Literature DB >> 23088543

More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch.

Cai S Longman1, Aureliu Lavric, Stephen Monsell.   

Abstract

Switching tasks prolongs response times, an effect reduced but not eliminated by active preparation. To explore the role of attentional selection of the relevant stimulus attribute in these task-switch costs, we measured eye fixations in participants cued to identify either a face or a letter displayed on its forehead. With only 200 ms between cue and stimulus onsets, the eyes fixated the currently relevant region of the stimulus less and the irrelevant region more on switch than on repeat trials, at stimulus onset and for 500 ms thereafter, in a pattern suggestive of delayed orientation of attention to the relevant region on switch trials. With 800 ms to prepare, both switch costs and inappropriate fixations were reduced, but on switch trials participants still tended (relative to repeat trials) to fixate the now-irrelevant region more at stimulus onset and to maintain fixation on, or refixate, the irrelevant region more during the next 500 ms. The size of this attentional persistence was associated with differences in performance costs between and within participants. We suggest that reorientation of attention is an important, albeit somewhat neglected and controversial, component of advance task-set reconfiguration and that the task-set inertia (or reactivation) to which many attribute the residual task-switch cost seen after preparation includes inertia in (or reactivation of) attentional parameters. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088543     DOI: 10.1037/a0030409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

1.  Beta and Theta Oscillations Differentially Support Free Versus Forced Control over Multiple-Target Search.

Authors:  Joram van Driel; Eduard Ort; Johannes J Fahrenfort; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dynamics of task-set carry-over: evidence from eye-movement analyses.

Authors:  Atsushi Kikumoto; Jason Hubbard; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  Direct real-time neural evidence for task-set inertia.

Authors:  Lisa H Evans; Jane E Herron; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-01-27

4.  Proactive inhibitory control: A general biasing account.

Authors:  Heike Elchlepp; Aureliu Lavric; Christopher D Chambers; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  S Stuart; D Hunt; J Nell; A Godfrey; J M Hausdorff; L Rochester; L Alcock
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Adoption of Task-Specific Sets of Visual Attention.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Svantje T Kähler; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-09

7.  The SwAD-Task - An Innovative Paradigm for Measuring Costs of Switching Between Different Attentional Demands.

Authors:  Magnus Liebherr; Stephanie Antons; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.