PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and CT imaging features of goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) neoplasm of the appendix. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computer search of pathology and radiology records over a 19-year period at our two institutions was performed using the search string "goblet". In the patients with appendiceal GCC neoplasms who had abdominopelvic CT, imaging findings were categorized, blinded to gross and surgical description, as: "Appendicitis", "Prominent appendix without peri-appendiceal infiltration", "Mass" or "Normal appendix". The CT appearance was correlated with an accepted pathological classification of: low grade GCC, signet ring cell adenocarcinoma ex, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma ex GCC group. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (age range, 28-80 years; mean age, 52 years; 15 female, 12 male) with pathology-proven appendiceal GCC neoplasm had CT scans that were reviewed. Patients presented with acute appendicitis (n=12), abdominal pain not typical for appendicitis (n=14) and incidental finding (n=1). CT imaging showed 9 Appendicitis, 9 Prominent appendices without peri-appendiceal infiltration, 7 Masses and 2 Normal appendices. Appendicitis (8/9) usually correlated with typical low grade GCC on pathology. In contrast, the majority of Masses and Prominent Appendices without peri-appendiceal infiltration were pathologically confirmed to be signet ring cell adenocarcinoma ex GCC. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma ex GCC was seen in only a small minority of patients. Hyperattenuation of the appendiceal neoplasm was seen in a majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: GCC neoplasm of the appendix should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients with primary appendiceal malignancy. Our cases demonstrated close correlation between our predefined CT pattern and the pathological classification.
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and CT imaging features of goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) neoplasm of the appendix. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computer search of pathology and radiology records over a 19-year period at our two institutions was performed using the search string "goblet". In the patients with appendiceal GCC neoplasms who had abdominopelvic CT, imaging findings were categorized, blinded to gross and surgical description, as: "Appendicitis", "Prominent appendix without peri-appendiceal infiltration", "Mass" or "Normal appendix". The CT appearance was correlated with an accepted pathological classification of: low grade GCC, signet ring cell adenocarcinoma ex, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma ex GCC group. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (age range, 28-80 years; mean age, 52 years; 15 female, 12 male) with pathology-proven appendiceal GCC neoplasm had CT scans that were reviewed. Patients presented with acute appendicitis (n=12), abdominal pain not typical for appendicitis (n=14) and incidental finding (n=1). CT imaging showed 9 Appendicitis, 9 Prominent appendices without peri-appendiceal infiltration, 7 Masses and 2 Normal appendices. Appendicitis (8/9) usually correlated with typical low grade GCC on pathology. In contrast, the majority of Masses and Prominent Appendices without peri-appendiceal infiltration were pathologically confirmed to be signet ring cell adenocarcinoma ex GCC. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma ex GCC was seen in only a small minority of patients. Hyperattenuation of the appendiceal neoplasm was seen in a majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: GCC neoplasm of the appendix should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients with primary appendiceal malignancy. Our cases demonstrated close correlation between our predefined CT pattern and the pathological classification.
Authors: M I Prieto-Nieto; D Pastor; J Rodríguez-Cobos; J P Pérez; C Méndez; E Palacios; M Arranz-Alvarez; J Santos-López; M Cano-Vega; D Viñal; N Rodríguez; G Domínguez Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Dianne Grunes; Michelle Kang Kim; David B Chessin; Rona D Yaeger; Stephen C Ward Journal: Int J Surg Pathol Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 1.271
Authors: Michelle D Reid; Olca Basturk; Walid L Shaib; Yue Xue; Serdar Balci; Hye-Jeong Choi; Gizem Akkas; Bahar Memis; Brian S Robinson; Bassel F El-Rayes; Charles A Staley; Christopher A Staley; Joshua H Winer; Maria C Russell; Jessica H Knight; Michael Goodman; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Volkan Adsay Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Ingrid Holst Olsen; Nanna Holt; Seppo W Langer; Jane P Hasselby; Henning Grønbæk; Jens Hillingsø; Masti Mahmoud; Morten Ladekarl; Lene H Iversen; Andreas Kjær; Birgitte H Federspiel; Ulrich Knigge Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kieran Palmer; Scott Weerasuriya; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Brian Rous; Benjamin E White; Sangeeta Paisey; Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan; John K Ramage Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 5.738