably predicting local control (p<0.0001), all other outcome parameters were predicted best by the total GTV (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: This is -to our knowledge- the first volumetric staging system for OC, and was found to be most reliable in predicting outcome in OC patients treated with IMRT.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23089460     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  8 in total

1.  Primary tumor volume and prognosis for patients with p16-positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gabriel Adrian; Henrik Carlsson; Elisabeth Kjellén; Johanna Sjövall; Björn Zackrisson; Per Nilsson; Maria Gebre-Medhin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.309

Review 2.  Does Tumor Volume Have a Prognostic Role in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Elena Russo; Remo Accorona; Oreste Iocca; Andrea Costantino; Luca Malvezzi; Fabio Ferreli; Ciro Franzese; Marta Scorsetti; Pasquale Capaccio; Giuseppe Mercante; Giuseppe Spriano; Armando De Virgilio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Predictive and prognostic factors for patients with locoregionally advanced laryngeal carcinoma treated with surgical multimodality protocol.

Authors:  Gorkem Eskiizmir; Gokce Tanyeri Toker; Onur Celik; Kivanc Gunhan; Ayca Tan; Hulya Ellidokuz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Race disparities attributed to volumetric tumor burden in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Muhammad M Qureshi; Paul B Romesser; Abdallah Ajani; Lisa A Kachnic; Scharukh Jalisi; Minh Tam Truong
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Volumetric stratification of cT4 stage head and neck cancer.

Authors:  G Studer; C Glanzmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  The role of tumor volume in radiotherapy of patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz Rutkowski
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Risk profile for osteoradionecrosis of the mandible in the IMRT era.

Authors:  Gabriela Studer; Marius Bredell; Stephan Studer; Gerhard Huber; Christoph Glanzmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio complements volumetric staging as prognostic factor in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Cédric Panje; Oliver Riesterer; Christoph Glanzmann; Gabriela Studer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.