Andrea R Zammit1, John M Starr, Wendy Johnson, Ian J Deary. 1. Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Aging and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, Scotland, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical, emotional, and psychosocial wellbeing are important domains of function. The aims of this study were to explore the existence of separable groups among 70-year olds with scores representing physical function, perceived quality of life, and emotional wellbeing, and to characterise any resulting groups using demographic, personality, cognition, health and lifestyle variables. METHODS: We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify possible groups. RESULTS: Results suggested there were 5 groups. These included High (n = 515, 47.2% of the sample), Average (n = 417, 38.3%), and Poor Wellbeing (n = 37, 3.4%) groups. The two other groups had contrasting patterns of wellbeing: one group scored relatively well on physical function, but low on emotional wellbeing (Good Fitness/ Low Spirits,n = 60, 5.5%), whereas the other group showed low physical function but relatively well emotional wellbeing (Low Fitness/Good Spirits, n = 62, 5.7%). Salient characteristics that distinguished all the groups included smoking and drinking behaviours, personality, and illness. CONCLUSIONS: Despite there being some evidence of these groups, the results also support a largely one-dimensional construct of wellbeing in old age--for the domains assessed here--though with some evidence that some individuals have uneven profiles.
BACKGROUND: Physical, emotional, and psychosocial wellbeing are important domains of function. The aims of this study were to explore the existence of separable groups among 70-year olds with scores representing physical function, perceived quality of life, and emotional wellbeing, and to characterise any resulting groups using demographic, personality, cognition, health and lifestyle variables. METHODS: We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify possible groups. RESULTS: Results suggested there were 5 groups. These included High (n = 515, 47.2% of the sample), Average (n = 417, 38.3%), and Poor Wellbeing (n = 37, 3.4%) groups. The two other groups had contrasting patterns of wellbeing: one group scored relatively well on physical function, but low on emotional wellbeing (Good Fitness/ Low Spirits,n = 60, 5.5%), whereas the other group showed low physical function but relatively well emotional wellbeing (Low Fitness/Good Spirits, n = 62, 5.7%). Salient characteristics that distinguished all the groups included smoking and drinking behaviours, personality, and illness. CONCLUSIONS: Despite there being some evidence of these groups, the results also support a largely one-dimensional construct of wellbeing in old age--for the domains assessed here--though with some evidence that some individuals have uneven profiles.
Authors: L F Berkman; T E Seeman; M Albert; D Blazer; R Kahn; R Mohs; C Finch; E Schneider; C Cotman; G McClearn Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Ian J Deary; Alan J Gow; Michelle D Taylor; Janie Corley; Caroline Brett; Valerie Wilson; Harry Campbell; Lawrence J Whalley; Peter M Visscher; David J Porteous; John M Starr Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2007-12-05 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Zonghua Wang; Juan Zhou; Xingli Luo; Yan Xu; Xi She; Ling Chen; Honghua Yin; Xianyuan Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240