Literature DB >> 23088489

Process benchmarking appraisal of surgical decompression of spinal cord following traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: opportunities to reduce delays in surgical management.

Julio C Furlan1, Kayee Tung, Michael G Fehlings.   

Abstract

Prior pre-clinical and clinical studies indicate that early decompression of the spinal cord (≤ 24 h post-trauma) may have benefits regarding clinical outcomes and neurological recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI). This study examines the benchmarking of management of patients with acute traumatic cervical SCI in order to determine the potential barriers and ideal timelines for each step to early surgical decompression. We reviewed patient charts and the Surgical Trial in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS) forms regarding the time and reasons for delay of each step in the management of patients with SCI. The reasons for delays were classified into: 1) health care-related ("extrinsic") factors and 2) patient-related ("intrinsic") factors. The cases were grouped into patients who underwent early surgical decompression of spinal cord (early-surgery group) and individuals who underwent later decompression (later-surgery group). Whereas both groups showed comparable time periods related to intrinsic factors, patients in the early surgery group had a significantly shorter time period associated with extrinsic factors when compared with the later surgery group. Both groups were comparable regarding pre-hospital time, time in a second general hospital prior to transfer to a spine center, and time in the trauma emergency department. Patients in the early surgery group had a significantly shorter waiting time, shorter waiting time for assessment by a spine surgeon, and a shorter waiting time for a surgical decision than did the later surgery group. Our benchmarking analysis suggests that health-related factors are key determinants of the timing from SCI to spinal cord decompression. Time in the general hospital and time of waiting for a surgical decision were the most important causes of delay of surgical spinal cord decompression. Early surgery is possible in the vast majority of the cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23088489     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  13 in total

1.  The impact of a specialized spinal cord injury center as compared with non-specialized centers on the acute respiratory management of patients with complete tetraplegia: an observational study.

Authors:  Andréane Richard-Denis; Debbie Feldman; Cynthia Thompson; Martin Albert; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Is there any gender or age-related discrepancy in the waiting time for each step in the surgical management of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury?

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; B Catharine Craven; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a Strong Predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion Following Decompressive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Charles A Sansur; David M Ibrahimi; J Marc Simard; David S Hersh; Elizabeth Le; Cara Diaz; Jennifer Massetti; Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  An analysis of ideal and actual time to surgery after traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada.

Authors:  R A Glennie; C S Bailey; E C Tsai; V K Noonan; C S Rivers; D R Fourney; H Ahn; B K Kwon; J Paquet; B Drew; M G Fehlings; N Attabib; S D Christie; J Finkelstein; R J Hurlbert; S Parent; M F Dvorak
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Surgical management of patients following traumatic spinal cord injury: Identifying barriers to early surgery in a specialized spinal cord injury center.

Authors:  Cynthia Thompson; Debbie E Feldman; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Efficacy of a metalloproteinase inhibitor in spinal cord injured dogs.

Authors:  Jonathan M Levine; Noah D Cohen; Michael Heller; Virginia R Fajt; Gwendolyn J Levine; Sharon C Kerwin; Alpa A Trivedi; Thomas M Fandel; Zena Werb; Augusta Modestino; Linda J Noble-Haeusslein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Geomapping of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Canada and Factors Related to Triage Pattern.

Authors:  Christiana L Cheng; Vanessa K Noonan; Jayson Shurgold; Jason Chen; Carly S Rivers; Hamid Khaleghi Hamedani; Suzanne Humphreys; Christopher S Bailey; Najmedden Attabib; Jean-Marc Mac Thiong; Michael Goytan; Jerome Paquet; Richard Fox; Henry Ahn; Brian K Kwon; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Early versus late spinal decompression surgery in treatment of traumatic spinal cord injuries; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mahmoud Yousefifard; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Masoud Baikpour; Parisa Ghelichkhani; Mostafa Hosseini; AliMoghadas Jafari; Heidar Aziznejad; Abbas Tafakhori
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01-11

9.  Intrathecal decompression versus epidural decompression in the treatment of severe spinal cord injury in rat model: a randomized, controlled preclinical research.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Huili Wang; Chenggang Zhang; Weiguang Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Zinc Concentration Dynamics Indicate Neurological Impairment Odds after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Raban Arved Heller; André Sperl; Julian Seelig; Patrick Haubruck; Tobias Bock; Theresa Werner; Albert Besseling; Qian Sun; Lutz Schomburg; Arash Moghaddam; Bahram Biglari
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.