Literature DB >> 23088676

Bone tissue engineering with periosteal-free graft and pedicle omentum.

Amin Bigham-Sadegh1, Ahmad Oryan, Pezhman Mirshokraei, Mohamad Shadkhast, Ehsan Basiri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The histological characteristics of periosteum make it a specific tissue with a unique capacity to be engineered. Higher flexibility of the greater omentum is useful for reconstructive surgery as it facilitates not only filling of the site of infections such as myelitis, but also is effective in filling complicated defects of the soft and hard tissues, and these criteria make it suitable for tissue engineering. The present study was designed to evaluate bone tissue engineering with periosteal-free graft concurrent with pedicle omentum and compare it with subcuticular periosteal grafting in a dog model. This is the first report in which periosteum-free graft has been used as bone tissue engineering.
METHODS: Eight young female indigenous dogs were used in this experiment. In omental group (n = 4), end of omentum was wrapped by periosteum of the radial bone in the abdomen of each dog, while in the subcutaneous group (n = 4), the harvested periosteum was sutured on the subcutaneous layer. Lateral view radiographs were taken from the abdominal cavity post-operatively at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks post surgery. Eight weeks after operation, the dogs were re-anaesthetized and the omental or subcutical grafted periosteom was found and removed for histopathological evaluation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Radiological, gross and histopathological evaluations revealed a superior bone formation in the wrapped omentum with periosteum compared with that of the subcuticular periosteal grafting. This is a novel and efficient technique in producing mature trabecular bone and could be used as a potential source of bone tissue engineering for autotransplantation.
© 2012 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2012 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088676     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06316.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Iran: Current State of Research and Future Outlook.

Authors:  Sahba Mobini; Manijeh Khanmohammadi; Hamed Heidari-Vala; Ali Samadikuchaksaraei; Ali Moshiri; Somaieh Kazemnejad
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Basic concepts regarding fracture healing and the current options and future directions in managing bone fractures.

Authors:  Amin Bigham-Sadegh; Ahmad Oryan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  [Implantation strategy of tissue-engineered liver based on decellularized spleen matrix in rats].

Authors:  Peng Liu; Jun-Xi Xiang; Xing-Long Zheng; Jing-Bo Su; Ding-Hui Dong; Li-Fei Yang; Yi Lv
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-06-20

4.  Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone Reparative Potential.

Authors:  A G Abu-Shahba; T Wilkman; R Kornilov; M Adam; K M Salla; J Lindén; A K Lappalainen; R Björkstrand; R Seppänen-Kaijansinkko; B Mannerström
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 5.  Bone Graft Prefabrication Following the In Vivo Bioreactor Principle.

Authors:  Ru-Lin Huang; Eiji Kobayashi; Kai Liu; Qingfeng Li
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 8.143

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.