Literature DB >> 23088277

Chemogenomics in drug discovery: computational methods based on the comparison of binding sites.

Anna Vulpetti1, Tuomo Kalliokoski, Francesca Milletti.   

Abstract

Novel computational methods for understanding relationships between ligands and all possible biological targets have emerged in recent years. Proteins are connected to each other based on the similarity of their ligands or based on the similarity of their binding sites. The assumption is that compounds sharing chemical similarity should share targets and that targets with a similar binding site should also share ligands. A large number of computational techniques have been developed to assess ligand and binding site similarity, which can be used to make quantitative predictions of the most probable biological target of a given compound. This review covers the recent advances in new computational methods for relating biological targets based on the similarity of their binding sites. Binding site comparisons are used for the prediction of their most likely ligands, their possible cross reactivity and selectivity. These comparisons can also be used to infer the function of novel uncharacterized proteins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23088277     DOI: 10.4155/fmc.12.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Med Chem        ISSN: 1756-8919            Impact factor:   3.808


  7 in total

1.  PatchSearch: a web server for off-target protein identification.

Authors:  Julien Rey; Inès Rasolohery; Pierre Tufféry; Frédéric Guyon; Gautier Moroy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Considerations of Protein Subpockets in Fragment-Based Drug Design.

Authors:  Matthew Bartolowits; V Jo Davisson
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.817

3.  Data-Driven Construction of Antitumor Agents with Controlled Polypharmacology.

Authors:  Chenxiao Da; Dehui Zhang; Michael Stashko; Eleana Vasileiadi; Rebecca E Parker; Katherine A Minson; Madeline G Huey; Justus M Huelse; Debra Hunter; Thomas S K Gilbert; Jacqueline Norris-Drouin; Michael Miley; Laura E Herring; Lee M Graves; Deborah DeRyckere; H Shelton Earp; Douglas K Graham; Stephen V Frye; Xiaodong Wang; Dmitri Kireev
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  3D similarities between the binding sites of monoaminergic target proteins.

Authors:  Gabriel Núñez-Vivanco; Angélica Fierro; Pablo Moya; Patricio Iturriaga-Vásquez; Miguel Reyes-Parada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Computational prediction and in vitro validation of VEGFR1 as a novel protein target for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  Kumaraswamy Naidu Chitrala; Xiaoming Yang; Brandon Busbee; Narendra P Singh; Laura Bonati; Yongna Xing; Prakash Nagarkatti; Mitzi Nagarkatti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Substrate-driven mapping of the degradome by comparison of sequence logos.

Authors:  Julian E Fuchs; Susanne von Grafenstein; Roland G Huber; Christian Kramer; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Geomfinder: a multi-feature identifier of similar three-dimensional protein patterns: a ligand-independent approach.

Authors:  Gabriel Núñez-Vivanco; Alejandro Valdés-Jiménez; Felipe Besoaín; Miguel Reyes-Parada
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.514

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.