STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe the incidence and types of medical errors in emergency departments (EDs) and assess the validity of a survey instrument that identifies systems factors contributing to errors in EDs. METHODS: We conducted the National Emergency Department Safety Study in 62 urban EDs across 20 US states. We reviewed 9,821 medical records of ED patients with one of 3 conditions (myocardial infarction, asthma exacerbation, and joint dislocation) to evaluate medical errors. We also obtained surveys from 3,562 staff randomly selected from each ED; survey data were used to calculate average safety climate scores for each ED. RESULTS: We identified 402 adverse events (incidence rate 4.1 per 100 patient visits; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7 to 4.5) and 532 near misses (incidence rate 5.4 per 100 patient visits; 95% CI 5.0 to 5.9). We judged 37% of the adverse events, and all of the near misses, to be preventable (errors); 33% of the near misses were intercepted. In multivariable models, better ED safety climate was not associated with fewer preventable adverse events (incidence rate ratio per 0.2-point increase in ED safety score 0.82; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.16) but was associated with more intercepted near misses (incidence rate ratio 1.79; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.03). We found no association between safety climate and violations of national treatment guidelines. CONCLUSION: Among the 3 ED conditions studied, medical errors are relatively common, and one third of adverse events are preventable. Improved ED safety climate may increase the likelihood that near misses are intercepted.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe the incidence and types of medical errors in emergency departments (EDs) and assess the validity of a survey instrument that identifies systems factors contributing to errors in EDs. METHODS: We conducted the National Emergency Department Safety Study in 62 urban EDs across 20 US states. We reviewed 9,821 medical records of ED patients with one of 3 conditions (myocardial infarction, asthma exacerbation, and joint dislocation) to evaluate medical errors. We also obtained surveys from 3,562 staff randomly selected from each ED; survey data were used to calculate average safety climate scores for each ED. RESULTS: We identified 402 adverse events (incidence rate 4.1 per 100 patient visits; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7 to 4.5) and 532 near misses (incidence rate 5.4 per 100 patient visits; 95% CI 5.0 to 5.9). We judged 37% of the adverse events, and all of the near misses, to be preventable (errors); 33% of the near misses were intercepted. In multivariable models, better ED safety climate was not associated with fewer preventable adverse events (incidence rate ratio per 0.2-point increase in ED safety score 0.82; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.16) but was associated with more intercepted near misses (incidence rate ratio 1.79; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.03). We found no association between safety climate and violations of national treatment guidelines. CONCLUSION: Among the 3 ED conditions studied, medical errors are relatively common, and one third of adverse events are preventable. Improved ED safety climate may increase the likelihood that near misses are intercepted.
Authors: Yonathan Freund; Alexandra Rousseau; Laurence Berard; Helene Goulet; Patrick Ray; Benjamin Bloom; Tabassome Simon; Bruno Riou Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2015-09-04
Authors: Hélène Goulet; Victor Guerand; Benjamin Bloom; Patricia Martel; Philippe Aegerter; Enrique Casalino; Bruno Riou; Yonathan Freund Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Ryan M Schneider; Brian R Sharp; Jeff Pothof; Marie C Vrablik; Nic Granzella; Alexandre A Todorov; Lee Adler Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 2.844
Authors: José Antonio Lozano-Lozano; Salvador Chacón-Moscoso; Susana Sanduvete-Chaves; Francisco Pablo Holgado-Tello Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alissa L Russ; Rollin J Fairbanks; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Laura G Militello; Jason J Saleem; Robert L Wears Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Richard M Ruddy; James M Chamberlain; Prashant V Mahajan; Tomohiko Funai; Karen J O'Connell; Stephen Blumberg; Richard Lichenstein; Heather L Gramse; Kathy N Shaw Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Zach K Jepson; Chad E Darling; Kevin A Kotkowski; Steven B Bird; Michael W Arce; Gregory A Volturo; Martin A Reznek Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2014-08-08