Literature DB >> 23088488

Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing.

Katherine A Rawson1, John Dunlosky.   

Abstract

The literature on spacing effects is vast, but no prior research has examined the effects of initial spacing when students learn to criterion and then subsequently relearn items. In addition, minimal research has evaluated the costs associated with spaced practice as well as the benefits. Accordingly, in the current research, we examined the benefits and costs of initial spacing using Bahrick's (1979) method of successive relearning. Across 3 experiments, 567 students practiced key term definitions via test-restudy practice until items were correctly recalled 1 or 3 times during initial learning. Practice trials during initial learning were either massed or spaced (including relatively longer lags in all experiments as well as intermediate lags in Experiment 1). All students then relearned items in 2-3 subsequent relearning sessions (across experiments, almost 40,000 short-answer recall responses were collected and hand scored). The benefits of initial spacing were measured by interim cued recall tests and a final test administered days or weeks after relearning, and costs were measured by total practice time across sessions. A consistent qualitative pattern emerged: The benefits of initial spacing were substantial prior to relearning but were significantly attenuated after relearning. Moreover, the costs associated with achieving criterion via spaced practice during initial learning were also substantially attenuated by faster relearning in subsequent sessions. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088488     DOI: 10.1037/a0030498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  10 in total

1.  Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Kalif E Vaughn; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05

2.  Retrieval practice and spacing effects in multi-session treatment of naming impairment in aphasia.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Katherine A Rawson; Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Verbal and spatial acquisition as a function of distributed practice and code-specific interference.

Authors:  Adam P Young; Alice F Healy; Matt Jones; Lyle E Bourne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

4.  Effects of successive relearning on recall: Does relearning override the effects of initial learning criterion?

Authors:  Kalif E Vaughn; John Dunlosky; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

5.  Collaborative testing for key-term definitions under representative conditions: Efficiency costs and no learning benefits.

Authors:  Kathryn T Wissman; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

6.  Word repetition and retrieval practice effects in aphasia: Evidence for use-dependent learning in lexical access.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Erica L Middleton
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Using Testing as a Learning Tool.

Authors:  Brenda W Yang; Juan Razo; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Executive Function, Self-Regulated Learning, and Reading Comprehension: A Training Study.

Authors:  Paul T Cirino; Jeremy Miciak; Elyssa Gerst; Marcia A Barnes; Sharon Vaughn; Amanda Child; Emily Huston-Warren
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2016-01-08

9.  Effects of distributed practice and criterion level on word retrieval in aphasia.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Katherine A Rawson; Erica L Middleton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-08

10.  Comparing models of learning and relearning in large-scale cognitive training data sets.

Authors:  Aakriti Kumar; Aaron S Benjamin; Andrew Heathcote; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2022-10-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.