Literature DB >> 23088573

The Bayesian evaluation of categorization models: comment on Wills and Pothos (2012).

Wolf Vanpaemel1, Michael D Lee.   

Abstract

Wills and Pothos (2012) reviewed approaches to evaluating formal models of categorization, raising a series of worthwhile issues, challenges, and goals. Unfortunately, in discussing these issues and proposing solutions, Wills and Pothos (2012) did not consider Bayesian methods in any detail. This means not only that their review excludes a major body of current work in the field, but also that it does not consider the body of work that provides the best current answers to the issues raised. In this comment, we argue that Bayesian methods can be--and, in most cases, already have been--applied to all the major model evaluation issues raised by Wills and Pothos (2012). In particular, Bayesian methods can address the challenges of avoiding overfitting, considering qualitative properties of data, reducing dependence on free parameters, and testing empirical breadth.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088573     DOI: 10.1037/a0028551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  2 in total

Review 1.  Using priors to formalize theory: optimal attention and the generalized context model.

Authors:  Wolf Vanpaemel; Michael D Lee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

2.  Using parameter space partitioning to evaluate a model's qualitative fit.

Authors:  Sara Steegen; Francis Tuerlinckx; Wolf Vanpaemel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.